Cargando…

Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the body contamination rates and environmental contamination levels during the removal of 3 types of personal protective clothing (PPC) by the individual accustomed removal method (IARM) and gown removal methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Y.P., Li, Yi, Wong, Peony L.H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24679582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.021
_version_ 1783514064524148736
author Guo, Y.P.
Li, Yi
Wong, Peony L.H.
author_facet Guo, Y.P.
Li, Yi
Wong, Peony L.H.
author_sort Guo, Y.P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the body contamination rates and environmental contamination levels during the removal of 3 types of personal protective clothing (PPC) by the individual accustomed removal method (IARM) and gown removal methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). METHODS: Fifty participants performed IARM and CDC-recommended gown removal methods to remove 3 types of PPC (ie, cotton gown, water resistant gown, and plastic apron) in random order at 2 separate sessions after applying Glo Germ simulated germ lotion on the gown's surface. A video demonstrating the CDC-recommended gown removal method was shown between the 2 sessions. After PPC removal, fluorescent stains were counted by an ultraviolet scan under dim light. RESULTS: Following IARM, contaminants were splashed in the surroundings, particularly on the front part of the subject. The plastic apron and cotton gown obtained the highest and lowest contaminative hazards, respectively, to the hands, shoes, and environment. Females, nurses, and senior staff had serious hand or shoe contamination. The CDC removal method more significantly reduced body and environmental contamination of small fluorescent stains (<1 cm(2)), but not of large patches (>1 cm(2)), than IARM. CONCLUSION: The effect of gown removal, PPC type, discarding PPC location, training of infection control measures, hand hygiene, and special work shoes should be considered daily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7115291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71152912020-04-02 Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing Guo, Y.P. Li, Yi Wong, Peony L.H. Am J Infect Control Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the body contamination rates and environmental contamination levels during the removal of 3 types of personal protective clothing (PPC) by the individual accustomed removal method (IARM) and gown removal methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). METHODS: Fifty participants performed IARM and CDC-recommended gown removal methods to remove 3 types of PPC (ie, cotton gown, water resistant gown, and plastic apron) in random order at 2 separate sessions after applying Glo Germ simulated germ lotion on the gown's surface. A video demonstrating the CDC-recommended gown removal method was shown between the 2 sessions. After PPC removal, fluorescent stains were counted by an ultraviolet scan under dim light. RESULTS: Following IARM, contaminants were splashed in the surroundings, particularly on the front part of the subject. The plastic apron and cotton gown obtained the highest and lowest contaminative hazards, respectively, to the hands, shoes, and environment. Females, nurses, and senior staff had serious hand or shoe contamination. The CDC removal method more significantly reduced body and environmental contamination of small fluorescent stains (<1 cm(2)), but not of large patches (>1 cm(2)), than IARM. CONCLUSION: The effect of gown removal, PPC type, discarding PPC location, training of infection control measures, hand hygiene, and special work shoes should be considered daily. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. 2014-04 2014-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7115291/ /pubmed/24679582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.021 Text en Copyright © 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Y.P.
Li, Yi
Wong, Peony L.H.
Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
title Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
title_full Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
title_fullStr Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
title_full_unstemmed Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
title_short Environment and body contamination: A comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
title_sort environment and body contamination: a comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24679582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.021
work_keys_str_mv AT guoyp environmentandbodycontaminationacomparisonoftwodifferentremovalmethodsinthreetypesofpersonalprotectiveclothing
AT liyi environmentandbodycontaminationacomparisonoftwodifferentremovalmethodsinthreetypesofpersonalprotectiveclothing
AT wongpeonylh environmentandbodycontaminationacomparisonoftwodifferentremovalmethodsinthreetypesofpersonalprotectiveclothing