Cargando…

Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks

Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organisation state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In areas where N95 masks are not available,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derrick, J.L., Gomersall, C.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15749326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.013
_version_ 1783513974301523968
author Derrick, J.L.
Gomersall, C.D.
author_facet Derrick, J.L.
Gomersall, C.D.
author_sort Derrick, J.L.
collection PubMed
description Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organisation state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In areas where N95 masks are not available, multiple layers of surgical masks have been tried to prevent transmission of SARS. The in vivo filtration capacity of a single surgical mask is known to be poor. However, the filtration capacity of a combination of masks is unknown. This was a crossover trial of one, two, three and five surgical masks in six volunteers to determine the in vivo filtration efficiency of wearing more than one surgical mask. We used a Portacount to measure the difference in ambient particle counts inside and outside the masks. The best combination of five surgical masks scored a fit factor of 13.7, which is well below the minimum level of 100 required for a half face respirator. Multiple surgical masks filter ambient particles poorly. They should not be used as a substitute for N95 masks unless there is no alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7114845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71148452020-04-02 Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks Derrick, J.L. Gomersall, C.D. J Hosp Infect Article Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organisation state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In areas where N95 masks are not available, multiple layers of surgical masks have been tried to prevent transmission of SARS. The in vivo filtration capacity of a single surgical mask is known to be poor. However, the filtration capacity of a combination of masks is unknown. This was a crossover trial of one, two, three and five surgical masks in six volunteers to determine the in vivo filtration efficiency of wearing more than one surgical mask. We used a Portacount to measure the difference in ambient particle counts inside and outside the masks. The best combination of five surgical masks scored a fit factor of 13.7, which is well below the minimum level of 100 required for a half face respirator. Multiple surgical masks filter ambient particles poorly. They should not be used as a substitute for N95 masks unless there is no alternative. The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2005-04 2005-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7114845/ /pubmed/15749326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.013 Text en Copyright © 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Derrick, J.L.
Gomersall, C.D.
Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks
title Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks
title_full Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks
title_fullStr Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks
title_full_unstemmed Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks
title_short Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks
title_sort protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtration capacity of multiple surgical masks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15749326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.013
work_keys_str_mv AT derrickjl protectinghealthcarestafffromsevereacuterespiratorysyndromefiltrationcapacityofmultiplesurgicalmasks
AT gomersallcd protectinghealthcarestafffromsevereacuterespiratorysyndromefiltrationcapacityofmultiplesurgicalmasks