Cargando…

Reduced Albuminuria and Potassemia Indicate Early Renal Repair Processes after Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 2

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic cardiorenal syndrome type 2 (T2-CRS) who qualify for resynchronization therapy (CRT) are exposed perioperatively to potentially nephrotoxic factors including contrast agents and blood loss. METHODS: The objective of this prospective interventional study was to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gala-Błądzińska, Agnieszka, Romanek, Janusz, Mazur, Danuta, Stepek, Tomasz, Braun, Marcin, Szafarz, Piotr, Chlebuś, Marcin, Przybylski, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2727108
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic cardiorenal syndrome type 2 (T2-CRS) who qualify for resynchronization therapy (CRT) are exposed perioperatively to potentially nephrotoxic factors including contrast agents and blood loss. METHODS: The objective of this prospective interventional study was to assess the effects of CRT on renal function in patients with T2-CRS within the first 48 hours following implantation. Initially, 76 patients (15% female; aged 69 ± 9.56 years) with heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II–IV), ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and QRS > 130 ms were included in the study. During CRT implantation, a nonionic contrast agent (72.2 ± 44.9 mL) was administered. Prior to and 48 hours following implantation, renal function was evaluated using the following serum biomarkers: creatinine (sCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation [eGFR(CKD-EPI)]), and the electrolyte and urine biomarkers albumin (uAlb), albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL). RESULTS: Before CRT, patients classified as NYHA class III or IV had higher uNGAL levels in comparison to uNGAL levels after CRT (43.63 ± 60.02 versus 16.63 ± 18.19; p=0.041). After CRT implantation, uAlb, UACR, and potassium levels were reduced (p < 0.05), and uNGAL, sCr, and eGFR(CKD-EPI) were unchanged. The contrast medium volume did not correlate with the test biomarkers (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2-CRS, uNGAL is a biomarker of kidney injury that correlates with the NYHA classes. A stable uNGAL value before and after CRT implantation confirms the lack of risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Reduced albuminuria and blood potassium are biomarkers of improving T2-CRS in the early post-CRT period.