Cargando…

Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare survival between standard lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection among patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing pulmonary resection between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Chien‐Sheng, Hsu, Po‐Kuei, Chen, Chun‐Ku, Yeh, Yi‐Chen, Hsu, Han‐Shui, Shih, Chun‐Che, Huang, Biing‐Shiun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32037690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13336
_version_ 1783513593396854784
author Huang, Chien‐Sheng
Hsu, Po‐Kuei
Chen, Chun‐Ku
Yeh, Yi‐Chen
Hsu, Han‐Shui
Shih, Chun‐Che
Huang, Biing‐Shiun
author_facet Huang, Chien‐Sheng
Hsu, Po‐Kuei
Chen, Chun‐Ku
Yeh, Yi‐Chen
Hsu, Han‐Shui
Shih, Chun‐Che
Huang, Biing‐Shiun
author_sort Huang, Chien‐Sheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare survival between standard lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection among patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing pulmonary resection between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in disease‐free survival (DFS) and DFS‐associated factors between patients receiving lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were analyzed after 1‐1 propensity score‐matching (n = 119 per group). RESULTS: In total, 1064 pathological stage I NSCLC patients were identified, including 816 (76.7%) who underwent lobectomy, 111 (10.4%) who underwent sublobar resection as a compromised procedure (medically unfit), and 137 (12.9%) who underwent surgeons' preference sublobar resection. Rates of five‐year DFS for patients undergoing lobectomy, medically unfit, and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were 88.7%, 71.0%, and 93.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that radiological solid‐appearance (adjusted hazard [aHR] = 2.908, P = 0.003), PL2 invasion (aHR = 1.970, P = 0.024), and angiolymphatic invasion (aHR = 2.202, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with lower DFS after adjusting for surgeons' preference sublobar resection (aH = 1.031, P = 0.939). Subgroup analysis of all 403 solid‐dominant patients demonstrated equivalent five‐year DFS between surgeons' preference sublobar resection and lobectomy (87.7% and 84.1%, respectively, P = 0.721). Propensity‐matched analysis showed no differences in five‐year DFS in stage I NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy or surgeons' preference sublobar resection (90.5% vs. 93.4% P = 0.510), and DFS for surgeons' preference sublobar resection remained an insignificant factor (aHR = 0.894, P = 0.834). CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected patients who have undergone surgeons' preference sublobar resection have comparable outcomes to those receiving lobectomy for stage I NSCLC <3 cm. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study Intended sublobar resection has a good outcome. What this study adds Sublobar resection is applicable for stage I NSCLC <3 cm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7113050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71130502020-04-02 Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm Huang, Chien‐Sheng Hsu, Po‐Kuei Chen, Chun‐Ku Yeh, Yi‐Chen Hsu, Han‐Shui Shih, Chun‐Che Huang, Biing‐Shiun Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare survival between standard lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection among patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing pulmonary resection between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in disease‐free survival (DFS) and DFS‐associated factors between patients receiving lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were analyzed after 1‐1 propensity score‐matching (n = 119 per group). RESULTS: In total, 1064 pathological stage I NSCLC patients were identified, including 816 (76.7%) who underwent lobectomy, 111 (10.4%) who underwent sublobar resection as a compromised procedure (medically unfit), and 137 (12.9%) who underwent surgeons' preference sublobar resection. Rates of five‐year DFS for patients undergoing lobectomy, medically unfit, and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were 88.7%, 71.0%, and 93.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that radiological solid‐appearance (adjusted hazard [aHR] = 2.908, P = 0.003), PL2 invasion (aHR = 1.970, P = 0.024), and angiolymphatic invasion (aHR = 2.202, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with lower DFS after adjusting for surgeons' preference sublobar resection (aH = 1.031, P = 0.939). Subgroup analysis of all 403 solid‐dominant patients demonstrated equivalent five‐year DFS between surgeons' preference sublobar resection and lobectomy (87.7% and 84.1%, respectively, P = 0.721). Propensity‐matched analysis showed no differences in five‐year DFS in stage I NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy or surgeons' preference sublobar resection (90.5% vs. 93.4% P = 0.510), and DFS for surgeons' preference sublobar resection remained an insignificant factor (aHR = 0.894, P = 0.834). CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected patients who have undergone surgeons' preference sublobar resection have comparable outcomes to those receiving lobectomy for stage I NSCLC <3 cm. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study Intended sublobar resection has a good outcome. What this study adds Sublobar resection is applicable for stage I NSCLC <3 cm. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-02-09 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7113050/ /pubmed/32037690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13336 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Huang, Chien‐Sheng
Hsu, Po‐Kuei
Chen, Chun‐Ku
Yeh, Yi‐Chen
Hsu, Han‐Shui
Shih, Chun‐Che
Huang, Biing‐Shiun
Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm
title Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm
title_full Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm
title_fullStr Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm
title_full_unstemmed Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm
title_short Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm
title_sort surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage i nsclc less than 3 cm
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32037690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13336
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchiensheng surgeonspreferencesublobarresectionforstageinsclclessthan3cm
AT hsupokuei surgeonspreferencesublobarresectionforstageinsclclessthan3cm
AT chenchunku surgeonspreferencesublobarresectionforstageinsclclessthan3cm
AT yehyichen surgeonspreferencesublobarresectionforstageinsclclessthan3cm
AT hsuhanshui surgeonspreferencesublobarresectionforstageinsclclessthan3cm
AT shihchunche surgeonspreferencesublobarresectionforstageinsclclessthan3cm
AT huangbiingshiun surgeonspreferencesublobarresectionforstageinsclclessthan3cm