Cargando…
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes
Type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) play an important role in the innate host defense against viral infection by inducing antiviral responses. In addition to direct antiviral activities, type I IFN serves as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response through multiple mechanisms....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7112598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15507307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.009 |
_version_ | 1783513504657965056 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sang-Myeong Schommer, Susan K. Kleiboeker, Steven B. |
author_facet | Lee, Sang-Myeong Schommer, Susan K. Kleiboeker, Steven B. |
author_sort | Lee, Sang-Myeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) play an important role in the innate host defense against viral infection by inducing antiviral responses. In addition to direct antiviral activities, type I IFN serves as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response through multiple mechanisms. Therefore, the outcome of a viral infection can be affected by IFN induction and the IFN sensitivity of a virus. North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) field isolates were studied with regard to IFN-α sensitivity and induction in order to understand the role of type I IFN in PRRSV pathogenesis. PRRSV isolates were differentially sensitive to porcine recombinant IFN-α (rIFN-α) and varied in their ability to induce IFN-α in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM) cultures as measured by a porcine IFN-α specific ELISA on cell culture supernatants. Fifty-two plaques were purified from three PRRSV isolates (numbers 3, 7, and 12) and tested for IFN sensitivity and IFN induction. Plaque-derived populations were composed of heterogeneous populations in terms of IFN-inducing capacity and sensitivity to rIFN-α. When macrophages infected with isolates 3, 7, or 12 were treated with polycytidylic acid (polyI:C), IFN-α production was enhanced. Cells infected with isolate 3 and treated with polyI:C showed the most consistent and strongest enhancement of IFN-α production. It was demonstrated that the relatively low concentrations of IFN-α produced by isolate 3 contributed to the enhanced IFN-α synthesis in response to polyI:C. Isolates 7 and 12 significantly suppressed the enhanced IFN-α production by isolate 3 in polyI:C treated cells. To determine if suppression was at the level of IFN-α transcription, quantitative RT-PCR was performed for IFN-α mRNA and compared to GAPDH and cyclophilin mRNA quantification. However, the relative number of IFN-α transcript copies did not correlate with IFN-α protein levels, suggesting a post-transcriptional mechanism of suppression. In summary, these results demonstrate that PRRSV field isolates differ both in IFN-α sensitivity and induction. Furthermore, a PRRSV field isolate strongly enhance polyI:C-induced IFN-α production in PAM cultures and this priming effect was suppressed by other PRRSV isolates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7112598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71125982020-04-02 Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes Lee, Sang-Myeong Schommer, Susan K. Kleiboeker, Steven B. Vet Immunol Immunopathol Article Type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) play an important role in the innate host defense against viral infection by inducing antiviral responses. In addition to direct antiviral activities, type I IFN serves as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response through multiple mechanisms. Therefore, the outcome of a viral infection can be affected by IFN induction and the IFN sensitivity of a virus. North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) field isolates were studied with regard to IFN-α sensitivity and induction in order to understand the role of type I IFN in PRRSV pathogenesis. PRRSV isolates were differentially sensitive to porcine recombinant IFN-α (rIFN-α) and varied in their ability to induce IFN-α in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM) cultures as measured by a porcine IFN-α specific ELISA on cell culture supernatants. Fifty-two plaques were purified from three PRRSV isolates (numbers 3, 7, and 12) and tested for IFN sensitivity and IFN induction. Plaque-derived populations were composed of heterogeneous populations in terms of IFN-inducing capacity and sensitivity to rIFN-α. When macrophages infected with isolates 3, 7, or 12 were treated with polycytidylic acid (polyI:C), IFN-α production was enhanced. Cells infected with isolate 3 and treated with polyI:C showed the most consistent and strongest enhancement of IFN-α production. It was demonstrated that the relatively low concentrations of IFN-α produced by isolate 3 contributed to the enhanced IFN-α synthesis in response to polyI:C. Isolates 7 and 12 significantly suppressed the enhanced IFN-α production by isolate 3 in polyI:C treated cells. To determine if suppression was at the level of IFN-α transcription, quantitative RT-PCR was performed for IFN-α mRNA and compared to GAPDH and cyclophilin mRNA quantification. However, the relative number of IFN-α transcript copies did not correlate with IFN-α protein levels, suggesting a post-transcriptional mechanism of suppression. In summary, these results demonstrate that PRRSV field isolates differ both in IFN-α sensitivity and induction. Furthermore, a PRRSV field isolate strongly enhance polyI:C-induced IFN-α production in PAM cultures and this priming effect was suppressed by other PRRSV isolates. Elsevier B.V. 2004-12-08 2004-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7112598/ /pubmed/15507307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.009 Text en Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Sang-Myeong Schommer, Susan K. Kleiboeker, Steven B. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes |
title | Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes |
title_full | Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes |
title_fullStr | Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes |
title_full_unstemmed | Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes |
title_short | Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes |
title_sort | porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7112598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15507307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesangmyeong porcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusfieldisolatesdifferininvitrointerferonphenotypes AT schommersusank porcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusfieldisolatesdifferininvitrointerferonphenotypes AT kleiboekerstevenb porcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusfieldisolatesdifferininvitrointerferonphenotypes |