Cargando…

Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients

BACKGROUNDS: Reliable non-invasive methods for measuring body temperature are essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of infectious disease. METHODS: This study used Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and the Bland- Altman plot to analyse the agreement between temperature measurements usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Fanyu, Magnin, Chloe, Brouqui, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7112658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31734342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2019.11.003
_version_ 1783513516055986176
author Huang, Fanyu
Magnin, Chloe
Brouqui, Philippe
author_facet Huang, Fanyu
Magnin, Chloe
Brouqui, Philippe
author_sort Huang, Fanyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Reliable non-invasive methods for measuring body temperature are essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of infectious disease. METHODS: This study used Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and the Bland- Altman plot to analyse the agreement between temperature measurements using an ingestible capsule sensor, a skin sensor and two non-invasive peripheral temperature measurements (axillary and infrared non-contact), collected from a population of febrile patient admitted for infectious disease. RESULTS: Of the 77 febrile patients screened, 26 patients were enrolled. The ICC between axillary temperature measurements (Taxi) vs. non-contact measurements (Tno-c) were 0.34 [−0.18; 0.63], 0.87 [0.55; 0.94] between Taxi vs. ingestible capsule measurements (Tcap) and 0.12 [−0.09; 0.37] between Taxi vs. Tetac. The mean difference between Taxi vs Tno-c was −1.18 °C with limits of agreement (LoA) from −2.96 to 0.58 °C. The mean difference between Taxi vs Tcap was 0.48 °C, with LoA from −0.60 to 1.56 °C. The mean difference between Taxi vs Tetac was −4.23 °C with LoA from −7.22 to −1.23 °C. CONCLUSIONS: Ingestible capsule measurements are reliable enough to adequately estimate the core body temperature in clinical practice. Its non-invasiveness, and the real-time remote control offer new opportunities for future research into fever during infectious diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7112658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71126582020-04-02 Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients Huang, Fanyu Magnin, Chloe Brouqui, Philippe J Infect Article BACKGROUNDS: Reliable non-invasive methods for measuring body temperature are essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of infectious disease. METHODS: This study used Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and the Bland- Altman plot to analyse the agreement between temperature measurements using an ingestible capsule sensor, a skin sensor and two non-invasive peripheral temperature measurements (axillary and infrared non-contact), collected from a population of febrile patient admitted for infectious disease. RESULTS: Of the 77 febrile patients screened, 26 patients were enrolled. The ICC between axillary temperature measurements (Taxi) vs. non-contact measurements (Tno-c) were 0.34 [−0.18; 0.63], 0.87 [0.55; 0.94] between Taxi vs. ingestible capsule measurements (Tcap) and 0.12 [−0.09; 0.37] between Taxi vs. Tetac. The mean difference between Taxi vs Tno-c was −1.18 °C with limits of agreement (LoA) from −2.96 to 0.58 °C. The mean difference between Taxi vs Tcap was 0.48 °C, with LoA from −0.60 to 1.56 °C. The mean difference between Taxi vs Tetac was −4.23 °C with LoA from −7.22 to −1.23 °C. CONCLUSIONS: Ingestible capsule measurements are reliable enough to adequately estimate the core body temperature in clinical practice. Its non-invasiveness, and the real-time remote control offer new opportunities for future research into fever during infectious diseases. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. 2020-02 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7112658/ /pubmed/31734342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2019.11.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Fanyu
Magnin, Chloe
Brouqui, Philippe
Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients
title Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients
title_full Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients
title_fullStr Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients
title_full_unstemmed Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients
title_short Ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients
title_sort ingestible sensors correlate closely with peripheral temperature measurements in febrile patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7112658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31734342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2019.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT huangfanyu ingestiblesensorscorrelatecloselywithperipheraltemperaturemeasurementsinfebrilepatients
AT magninchloe ingestiblesensorscorrelatecloselywithperipheraltemperaturemeasurementsinfebrilepatients
AT brouquiphilippe ingestiblesensorscorrelatecloselywithperipheraltemperaturemeasurementsinfebrilepatients