Cargando…

Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the feasibilities of magnetic resonance (MR) image-based planning using synthetic computed tomography (sCT) versus CT (pCT)-based planning in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed in 16 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Sang Hoon, Kim, Jinsung, Chung, Yoonsun, Keserci, Bilgin, Pyo, Hongryull, Park, Hee Chul, Park, Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32229809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00101
_version_ 1783513607874543616
author Jung, Sang Hoon
Kim, Jinsung
Chung, Yoonsun
Keserci, Bilgin
Pyo, Hongryull
Park, Hee Chul
Park, Won
author_facet Jung, Sang Hoon
Kim, Jinsung
Chung, Yoonsun
Keserci, Bilgin
Pyo, Hongryull
Park, Hee Chul
Park, Won
author_sort Jung, Sang Hoon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the feasibilities of magnetic resonance (MR) image-based planning using synthetic computed tomography (sCT) versus CT (pCT)-based planning in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed in 16 patients with prostate cancer who had been treated with helical tomotherapy. MR images were acquired using a dedicated therapy sequence; sCT images were generated using magnetic resonance for calculating attenuation (MRCAT). The three-dimensional dose distribution according to sCT was recalculated using a previously optimized plan and was compared with the doses calculated using pCT. RESULTS: The mean planning target volume doses calculated by sCT and pCT differed by 0.65% ± 1.11% (p = 0.03). Three-dimensional gamma analysis at a 2%/2 mm dose difference/distance to agreement yielded a pass rate of 0.976 (range, 0.658 to 0.986). CONCLUSION: The dose distribution results obtained using tomotherapy from MR-only simulations were in good agreement with the dose distribution results from simulation CT, with mean dose differences of less than 1% for target volume and normal organs in patients with prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7113151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71131512020-04-07 Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer Jung, Sang Hoon Kim, Jinsung Chung, Yoonsun Keserci, Bilgin Pyo, Hongryull Park, Hee Chul Park, Won Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the feasibilities of magnetic resonance (MR) image-based planning using synthetic computed tomography (sCT) versus CT (pCT)-based planning in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed in 16 patients with prostate cancer who had been treated with helical tomotherapy. MR images were acquired using a dedicated therapy sequence; sCT images were generated using magnetic resonance for calculating attenuation (MRCAT). The three-dimensional dose distribution according to sCT was recalculated using a previously optimized plan and was compared with the doses calculated using pCT. RESULTS: The mean planning target volume doses calculated by sCT and pCT differed by 0.65% ± 1.11% (p = 0.03). Three-dimensional gamma analysis at a 2%/2 mm dose difference/distance to agreement yielded a pass rate of 0.976 (range, 0.658 to 0.986). CONCLUSION: The dose distribution results obtained using tomotherapy from MR-only simulations were in good agreement with the dose distribution results from simulation CT, with mean dose differences of less than 1% for target volume and normal organs in patients with prostate cancer. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2020-03 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7113151/ /pubmed/32229809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00101 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jung, Sang Hoon
Kim, Jinsung
Chung, Yoonsun
Keserci, Bilgin
Pyo, Hongryull
Park, Hee Chul
Park, Won
Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
title Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
title_full Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
title_short Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
title_sort magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32229809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00101
work_keys_str_mv AT jungsanghoon magneticresonanceimagebasedtomotherapyplanningforprostatecancer
AT kimjinsung magneticresonanceimagebasedtomotherapyplanningforprostatecancer
AT chungyoonsun magneticresonanceimagebasedtomotherapyplanningforprostatecancer
AT kesercibilgin magneticresonanceimagebasedtomotherapyplanningforprostatecancer
AT pyohongryull magneticresonanceimagebasedtomotherapyplanningforprostatecancer
AT parkheechul magneticresonanceimagebasedtomotherapyplanningforprostatecancer
AT parkwon magneticresonanceimagebasedtomotherapyplanningforprostatecancer