Cargando…

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes

Type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) play an important role in the innate host defense against viral infection by inducing antiviral responses. In addition to direct antiviral activities, type I IFN serves as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response through multiple mechanisms....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sang-Myeong, Schommer, Susan K., Kleiboeker, Steven B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7112598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15507307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.009
_version_ 1783513504657965056
author Lee, Sang-Myeong
Schommer, Susan K.
Kleiboeker, Steven B.
author_facet Lee, Sang-Myeong
Schommer, Susan K.
Kleiboeker, Steven B.
author_sort Lee, Sang-Myeong
collection PubMed
description Type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) play an important role in the innate host defense against viral infection by inducing antiviral responses. In addition to direct antiviral activities, type I IFN serves as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response through multiple mechanisms. Therefore, the outcome of a viral infection can be affected by IFN induction and the IFN sensitivity of a virus. North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) field isolates were studied with regard to IFN-α sensitivity and induction in order to understand the role of type I IFN in PRRSV pathogenesis. PRRSV isolates were differentially sensitive to porcine recombinant IFN-α (rIFN-α) and varied in their ability to induce IFN-α in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM) cultures as measured by a porcine IFN-α specific ELISA on cell culture supernatants. Fifty-two plaques were purified from three PRRSV isolates (numbers 3, 7, and 12) and tested for IFN sensitivity and IFN induction. Plaque-derived populations were composed of heterogeneous populations in terms of IFN-inducing capacity and sensitivity to rIFN-α. When macrophages infected with isolates 3, 7, or 12 were treated with polycytidylic acid (polyI:C), IFN-α production was enhanced. Cells infected with isolate 3 and treated with polyI:C showed the most consistent and strongest enhancement of IFN-α production. It was demonstrated that the relatively low concentrations of IFN-α produced by isolate 3 contributed to the enhanced IFN-α synthesis in response to polyI:C. Isolates 7 and 12 significantly suppressed the enhanced IFN-α production by isolate 3 in polyI:C treated cells. To determine if suppression was at the level of IFN-α transcription, quantitative RT-PCR was performed for IFN-α mRNA and compared to GAPDH and cyclophilin mRNA quantification. However, the relative number of IFN-α transcript copies did not correlate with IFN-α protein levels, suggesting a post-transcriptional mechanism of suppression. In summary, these results demonstrate that PRRSV field isolates differ both in IFN-α sensitivity and induction. Furthermore, a PRRSV field isolate strongly enhance polyI:C-induced IFN-α production in PAM cultures and this priming effect was suppressed by other PRRSV isolates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7112598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71125982020-04-02 Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes Lee, Sang-Myeong Schommer, Susan K. Kleiboeker, Steven B. Vet Immunol Immunopathol Article Type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) play an important role in the innate host defense against viral infection by inducing antiviral responses. In addition to direct antiviral activities, type I IFN serves as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response through multiple mechanisms. Therefore, the outcome of a viral infection can be affected by IFN induction and the IFN sensitivity of a virus. North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) field isolates were studied with regard to IFN-α sensitivity and induction in order to understand the role of type I IFN in PRRSV pathogenesis. PRRSV isolates were differentially sensitive to porcine recombinant IFN-α (rIFN-α) and varied in their ability to induce IFN-α in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM) cultures as measured by a porcine IFN-α specific ELISA on cell culture supernatants. Fifty-two plaques were purified from three PRRSV isolates (numbers 3, 7, and 12) and tested for IFN sensitivity and IFN induction. Plaque-derived populations were composed of heterogeneous populations in terms of IFN-inducing capacity and sensitivity to rIFN-α. When macrophages infected with isolates 3, 7, or 12 were treated with polycytidylic acid (polyI:C), IFN-α production was enhanced. Cells infected with isolate 3 and treated with polyI:C showed the most consistent and strongest enhancement of IFN-α production. It was demonstrated that the relatively low concentrations of IFN-α produced by isolate 3 contributed to the enhanced IFN-α synthesis in response to polyI:C. Isolates 7 and 12 significantly suppressed the enhanced IFN-α production by isolate 3 in polyI:C treated cells. To determine if suppression was at the level of IFN-α transcription, quantitative RT-PCR was performed for IFN-α mRNA and compared to GAPDH and cyclophilin mRNA quantification. However, the relative number of IFN-α transcript copies did not correlate with IFN-α protein levels, suggesting a post-transcriptional mechanism of suppression. In summary, these results demonstrate that PRRSV field isolates differ both in IFN-α sensitivity and induction. Furthermore, a PRRSV field isolate strongly enhance polyI:C-induced IFN-α production in PAM cultures and this priming effect was suppressed by other PRRSV isolates. Elsevier B.V. 2004-12-08 2004-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7112598/ /pubmed/15507307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.009 Text en Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Sang-Myeong
Schommer, Susan K.
Kleiboeker, Steven B.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
title Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
title_full Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
title_fullStr Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
title_full_unstemmed Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
title_short Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
title_sort porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7112598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15507307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.009
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangmyeong porcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusfieldisolatesdifferininvitrointerferonphenotypes
AT schommersusank porcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusfieldisolatesdifferininvitrointerferonphenotypes
AT kleiboekerstevenb porcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusfieldisolatesdifferininvitrointerferonphenotypes