Cargando…
Letter to the editor regarding the article ‘EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?’
This letter is in response to a recent paper by Millstone and Dawson (2019) in which the authors criticise the re-evaluation of the high intensity sweetener aspartame in 2013 by the former EFSA’s Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food, on the grounds that EFSA did not follow its...
Autores principales: | Kass, George E. N., Lodi, Federica |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-0395-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?
por: Millstone, Erik Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Confessions in AHT cases are unreliable: A letter to the editor
por: Luttner, Susan
Publicado: (2023) -
Unreliable Medical Certificates
Publicado: (1898) -
Unreliability of the Fixed Bridge
Publicado: (1904) -
Adulterated and Unreliable Drugs
Publicado: (1883)