Cargando…

Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old

INTRODUCTION: Frailty has been studied among the old population due to its association with negative outcomes. Presently there is no gold standard for measuring frailty, but several studies have used the frailty phenotype of Fried consisting of five components (weakness, slowness, unintentional weig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alves, Sara, Teixeira, Laetitia, Ribeiro, Oscar, Paúl, Constança
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00434
_version_ 1783513657102041088
author Alves, Sara
Teixeira, Laetitia
Ribeiro, Oscar
Paúl, Constança
author_facet Alves, Sara
Teixeira, Laetitia
Ribeiro, Oscar
Paúl, Constança
author_sort Alves, Sara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Frailty has been studied among the old population due to its association with negative outcomes. Presently there is no gold standard for measuring frailty, but several studies have used the frailty phenotype of Fried consisting of five components (weakness, slowness, unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity) that classify individuals as robust, pre-frail, or frail, depending on the number of components affected, respectively, zero, one or two, and three or more. This study aims to explore the specific contribution of each of these components to the frailty phenotype in a sample of oldest old community-dwelling individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals aged 80+ years old living in the community (N = 142) participated in this study. Sociodemographic data (age, sex, educational level, and marital status) and Fried’s frailty phenotype were collected. Descriptive analysis summarized sociodemographic information and the frailty components. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was performed to detect and explore relationships between frailty’s five components. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 88.07 years (SD = 5.30 years) and were mainly women (73.9%). The majority of the sample were considered frail (71.8%) and pre-frail (24.7%), and the most recurrent component for both groups was slowness. From the MCA analysis, a two-dimension solution was considered the most adequate, with 53.47% of variance explained. Dimension 1 (32.21% of variance explained) showed weakness as the most discriminant component; dimension 2 (21.26% of variance explained) showed unintentional weight loss as the most discriminant component. DISCUSSION: Results revealed a high number of pre-frail and frail participants. MCA proved to add an important understanding in examining the frailty phenotype; it revealed weakness as the most discriminant component for dimension 1, suggesting a high association with the frailty phenotype. MCA also identified two main features of frailty: one related with physical features (motor behavioral and grip strength) including weakness, low physical activity, and slowness; and the second related with intrinsic conditions (unintentional weight loss and exhaustion). CONCLUSION: This study corroborates the need of a differentiated approach to the frailty phenotype among very old individuals, bringing for consideration the specific influence of its components.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7113383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71133832020-04-09 Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old Alves, Sara Teixeira, Laetitia Ribeiro, Oscar Paúl, Constança Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Frailty has been studied among the old population due to its association with negative outcomes. Presently there is no gold standard for measuring frailty, but several studies have used the frailty phenotype of Fried consisting of five components (weakness, slowness, unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity) that classify individuals as robust, pre-frail, or frail, depending on the number of components affected, respectively, zero, one or two, and three or more. This study aims to explore the specific contribution of each of these components to the frailty phenotype in a sample of oldest old community-dwelling individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals aged 80+ years old living in the community (N = 142) participated in this study. Sociodemographic data (age, sex, educational level, and marital status) and Fried’s frailty phenotype were collected. Descriptive analysis summarized sociodemographic information and the frailty components. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was performed to detect and explore relationships between frailty’s five components. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 88.07 years (SD = 5.30 years) and were mainly women (73.9%). The majority of the sample were considered frail (71.8%) and pre-frail (24.7%), and the most recurrent component for both groups was slowness. From the MCA analysis, a two-dimension solution was considered the most adequate, with 53.47% of variance explained. Dimension 1 (32.21% of variance explained) showed weakness as the most discriminant component; dimension 2 (21.26% of variance explained) showed unintentional weight loss as the most discriminant component. DISCUSSION: Results revealed a high number of pre-frail and frail participants. MCA proved to add an important understanding in examining the frailty phenotype; it revealed weakness as the most discriminant component for dimension 1, suggesting a high association with the frailty phenotype. MCA also identified two main features of frailty: one related with physical features (motor behavioral and grip strength) including weakness, low physical activity, and slowness; and the second related with intrinsic conditions (unintentional weight loss and exhaustion). CONCLUSION: This study corroborates the need of a differentiated approach to the frailty phenotype among very old individuals, bringing for consideration the specific influence of its components. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7113383/ /pubmed/32273861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00434 Text en Copyright © 2020 Alves, Teixeira, Ribeiro and Paúl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Alves, Sara
Teixeira, Laetitia
Ribeiro, Oscar
Paúl, Constança
Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old
title Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old
title_full Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old
title_fullStr Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old
title_full_unstemmed Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old
title_short Examining Frailty Phenotype Dimensions in the Oldest Old
title_sort examining frailty phenotype dimensions in the oldest old
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00434
work_keys_str_mv AT alvessara examiningfrailtyphenotypedimensionsintheoldestold
AT teixeiralaetitia examiningfrailtyphenotypedimensionsintheoldestold
AT ribeirooscar examiningfrailtyphenotypedimensionsintheoldestold
AT paulconstanca examiningfrailtyphenotypedimensionsintheoldestold