Cargando…

Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to patients and health services is steadily increasing. Self-management supported by mobile device applications could improve outcomes for people with COPD. Our aim was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of mobile health application...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, G., Whelan, M. E., Armitage, L. C., Roberts, N., Farmer, A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32238810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-0167-1
_version_ 1783513634859646976
author Shaw, G.
Whelan, M. E.
Armitage, L. C.
Roberts, N.
Farmer, A. J.
author_facet Shaw, G.
Whelan, M. E.
Armitage, L. C.
Roberts, N.
Farmer, A. J.
author_sort Shaw, G.
collection PubMed
description The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to patients and health services is steadily increasing. Self-management supported by mobile device applications could improve outcomes for people with COPD. Our aim was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of mobile health applications compared with usual care. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest included exacerbations, physical function, and Quality of Life (QoL). Where possible, outcome data were pooled for meta-analyses. Of 1709 citations returned, 13 were eligible trials. Number of exacerbations, quality of life, physical function, dyspnea, physical activity, and self-efficacy were reported. Evidence for effectiveness was inconsistent between studies, and the pooled effect size for physical function and QoL was not significant. There was notable variation in outcome measures used across trials. Developing a standardized outcome-reporting framework for digital health interventions in COPD self-management may help standardize future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7113264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71132642020-04-06 Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis Shaw, G. Whelan, M. E. Armitage, L. C. Roberts, N. Farmer, A. J. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Review Article The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to patients and health services is steadily increasing. Self-management supported by mobile device applications could improve outcomes for people with COPD. Our aim was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of mobile health applications compared with usual care. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest included exacerbations, physical function, and Quality of Life (QoL). Where possible, outcome data were pooled for meta-analyses. Of 1709 citations returned, 13 were eligible trials. Number of exacerbations, quality of life, physical function, dyspnea, physical activity, and self-efficacy were reported. Evidence for effectiveness was inconsistent between studies, and the pooled effect size for physical function and QoL was not significant. There was notable variation in outcome measures used across trials. Developing a standardized outcome-reporting framework for digital health interventions in COPD self-management may help standardize future research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7113264/ /pubmed/32238810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-0167-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Shaw, G.
Whelan, M. E.
Armitage, L. C.
Roberts, N.
Farmer, A. J.
Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort are copd self-management mobile applications effective? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32238810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-0167-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shawg arecopdselfmanagementmobileapplicationseffectiveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT whelanme arecopdselfmanagementmobileapplicationseffectiveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT armitagelc arecopdselfmanagementmobileapplicationseffectiveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertsn arecopdselfmanagementmobileapplicationseffectiveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT farmeraj arecopdselfmanagementmobileapplicationseffectiveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis