Cargando…
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control
BACKGROUND: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) continues to be reported from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Data on the phenomenon of intermittent positive results for MERS-CoV on reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with negative results in between are lacking...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30352694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.020 |
_version_ | 1783514056332673024 |
---|---|
author | Alfaraj, Sarah H. Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A. Memish, Ziad A. |
author_facet | Alfaraj, Sarah H. Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A. Memish, Ziad A. |
author_sort | Alfaraj, Sarah H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) continues to be reported from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Data on the phenomenon of intermittent positive results for MERS-CoV on reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with negative results in between are lacking. Here we describe cases with intermittent positive MERS-CoV test results and highlight the required number of tests to rule out or rule in MERS-CoV infection based on a large retrospective cohort of patients with confirmed MERS-CoV. METHODS: This analysis included cases admitted between January 2014 and December 2017. The included patients had a minimum of 3 nasopharyngeal MERS-CoV RT-PCR tests for confirmation and needed 2 negative samples for MERS-CoV evaluated 48 hours apart with clinical improvement or stabilization apart to ensure clearance. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients with positive MERS-CoV test results were treated at the referring hospital. We excluded 72 patients who had only 1 swab result available in the system and were treated in the initial years of the disease. Of the remaining 336 patients, 300 (89%) had a positive result after 1 swab, 324 (96.5%) had a positive result after 2 consecutive swabs, and 328 (97.6%) had a positive result after 3 consecutive swabs. Of the total cases, 46 (13.7%) had a positive MERS-CoV test then a negative test, followed by positive test results. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that 2 to 3 nasopharyngeal samples are needed to produce the highest yield of positive results for MERS-CoV. In addition, 2 negative results 48 hours apart with clinical improvement or stabilization are needed to clear patients from MERS-CoV. Evaluation of the yield of sputum samples is needed to assess the effectiveness against nasopharyngeal swabs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7115256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71152562020-04-02 Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control Alfaraj, Sarah H. Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A. Memish, Ziad A. Am J Infect Control Major Article BACKGROUND: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) continues to be reported from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Data on the phenomenon of intermittent positive results for MERS-CoV on reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with negative results in between are lacking. Here we describe cases with intermittent positive MERS-CoV test results and highlight the required number of tests to rule out or rule in MERS-CoV infection based on a large retrospective cohort of patients with confirmed MERS-CoV. METHODS: This analysis included cases admitted between January 2014 and December 2017. The included patients had a minimum of 3 nasopharyngeal MERS-CoV RT-PCR tests for confirmation and needed 2 negative samples for MERS-CoV evaluated 48 hours apart with clinical improvement or stabilization apart to ensure clearance. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients with positive MERS-CoV test results were treated at the referring hospital. We excluded 72 patients who had only 1 swab result available in the system and were treated in the initial years of the disease. Of the remaining 336 patients, 300 (89%) had a positive result after 1 swab, 324 (96.5%) had a positive result after 2 consecutive swabs, and 328 (97.6%) had a positive result after 3 consecutive swabs. Of the total cases, 46 (13.7%) had a positive MERS-CoV test then a negative test, followed by positive test results. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that 2 to 3 nasopharyngeal samples are needed to produce the highest yield of positive results for MERS-CoV. In addition, 2 negative results 48 hours apart with clinical improvement or stabilization are needed to clear patients from MERS-CoV. Evaluation of the yield of sputum samples is needed to assess the effectiveness against nasopharyngeal swabs. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2019-03 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7115256/ /pubmed/30352694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.020 Text en © 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Major Article Alfaraj, Sarah H. Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A. Memish, Ziad A. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control |
title | Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control |
title_full | Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control |
title_fullStr | Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control |
title_full_unstemmed | Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control |
title_short | Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: Implications for infection control |
title_sort | middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus intermittent positive cases: implications for infection control |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30352694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alfarajsarahh middleeastrespiratorysyndromecoronavirusintermittentpositivecasesimplicationsforinfectioncontrol AT altawfiqjaffara middleeastrespiratorysyndromecoronavirusintermittentpositivecasesimplicationsforinfectioncontrol AT memishziada middleeastrespiratorysyndromecoronavirusintermittentpositivecasesimplicationsforinfectioncontrol |