Cargando…

Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was conducted to assess failure rate of dental implant in medically compromised patients. METHODS: This study comprised of 68 medically compromised patients of both genders who underwent dental implants 5 years ago (Group I). Equal number of healthy subjects wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parihar, Anuj Singh, Madhuri, Sudha, Devanna, Raghu, Sharma, Geeta, Singh, Rohit, Shetty, Kaushik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318439
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_989_19
_version_ 1783513780737540096
author Parihar, Anuj Singh
Madhuri, Sudha
Devanna, Raghu
Sharma, Geeta
Singh, Rohit
Shetty, Kaushik
author_facet Parihar, Anuj Singh
Madhuri, Sudha
Devanna, Raghu
Sharma, Geeta
Singh, Rohit
Shetty, Kaushik
author_sort Parihar, Anuj Singh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was conducted to assess failure rate of dental implant in medically compromised patients. METHODS: This study comprised of 68 medically compromised patients of both genders who underwent dental implants 5 years ago (Group I). Equal number of healthy subjects was taken as control (Group II). Amount of bone loss around the implant over 1mm of bone loss in the first year and over 0.3 mm bone loss every subsequent year were considered as failures. RESULTS: The age group of 30-40 comprised of 25 patients in group I and 35 in group II, 40-50 years had 27 in group I and 23 in group II and 50-60 years had 16 in group I and 10 in group II. Medically compromised patients were diabetes (25) with 30 dental implants followed by osteoporosis (16) with 17 dental implants, hypothyroidism (12) with 14 dental implants, organ transplant (10) with 12 dental implants and CVD (5) with 7 dental implants. Chi- square test was applied which revealed significant difference in patients (P < 0.05). In group I, there were 18 (22.5%) and in group II, there were 4 (5.56%) dental implant failures. The difference with chi- square test found to be significant P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among medically compromised conditions, higher failure rate was found in diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7113960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71139602020-04-21 Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients Parihar, Anuj Singh Madhuri, Sudha Devanna, Raghu Sharma, Geeta Singh, Rohit Shetty, Kaushik J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was conducted to assess failure rate of dental implant in medically compromised patients. METHODS: This study comprised of 68 medically compromised patients of both genders who underwent dental implants 5 years ago (Group I). Equal number of healthy subjects was taken as control (Group II). Amount of bone loss around the implant over 1mm of bone loss in the first year and over 0.3 mm bone loss every subsequent year were considered as failures. RESULTS: The age group of 30-40 comprised of 25 patients in group I and 35 in group II, 40-50 years had 27 in group I and 23 in group II and 50-60 years had 16 in group I and 10 in group II. Medically compromised patients were diabetes (25) with 30 dental implants followed by osteoporosis (16) with 17 dental implants, hypothyroidism (12) with 14 dental implants, organ transplant (10) with 12 dental implants and CVD (5) with 7 dental implants. Chi- square test was applied which revealed significant difference in patients (P < 0.05). In group I, there were 18 (22.5%) and in group II, there were 4 (5.56%) dental implant failures. The difference with chi- square test found to be significant P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among medically compromised conditions, higher failure rate was found in diabetes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7113960/ /pubmed/32318439 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_989_19 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parihar, Anuj Singh
Madhuri, Sudha
Devanna, Raghu
Sharma, Geeta
Singh, Rohit
Shetty, Kaushik
Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
title Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
title_full Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
title_fullStr Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
title_short Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
title_sort assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318439
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_989_19
work_keys_str_mv AT pariharanujsingh assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients
AT madhurisudha assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients
AT devannaraghu assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients
AT sharmageeta assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients
AT singhrohit assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients
AT shettykaushik assessmentoffailurerateofdentalimplantsinmedicallycompromisedpatients