Cargando…
Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing substantially and, despite improvements in medical therapy, HF still carries a poor prognosis. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) by a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) improves survival and quality of life in se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32096095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01375-4 |
_version_ | 1783513651392544768 |
---|---|
author | Felix, S. E. A. Ramjankhan, F. Z. Buijsrogge, M. P. Jacob, K. A. Asselbergs, F. W. Oerlemans, M. I. F. Kirkels, J. H. van Laake, L. W. Oppelaar, A. M. C. Suyker, W. J. L. de Jonge, N. |
author_facet | Felix, S. E. A. Ramjankhan, F. Z. Buijsrogge, M. P. Jacob, K. A. Asselbergs, F. W. Oerlemans, M. I. F. Kirkels, J. H. van Laake, L. W. Oppelaar, A. M. C. Suyker, W. J. L. de Jonge, N. |
author_sort | Felix, S. E. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing substantially and, despite improvements in medical therapy, HF still carries a poor prognosis. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) by a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) improves survival and quality of life in selected patients. This holds especially for the short-term outcome, but experience regarding long-term outcome is growing as the waiting time for heart transplantation is increasing due to the shortage of donor hearts. Here we present our results from the University Medical Centre Utrecht. METHODS: Data of all patients with a cf-LVAD implant between March 2006 and January 2018 were collected. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included adverse events defined according to the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) definitions, described per patient year. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients (69% male, mean age 50 ± 13 years) received a cf-LVAD. After a median follow-up of 542 (interquartile range 205–1044) days, heart transplantation had been performed in 82 (31%) patients, the cf-LVAD had been explanted in 8 (3%) and 71 (26%) had died. Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 83%, 72% and 57%, respectively, with heart transplantation, cf-LVAD explantation or death as the end-point. Death was most often caused by neurological complications (31%) or infection (20%). Major bleeding occurred 0.51 times and stroke 0.15 times per patient year. CONCLUSION: Not only short-term results but also 5‑year survival after cf-LVAD support demonstrate that MCS is a promising therapy as an extended bridge to heart transplantation. However, the incidence of several major complications still has to be addressed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01375-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7113343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71133432020-04-06 Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht Felix, S. E. A. Ramjankhan, F. Z. Buijsrogge, M. P. Jacob, K. A. Asselbergs, F. W. Oerlemans, M. I. F. Kirkels, J. H. van Laake, L. W. Oppelaar, A. M. C. Suyker, W. J. L. de Jonge, N. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing substantially and, despite improvements in medical therapy, HF still carries a poor prognosis. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) by a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) improves survival and quality of life in selected patients. This holds especially for the short-term outcome, but experience regarding long-term outcome is growing as the waiting time for heart transplantation is increasing due to the shortage of donor hearts. Here we present our results from the University Medical Centre Utrecht. METHODS: Data of all patients with a cf-LVAD implant between March 2006 and January 2018 were collected. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included adverse events defined according to the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) definitions, described per patient year. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients (69% male, mean age 50 ± 13 years) received a cf-LVAD. After a median follow-up of 542 (interquartile range 205–1044) days, heart transplantation had been performed in 82 (31%) patients, the cf-LVAD had been explanted in 8 (3%) and 71 (26%) had died. Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 83%, 72% and 57%, respectively, with heart transplantation, cf-LVAD explantation or death as the end-point. Death was most often caused by neurological complications (31%) or infection (20%). Major bleeding occurred 0.51 times and stroke 0.15 times per patient year. CONCLUSION: Not only short-term results but also 5‑year survival after cf-LVAD support demonstrate that MCS is a promising therapy as an extended bridge to heart transplantation. However, the incidence of several major complications still has to be addressed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01375-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-02-24 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7113343/ /pubmed/32096095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01375-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Felix, S. E. A. Ramjankhan, F. Z. Buijsrogge, M. P. Jacob, K. A. Asselbergs, F. W. Oerlemans, M. I. F. Kirkels, J. H. van Laake, L. W. Oppelaar, A. M. C. Suyker, W. J. L. de Jonge, N. Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht |
title | Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht |
title_full | Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht |
title_fullStr | Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht |
title_short | Outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht |
title_sort | outcome of mechanical circulatory support at the university medical centre utrecht |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32096095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01375-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT felixsea outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT ramjankhanfz outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT buijsroggemp outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT jacobka outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT asselbergsfw outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT oerlemansmif outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT kirkelsjh outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT vanlaakelw outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT oppelaaramc outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT suykerwjl outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht AT dejongen outcomeofmechanicalcirculatorysupportattheuniversitymedicalcentreutrecht |