Cargando…

Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus

Porcine epidemic diarrhoea (PED) is a contagious enteric disease of pigs caused by a coronavirus. A double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) based on the use of monoclonal antibodies was developed for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV). The DAS-ELI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sozzi, Enrica, Luppi, Andrea, Lelli, Davide, Martin, Ana Moreno, Canelli, Elena, Brocchi, Emiliana, Lavazza, Antonio, Cordioli, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19501378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.05.009
_version_ 1783513377267515392
author Sozzi, Enrica
Luppi, Andrea
Lelli, Davide
Martin, Ana Moreno
Canelli, Elena
Brocchi, Emiliana
Lavazza, Antonio
Cordioli, Paolo
author_facet Sozzi, Enrica
Luppi, Andrea
Lelli, Davide
Martin, Ana Moreno
Canelli, Elena
Brocchi, Emiliana
Lavazza, Antonio
Cordioli, Paolo
author_sort Sozzi, Enrica
collection PubMed
description Porcine epidemic diarrhoea (PED) is a contagious enteric disease of pigs caused by a coronavirus. A double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) based on the use of monoclonal antibodies was developed for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV). The DAS-ELISA was compared with RT-PCR in the examination of 506 specimens collected during 2006–2007 from pigs originating from different farms located in the Po valley. Both faecal samples obtained directly from the rectum of live animals showing clinical signs and intestinal samples collected from the caecum of deceased pigs were included in the study. The correlation between the two methods was higher when testing faecal samples (K = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94–1.00) than testing intestinal samples (K = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35–0.89). The use of ELISA technology provided an efficient and effective mean of evaluating the presence of coronavirus PED antigen in field samples and indicates that this procedure is a very useful tool in epidemiological studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7111879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71118792020-04-02 Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus Sozzi, Enrica Luppi, Andrea Lelli, Davide Martin, Ana Moreno Canelli, Elena Brocchi, Emiliana Lavazza, Antonio Cordioli, Paolo Res Vet Sci Article Porcine epidemic diarrhoea (PED) is a contagious enteric disease of pigs caused by a coronavirus. A double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) based on the use of monoclonal antibodies was developed for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV). The DAS-ELISA was compared with RT-PCR in the examination of 506 specimens collected during 2006–2007 from pigs originating from different farms located in the Po valley. Both faecal samples obtained directly from the rectum of live animals showing clinical signs and intestinal samples collected from the caecum of deceased pigs were included in the study. The correlation between the two methods was higher when testing faecal samples (K = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94–1.00) than testing intestinal samples (K = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35–0.89). The use of ELISA technology provided an efficient and effective mean of evaluating the presence of coronavirus PED antigen in field samples and indicates that this procedure is a very useful tool in epidemiological studies. Elsevier Ltd. 2010-02 2009-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7111879/ /pubmed/19501378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.05.009 Text en Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Sozzi, Enrica
Luppi, Andrea
Lelli, Davide
Martin, Ana Moreno
Canelli, Elena
Brocchi, Emiliana
Lavazza, Antonio
Cordioli, Paolo
Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
title Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
title_full Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
title_fullStr Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
title_short Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
title_sort comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and rt-pcr for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19501378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.05.009
work_keys_str_mv AT sozzienrica comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus
AT luppiandrea comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus
AT lellidavide comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus
AT martinanamoreno comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus
AT canellielena comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus
AT brocchiemiliana comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus
AT lavazzaantonio comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus
AT cordiolipaolo comparisonofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayandrtpcrforthedetectionofporcineepidemicdiarrhoeavirus