Cargando…

Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device is designed to augment cardiac output and reduce left ventricular wall stress and aims to improve survival in cases of cardiogenic shock. In this meta-analysis we investigated the haemodynamic effects of the Impella device in a clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dort, D. I. M., Peij, K. R. A. H., Manintveld, O. C., Hoeks, S. E., Morshuis, W. J., van Royen, N., Ten Cate, T., Geuzebroek, G. S. C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31811556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01351-7
_version_ 1783513651154518016
author van Dort, D. I. M.
Peij, K. R. A. H.
Manintveld, O. C.
Hoeks, S. E.
Morshuis, W. J.
van Royen, N.
Ten Cate, T.
Geuzebroek, G. S. C
author_facet van Dort, D. I. M.
Peij, K. R. A. H.
Manintveld, O. C.
Hoeks, S. E.
Morshuis, W. J.
van Royen, N.
Ten Cate, T.
Geuzebroek, G. S. C
author_sort van Dort, D. I. M.
collection PubMed
description The Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device is designed to augment cardiac output and reduce left ventricular wall stress and aims to improve survival in cases of cardiogenic shock. In this meta-analysis we investigated the haemodynamic effects of the Impella device in a clinical setting. We systematically searched all articles in PubMed/Medline and Embase up to July 2019. The primary outcomes were cardiac power (CP) and cardiac power index (CPI). Survival rates and other haemodynamic data were included as secondary outcomes. For the critical appraisal, we used a modified version of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services quality assessment form. The systematic review included 12 studies with a total of 596 patients. In 258 patients the CP and/or CPI could be extracted. Our meta-analysis showed an increase of 0.39 W [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24, 0.54], (p = 0.01) and 0.22 W/m(2) (95% CI: 0.18, 0.26), (p < 0.01) for the CP and CPI, respectively. The overall survival rate was 56% (95% CI: 0.50, 0.62), (p = 0.09). The quality of the studies was moderate, mostly due to the presence of confounders. Our study suggests that in patients with cardiogenic shock, Impella support seems effective in augmenting CP(I). This study merely investigates the haemodynamic effectiveness of the Impella device and does not reflect the complete clinical impact for the patient. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01351-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7113339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71133392020-04-06 Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis van Dort, D. I. M. Peij, K. R. A. H. Manintveld, O. C. Hoeks, S. E. Morshuis, W. J. van Royen, N. Ten Cate, T. Geuzebroek, G. S. C Neth Heart J Review Article The Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device is designed to augment cardiac output and reduce left ventricular wall stress and aims to improve survival in cases of cardiogenic shock. In this meta-analysis we investigated the haemodynamic effects of the Impella device in a clinical setting. We systematically searched all articles in PubMed/Medline and Embase up to July 2019. The primary outcomes were cardiac power (CP) and cardiac power index (CPI). Survival rates and other haemodynamic data were included as secondary outcomes. For the critical appraisal, we used a modified version of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services quality assessment form. The systematic review included 12 studies with a total of 596 patients. In 258 patients the CP and/or CPI could be extracted. Our meta-analysis showed an increase of 0.39 W [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24, 0.54], (p = 0.01) and 0.22 W/m(2) (95% CI: 0.18, 0.26), (p < 0.01) for the CP and CPI, respectively. The overall survival rate was 56% (95% CI: 0.50, 0.62), (p = 0.09). The quality of the studies was moderate, mostly due to the presence of confounders. Our study suggests that in patients with cardiogenic shock, Impella support seems effective in augmenting CP(I). This study merely investigates the haemodynamic effectiveness of the Impella device and does not reflect the complete clinical impact for the patient. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01351-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019-12-06 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7113339/ /pubmed/31811556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01351-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
van Dort, D. I. M.
Peij, K. R. A. H.
Manintveld, O. C.
Hoeks, S. E.
Morshuis, W. J.
van Royen, N.
Ten Cate, T.
Geuzebroek, G. S. C
Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31811556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01351-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vandortdim haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peijkrah haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manintveldoc haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hoeksse haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT morshuiswj haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanroyenn haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tencatet haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT geuzebroekgsc haemodynamicefficacyofmicroaxialleftventricularassistdeviceincardiogenicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis