Cargando…
Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances
BACKGROUND: Gloves are a necessary contact precaution to prevent transmission of infectious pathogens that spread by direct or indirect contact with an infected person or a contaminated environment. This article reports a study investigating hand and environmental contamination levels when health ca...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20869790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007 |
_version_ | 1783514069214429184 |
---|---|
author | Lai, Joanna Y.F. Guo, Y.P. Or, Peggy P.L. Li, Yi |
author_facet | Lai, Joanna Y.F. Guo, Y.P. Or, Peggy P.L. Li, Yi |
author_sort | Lai, Joanna Y.F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gloves are a necessary contact precaution to prevent transmission of infectious pathogens that spread by direct or indirect contact with an infected person or a contaminated environment. This article reports a study investigating hand and environmental contamination levels when health care workers (HCWs) followed two different methods of removing gloves at two distances from the rubbish bin. METHODS: Fifty HCWs performed a personal or causal glove removal method (pretest) and a Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-recommended glove removal method (posttest) at distances of 2 feet and 3 feet from the rubbish bin after the application of fluorescent solution (the simulated contaminant) onto their gloved hands. RESULTS: The incidence of the small patch of fluorescent stain (<1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves was significantly lower in the posttest than in the pretest. The incidence of small and large patches (>1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves and on the cover of the rubbish bin was significantly lower at 3 feet than at 2 feet. Health care assistants had significantly higher levels of contamination than other HCWs in the pretest but not in the posttest. There was no significant difference in hand contamination rate between pretest and posttest based on distance from the rubbish bin and type of HCW. CONCLUSION: The impact of the glove removal procedure and the distance to the bin in which used gloves are discarded should be taken into consideration on a daily basis, along with the supervision of infection control measures by minor staff. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7115311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71153112020-04-02 Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances Lai, Joanna Y.F. Guo, Y.P. Or, Peggy P.L. Li, Yi Am J Infect Control Major Article BACKGROUND: Gloves are a necessary contact precaution to prevent transmission of infectious pathogens that spread by direct or indirect contact with an infected person or a contaminated environment. This article reports a study investigating hand and environmental contamination levels when health care workers (HCWs) followed two different methods of removing gloves at two distances from the rubbish bin. METHODS: Fifty HCWs performed a personal or causal glove removal method (pretest) and a Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-recommended glove removal method (posttest) at distances of 2 feet and 3 feet from the rubbish bin after the application of fluorescent solution (the simulated contaminant) onto their gloved hands. RESULTS: The incidence of the small patch of fluorescent stain (<1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves was significantly lower in the posttest than in the pretest. The incidence of small and large patches (>1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves and on the cover of the rubbish bin was significantly lower at 3 feet than at 2 feet. Health care assistants had significantly higher levels of contamination than other HCWs in the pretest but not in the posttest. There was no significant difference in hand contamination rate between pretest and posttest based on distance from the rubbish bin and type of HCW. CONCLUSION: The impact of the glove removal procedure and the distance to the bin in which used gloves are discarded should be taken into consideration on a daily basis, along with the supervision of infection control measures by minor staff. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. 2011-03 2010-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7115311/ /pubmed/20869790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007 Text en Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Major Article Lai, Joanna Y.F. Guo, Y.P. Or, Peggy P.L. Li, Yi Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances |
title | Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances |
title_full | Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances |
title_fullStr | Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances |
title_short | Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances |
title_sort | comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20869790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laijoannayf comparisonofhandcontaminationratesandenvironmentalcontaminationlevelsbetweentwodifferentgloveremovalmethodsanddistances AT guoyp comparisonofhandcontaminationratesandenvironmentalcontaminationlevelsbetweentwodifferentgloveremovalmethodsanddistances AT orpeggypl comparisonofhandcontaminationratesandenvironmentalcontaminationlevelsbetweentwodifferentgloveremovalmethodsanddistances AT liyi comparisonofhandcontaminationratesandenvironmentalcontaminationlevelsbetweentwodifferentgloveremovalmethodsanddistances |