Cargando…

Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation

INTRODUCTION: Deep learning neural networks are especially potent at dealing with structured data, such as images and volumes. Both modified LiviaNET and HyperDense-Net performed well at a prior competition segmenting 6-month-old infant magnetic resonance images, but neonatal cerebral tissue type id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Yang, Acosta, Rolando, Enguix, Vicente, Suffren, Sabrina, Ortmann, Janosch, Luck, David, Dolz, Jose, Lodygensky, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00207
_version_ 1783513855344771072
author Ding, Yang
Acosta, Rolando
Enguix, Vicente
Suffren, Sabrina
Ortmann, Janosch
Luck, David
Dolz, Jose
Lodygensky, Gregory A.
author_facet Ding, Yang
Acosta, Rolando
Enguix, Vicente
Suffren, Sabrina
Ortmann, Janosch
Luck, David
Dolz, Jose
Lodygensky, Gregory A.
author_sort Ding, Yang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Deep learning neural networks are especially potent at dealing with structured data, such as images and volumes. Both modified LiviaNET and HyperDense-Net performed well at a prior competition segmenting 6-month-old infant magnetic resonance images, but neonatal cerebral tissue type identification is challenging given its uniquely inverted tissue contrasts. The current study aims to evaluate the two architectures to segment neonatal brain tissue types at term equivalent age. METHODS: Both networks were retrained over 24 pairs of neonatal T1 and T2 data from the Developing Human Connectome Project public data set and validated on another eight pairs against ground truth. We then reported the best-performing model from training and its performance by computing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for each tissue type against eight test subjects. RESULTS: During the testing phase, among the segmentation approaches tested, the dual-modality HyperDense-Net achieved the best statistically significantly test mean DSC values, obtaining 0.94/0.95/0.92 for the tissue types and took 80 h to train and 10 min to segment, including preprocessing. The single-modality LiviaNET was better at processing T2-weighted images than processing T1-weighted images across all tissue types, achieving mean DSC values of 0.90/0.90/0.88 for gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively, while requiring 30 h to train and 8 min to segment each brain, including preprocessing. DISCUSSION: Our evaluation demonstrates that both neural networks can segment neonatal brains, achieving previously reported performance. Both networks will be continuously retrained over an increasingly larger repertoire of neonatal brain data and be made available through the Canadian Neonatal Brain Platform to better serve the neonatal brain imaging research community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7114297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71142972020-04-09 Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation Ding, Yang Acosta, Rolando Enguix, Vicente Suffren, Sabrina Ortmann, Janosch Luck, David Dolz, Jose Lodygensky, Gregory A. Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Deep learning neural networks are especially potent at dealing with structured data, such as images and volumes. Both modified LiviaNET and HyperDense-Net performed well at a prior competition segmenting 6-month-old infant magnetic resonance images, but neonatal cerebral tissue type identification is challenging given its uniquely inverted tissue contrasts. The current study aims to evaluate the two architectures to segment neonatal brain tissue types at term equivalent age. METHODS: Both networks were retrained over 24 pairs of neonatal T1 and T2 data from the Developing Human Connectome Project public data set and validated on another eight pairs against ground truth. We then reported the best-performing model from training and its performance by computing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for each tissue type against eight test subjects. RESULTS: During the testing phase, among the segmentation approaches tested, the dual-modality HyperDense-Net achieved the best statistically significantly test mean DSC values, obtaining 0.94/0.95/0.92 for the tissue types and took 80 h to train and 10 min to segment, including preprocessing. The single-modality LiviaNET was better at processing T2-weighted images than processing T1-weighted images across all tissue types, achieving mean DSC values of 0.90/0.90/0.88 for gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively, while requiring 30 h to train and 8 min to segment each brain, including preprocessing. DISCUSSION: Our evaluation demonstrates that both neural networks can segment neonatal brains, achieving previously reported performance. Both networks will be continuously retrained over an increasingly larger repertoire of neonatal brain data and be made available through the Canadian Neonatal Brain Platform to better serve the neonatal brain imaging research community. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7114297/ /pubmed/32273836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00207 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ding, Acosta, Enguix, Suffren, Ortmann, Luck, Dolz and Lodygensky. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ding, Yang
Acosta, Rolando
Enguix, Vicente
Suffren, Sabrina
Ortmann, Janosch
Luck, David
Dolz, Jose
Lodygensky, Gregory A.
Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation
title Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation
title_full Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation
title_fullStr Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation
title_full_unstemmed Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation
title_short Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation
title_sort using deep convolutional neural networks for neonatal brain image segmentation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00207
work_keys_str_mv AT dingyang usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation
AT acostarolando usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation
AT enguixvicente usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation
AT suffrensabrina usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation
AT ortmannjanosch usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation
AT luckdavid usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation
AT dolzjose usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation
AT lodygenskygregorya usingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforneonatalbrainimagesegmentation