Cargando…
Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset
[Image: see text] Engineering proteins to enhance thermal stability is a widely utilized approach for creating industrially relevant biocatalysts. The development of new experimental datasets and computational tools to guide these engineering efforts remains an active area of research. Thus, to comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04105 |
_version_ | 1783513820040265728 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Peishan Chu, Simon K. S. Frizzo, Henrique N. Connolly, Morgan P. Caster, Ryan W. Siegel, Justin B. |
author_facet | Huang, Peishan Chu, Simon K. S. Frizzo, Henrique N. Connolly, Morgan P. Caster, Ryan W. Siegel, Justin B. |
author_sort | Huang, Peishan |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Engineering proteins to enhance thermal stability is a widely utilized approach for creating industrially relevant biocatalysts. The development of new experimental datasets and computational tools to guide these engineering efforts remains an active area of research. Thus, to complement the previously reported measures of T(50) and kinetic constants, we are reporting an expansion of our previously published dataset of mutants for β-glucosidase to include both measures of T(M) and ΔΔG. For a set of 51 mutants, we found that T(50) and T(M) are moderately correlated, with a Pearson correlation coefficient and Spearman’s rank coefficient of 0.58 and 0.47, respectively, indicating that the two methods capture different physical features. The performance of predicted stability using nine computational tools was also evaluated on the dataset of 51 mutants, none of which are found to be strong predictors of the observed changes in T(50), T(M), or ΔΔG. Furthermore, the ability of the nine algorithms to predict the production of isolatable soluble protein was examined, which revealed that Rosetta ΔΔG, FoldX, DeepDDG, PoPMuSiC, and SDM were capable of predicting if a mutant could be produced and isolated as a soluble protein. These results further highlight the need for new algorithms for predicting modest, yet important, changes in thermal stability as well as a new utility for current algorithms for prescreening designs for the production of mutants that maintain fold and soluble production properties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7114132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71141322020-04-03 Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset Huang, Peishan Chu, Simon K. S. Frizzo, Henrique N. Connolly, Morgan P. Caster, Ryan W. Siegel, Justin B. ACS Omega [Image: see text] Engineering proteins to enhance thermal stability is a widely utilized approach for creating industrially relevant biocatalysts. The development of new experimental datasets and computational tools to guide these engineering efforts remains an active area of research. Thus, to complement the previously reported measures of T(50) and kinetic constants, we are reporting an expansion of our previously published dataset of mutants for β-glucosidase to include both measures of T(M) and ΔΔG. For a set of 51 mutants, we found that T(50) and T(M) are moderately correlated, with a Pearson correlation coefficient and Spearman’s rank coefficient of 0.58 and 0.47, respectively, indicating that the two methods capture different physical features. The performance of predicted stability using nine computational tools was also evaluated on the dataset of 51 mutants, none of which are found to be strong predictors of the observed changes in T(50), T(M), or ΔΔG. Furthermore, the ability of the nine algorithms to predict the production of isolatable soluble protein was examined, which revealed that Rosetta ΔΔG, FoldX, DeepDDG, PoPMuSiC, and SDM were capable of predicting if a mutant could be produced and isolated as a soluble protein. These results further highlight the need for new algorithms for predicting modest, yet important, changes in thermal stability as well as a new utility for current algorithms for prescreening designs for the production of mutants that maintain fold and soluble production properties. American Chemical Society 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7114132/ /pubmed/32258884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04105 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Huang, Peishan Chu, Simon K. S. Frizzo, Henrique N. Connolly, Morgan P. Caster, Ryan W. Siegel, Justin B. Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset |
title | Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction
Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset |
title_full | Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction
Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction
Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction
Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset |
title_short | Evaluating Protein Engineering Thermostability Prediction
Tools Using an Independently Generated Dataset |
title_sort | evaluating protein engineering thermostability prediction
tools using an independently generated dataset |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangpeishan evaluatingproteinengineeringthermostabilitypredictiontoolsusinganindependentlygenerateddataset AT chusimonks evaluatingproteinengineeringthermostabilitypredictiontoolsusinganindependentlygenerateddataset AT frizzohenriquen evaluatingproteinengineeringthermostabilitypredictiontoolsusinganindependentlygenerateddataset AT connollymorganp evaluatingproteinengineeringthermostabilitypredictiontoolsusinganindependentlygenerateddataset AT casterryanw evaluatingproteinengineeringthermostabilitypredictiontoolsusinganindependentlygenerateddataset AT siegeljustinb evaluatingproteinengineeringthermostabilitypredictiontoolsusinganindependentlygenerateddataset |