Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar

INTRODUCTION: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the latency and duration of pterygomandibular nerve block with a mixture of 1.8 ml 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and 1 ml of 4 mg dexamethasone and its impact on postoperative sequelae after surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahu, Swati, Patley, Abhishek, Kharsan, Vinay, Madan, R. S., Manjula, V, Tiwari, Rahul Vinay Chandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318443
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_998_19
_version_ 1783513777903239168
author Sahu, Swati
Patley, Abhishek
Kharsan, Vinay
Madan, R. S.
Manjula, V
Tiwari, Rahul Vinay Chandra
author_facet Sahu, Swati
Patley, Abhishek
Kharsan, Vinay
Madan, R. S.
Manjula, V
Tiwari, Rahul Vinay Chandra
author_sort Sahu, Swati
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the latency and duration of pterygomandibular nerve block with a mixture of 1.8 ml 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and 1 ml of 4 mg dexamethasone and its impact on postoperative sequelae after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in 40 subjects referred to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery; they were divided into 20 subjects each in group A and B with the age range of 18–72 years planned for elective surgical removal of unilateral impacted mandibular third molar. Each patient was randomly selected to receive anesthesia using 1.8 ml 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in group A or 2.8 ml twin mix (1.8 ml 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine + 1 ml 4 mg dexamethasone) in group B. After injection of the anesthetic solution, the time to anesthetic effect, duration of anesthesia from initial patient perception of the anesthetic effect to the time when the effect subsides, need to reanesthetize the surgical site were recorded, and 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was used to subjectively assess the overall pain intensity while injecting the study drug, during surgery, and in the postoperative period. RESULTS: Mean VAS value for pain on local anesthetic injection was less in twin-mix group. The time of onset of the local anesthetic was significantly less for the study group T, 51.35 ± 7.15 s when compared with patients in study group C (P less than 0.0001). The duration of soft tissue anesthesia was longer for all the patients in the study group T. On comparative evaluation between study group C and study group T, patients in the control group had more severe swelling and reduction in mouth opening in the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexamethasone to lignocaine and its administration as an intraspace injection significantly shortens the latency and prolongs the duration of the soft tissue anesthesia, with improved quality of life in the postoperative period after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7113948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71139482020-04-21 Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar Sahu, Swati Patley, Abhishek Kharsan, Vinay Madan, R. S. Manjula, V Tiwari, Rahul Vinay Chandra J Family Med Prim Care Original Article INTRODUCTION: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the latency and duration of pterygomandibular nerve block with a mixture of 1.8 ml 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and 1 ml of 4 mg dexamethasone and its impact on postoperative sequelae after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in 40 subjects referred to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery; they were divided into 20 subjects each in group A and B with the age range of 18–72 years planned for elective surgical removal of unilateral impacted mandibular third molar. Each patient was randomly selected to receive anesthesia using 1.8 ml 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in group A or 2.8 ml twin mix (1.8 ml 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine + 1 ml 4 mg dexamethasone) in group B. After injection of the anesthetic solution, the time to anesthetic effect, duration of anesthesia from initial patient perception of the anesthetic effect to the time when the effect subsides, need to reanesthetize the surgical site were recorded, and 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was used to subjectively assess the overall pain intensity while injecting the study drug, during surgery, and in the postoperative period. RESULTS: Mean VAS value for pain on local anesthetic injection was less in twin-mix group. The time of onset of the local anesthetic was significantly less for the study group T, 51.35 ± 7.15 s when compared with patients in study group C (P less than 0.0001). The duration of soft tissue anesthesia was longer for all the patients in the study group T. On comparative evaluation between study group C and study group T, patients in the control group had more severe swelling and reduction in mouth opening in the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexamethasone to lignocaine and its administration as an intraspace injection significantly shortens the latency and prolongs the duration of the soft tissue anesthesia, with improved quality of life in the postoperative period after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7113948/ /pubmed/32318443 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_998_19 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sahu, Swati
Patley, Abhishek
Kharsan, Vinay
Madan, R. S.
Manjula, V
Tiwari, Rahul Vinay Chandra
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
title Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
title_full Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
title_short Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine hcl with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318443
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_998_19
work_keys_str_mv AT sahuswati comparativeevaluationofefficacyandlatencyoftwinmixvs2lignocainehclwith180000epinephrineinsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolar
AT patleyabhishek comparativeevaluationofefficacyandlatencyoftwinmixvs2lignocainehclwith180000epinephrineinsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolar
AT kharsanvinay comparativeevaluationofefficacyandlatencyoftwinmixvs2lignocainehclwith180000epinephrineinsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolar
AT madanrs comparativeevaluationofefficacyandlatencyoftwinmixvs2lignocainehclwith180000epinephrineinsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolar
AT manjulav comparativeevaluationofefficacyandlatencyoftwinmixvs2lignocainehclwith180000epinephrineinsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolar
AT tiwarirahulvinaychandra comparativeevaluationofefficacyandlatencyoftwinmixvs2lignocainehclwith180000epinephrineinsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolar