Cargando…
Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was conducted to assess failure rate of dental implant in medically compromised patients. METHODS: This study comprised of 68 medically compromised patients of both genders who underwent dental implants 5 years ago (Group I). Equal number of healthy subjects wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318439 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_989_19 |
_version_ | 1783513780737540096 |
---|---|
author | Parihar, Anuj Singh Madhuri, Sudha Devanna, Raghu Sharma, Geeta Singh, Rohit Shetty, Kaushik |
author_facet | Parihar, Anuj Singh Madhuri, Sudha Devanna, Raghu Sharma, Geeta Singh, Rohit Shetty, Kaushik |
author_sort | Parihar, Anuj Singh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was conducted to assess failure rate of dental implant in medically compromised patients. METHODS: This study comprised of 68 medically compromised patients of both genders who underwent dental implants 5 years ago (Group I). Equal number of healthy subjects was taken as control (Group II). Amount of bone loss around the implant over 1mm of bone loss in the first year and over 0.3 mm bone loss every subsequent year were considered as failures. RESULTS: The age group of 30-40 comprised of 25 patients in group I and 35 in group II, 40-50 years had 27 in group I and 23 in group II and 50-60 years had 16 in group I and 10 in group II. Medically compromised patients were diabetes (25) with 30 dental implants followed by osteoporosis (16) with 17 dental implants, hypothyroidism (12) with 14 dental implants, organ transplant (10) with 12 dental implants and CVD (5) with 7 dental implants. Chi- square test was applied which revealed significant difference in patients (P < 0.05). In group I, there were 18 (22.5%) and in group II, there were 4 (5.56%) dental implant failures. The difference with chi- square test found to be significant P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among medically compromised conditions, higher failure rate was found in diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7113960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71139602020-04-21 Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients Parihar, Anuj Singh Madhuri, Sudha Devanna, Raghu Sharma, Geeta Singh, Rohit Shetty, Kaushik J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was conducted to assess failure rate of dental implant in medically compromised patients. METHODS: This study comprised of 68 medically compromised patients of both genders who underwent dental implants 5 years ago (Group I). Equal number of healthy subjects was taken as control (Group II). Amount of bone loss around the implant over 1mm of bone loss in the first year and over 0.3 mm bone loss every subsequent year were considered as failures. RESULTS: The age group of 30-40 comprised of 25 patients in group I and 35 in group II, 40-50 years had 27 in group I and 23 in group II and 50-60 years had 16 in group I and 10 in group II. Medically compromised patients were diabetes (25) with 30 dental implants followed by osteoporosis (16) with 17 dental implants, hypothyroidism (12) with 14 dental implants, organ transplant (10) with 12 dental implants and CVD (5) with 7 dental implants. Chi- square test was applied which revealed significant difference in patients (P < 0.05). In group I, there were 18 (22.5%) and in group II, there were 4 (5.56%) dental implant failures. The difference with chi- square test found to be significant P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among medically compromised conditions, higher failure rate was found in diabetes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7113960/ /pubmed/32318439 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_989_19 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Parihar, Anuj Singh Madhuri, Sudha Devanna, Raghu Sharma, Geeta Singh, Rohit Shetty, Kaushik Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients |
title | Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients |
title_full | Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients |
title_fullStr | Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients |
title_short | Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients |
title_sort | assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318439 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_989_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pariharanujsingh assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients AT madhurisudha assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients AT devannaraghu assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients AT sharmageeta assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients AT singhrohit assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients AT shettykaushik assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients |