Cargando…

Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks

Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organisation state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In areas where N95 masks are not available,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derrick, J.L., Gomersall, C.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15749326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.013
Descripción
Sumario:Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organisation state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In areas where N95 masks are not available, multiple layers of surgical masks have been tried to prevent transmission of SARS. The in vivo filtration capacity of a single surgical mask is known to be poor. However, the filtration capacity of a combination of masks is unknown. This was a crossover trial of one, two, three and five surgical masks in six volunteers to determine the in vivo filtration efficiency of wearing more than one surgical mask. We used a Portacount to measure the difference in ambient particle counts inside and outside the masks. The best combination of five surgical masks scored a fit factor of 13.7, which is well below the minimum level of 100 required for a half face respirator. Multiple surgical masks filter ambient particles poorly. They should not be used as a substitute for N95 masks unless there is no alternative.