Cargando…

Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no studies to date demonstrate potential spread of microbes during actual emergency medical service (EMS) activities. Our study introduces a novel approach to identification of contributors to EMS environment contamination and development of infection control strategies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valdez, Melissa K., Sexton, Jonathan D., Lutz, Eric A., Reynolds, Kelly A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mosby 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26042849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.025
_version_ 1783514059338940416
author Valdez, Melissa K.
Sexton, Jonathan D.
Lutz, Eric A.
Reynolds, Kelly A.
author_facet Valdez, Melissa K.
Sexton, Jonathan D.
Lutz, Eric A.
Reynolds, Kelly A.
author_sort Valdez, Melissa K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no studies to date demonstrate potential spread of microbes during actual emergency medical service (EMS) activities. Our study introduces a novel approach to identification of contributors to EMS environment contamination and development of infection control strategies, using a bacteriophage surrogate for pathogenic organisms. METHODS: Bacteriophage ΦX174 was used to trace cross-contamination and evaluate current disinfection practices and a hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) wipe intervention within emergency response vehicles. Prior to EMS calls, 2 surfaces were seeded with ΦX174. On call completion, EMS vehicle and equipment surfaces were sampled before decontamination, after decontamination per current practices, and after implementation of the intervention. RESULTS: Current decontamination practices did not significantly reduce viral loads on surfaces (P = .3113), but H(2)O(2) wipe intervention did (P = .0065). Bacteriophage spread to 56% (27/48) of sites and was reduced to 54% (26/48) and 40% (19/48) with current decontamination practices and intervention practices, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results suggest firefighters' hands were the main vehicles of microbial transfer. Current practices were not consistently applied or standardized and minimally reduced prevalence and quantity of microbial contamination on EMS surfaces. Although use of a consistent protocol of H(2)O(2) wipes significantly reduced percent prevalence and concentration of viruses, training and promotion of surface disinfection should be provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7115268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Mosby
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71152682020-04-02 Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response Valdez, Melissa K. Sexton, Jonathan D. Lutz, Eric A. Reynolds, Kelly A. Am J Infect Control Article BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no studies to date demonstrate potential spread of microbes during actual emergency medical service (EMS) activities. Our study introduces a novel approach to identification of contributors to EMS environment contamination and development of infection control strategies, using a bacteriophage surrogate for pathogenic organisms. METHODS: Bacteriophage ΦX174 was used to trace cross-contamination and evaluate current disinfection practices and a hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) wipe intervention within emergency response vehicles. Prior to EMS calls, 2 surfaces were seeded with ΦX174. On call completion, EMS vehicle and equipment surfaces were sampled before decontamination, after decontamination per current practices, and after implementation of the intervention. RESULTS: Current decontamination practices did not significantly reduce viral loads on surfaces (P = .3113), but H(2)O(2) wipe intervention did (P = .0065). Bacteriophage spread to 56% (27/48) of sites and was reduced to 54% (26/48) and 40% (19/48) with current decontamination practices and intervention practices, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results suggest firefighters' hands were the main vehicles of microbial transfer. Current practices were not consistently applied or standardized and minimally reduced prevalence and quantity of microbial contamination on EMS surfaces. Although use of a consistent protocol of H(2)O(2) wipes significantly reduced percent prevalence and concentration of viruses, training and promotion of surface disinfection should be provided. Mosby 2015-06-01 2015-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7115268/ /pubmed/26042849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.025 Text en Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Valdez, Melissa K.
Sexton, Jonathan D.
Lutz, Eric A.
Reynolds, Kelly A.
Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response
title Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response
title_full Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response
title_fullStr Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response
title_full_unstemmed Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response
title_short Spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response
title_sort spread of infectious microbes during emergency medical response
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26042849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.025
work_keys_str_mv AT valdezmelissak spreadofinfectiousmicrobesduringemergencymedicalresponse
AT sextonjonathand spreadofinfectiousmicrobesduringemergencymedicalresponse
AT lutzerica spreadofinfectiousmicrobesduringemergencymedicalresponse
AT reynoldskellya spreadofinfectiousmicrobesduringemergencymedicalresponse