Cargando…
Modelling competing legal arguments using Bayesian model comparison and averaging
Bayesian models of legal arguments generally aim to produce a single integrated model, combining each of the legal arguments under consideration. This combined approach implicitly assumes that variables and their relationships can be represented without any contradiction or misalignment, and in a wa...
Autores principales: | Neil, Martin, Fenton, Norman, Lagnado, David, Gill, Richard David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09250-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts
por: Shengelia, Tamara, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Using Bayesian networks to guide the assessment of new evidence in an appeal case
por: Smit, Nadine M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Bayesian model averaging for nonparametric discontinuity design
por: Hinne, Max, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
bModelTest: Bayesian phylogenetic site model averaging and model comparison
por: Bouckaert, Remco R., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Performance analysis of large language models in the domain of legal argument mining
por: Al Zubaer, Abdullah, et al.
Publicado: (2023)