Cargando…

Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?

In the last decades, several ancillary methods, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular biology techniques, have increased the possibilities for the diagnosis and to evaluate the prognosis of lesions observed in a laboratory of pathology. Conversely, the impact of another method largely used a co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mari, Mireille, Hofman, Véronique, Butori, Catherine, Ilie, Marius, Lassalle, Sandra, Grier, Pascal, Sadoulet, Dominique, Scoazec, Jean-Yves, Hofman, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Masson SAS. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20837234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2010.05.012
_version_ 1783514084077993984
author Mari, Mireille
Hofman, Véronique
Butori, Catherine
Ilie, Marius
Lassalle, Sandra
Grier, Pascal
Sadoulet, Dominique
Scoazec, Jean-Yves
Hofman, Paul
author_facet Mari, Mireille
Hofman, Véronique
Butori, Catherine
Ilie, Marius
Lassalle, Sandra
Grier, Pascal
Sadoulet, Dominique
Scoazec, Jean-Yves
Hofman, Paul
author_sort Mari, Mireille
collection PubMed
description In the last decades, several ancillary methods, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular biology techniques, have increased the possibilities for the diagnosis and to evaluate the prognosis of lesions observed in a laboratory of pathology. Conversely, the impact of another method largely used a couple of years ago in a laboratory of pathology, the electron microscopy (EM), is currently limited. EM is a difficult, quite expensive and long method, which requires technicians with a high qualification. Therefore, EM is currently rarely available at the hospital in a laboratory of pathology and is essentially established in research centers. However, EM is still an essential tool for the surgical pathologist. This method allows in some circumstances to confirm or, more rarely, to make the diagnosis of a couple of tissular and cellular lesions observed in human pathology. EM is also an interesting method to better understand the etiopathogenesis of emerging human diseases, in particular of emerging infectious diseases. In this review, we report the main indication of EM in human pathology, we lay special emphasize in certain infectious diseases and neoplasia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7115376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier Masson SAS.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71153762020-04-02 Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ? Mari, Mireille Hofman, Véronique Butori, Catherine Ilie, Marius Lassalle, Sandra Grier, Pascal Sadoulet, Dominique Scoazec, Jean-Yves Hofman, Paul Ann Pathol Article In the last decades, several ancillary methods, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular biology techniques, have increased the possibilities for the diagnosis and to evaluate the prognosis of lesions observed in a laboratory of pathology. Conversely, the impact of another method largely used a couple of years ago in a laboratory of pathology, the electron microscopy (EM), is currently limited. EM is a difficult, quite expensive and long method, which requires technicians with a high qualification. Therefore, EM is currently rarely available at the hospital in a laboratory of pathology and is essentially established in research centers. However, EM is still an essential tool for the surgical pathologist. This method allows in some circumstances to confirm or, more rarely, to make the diagnosis of a couple of tissular and cellular lesions observed in human pathology. EM is also an interesting method to better understand the etiopathogenesis of emerging human diseases, in particular of emerging infectious diseases. In this review, we report the main indication of EM in human pathology, we lay special emphasize in certain infectious diseases and neoplasia. Elsevier Masson SAS. 2010-08 2010-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7115376/ /pubmed/20837234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2010.05.012 Text en Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Mari, Mireille
Hofman, Véronique
Butori, Catherine
Ilie, Marius
Lassalle, Sandra
Grier, Pascal
Sadoulet, Dominique
Scoazec, Jean-Yves
Hofman, Paul
Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?
title Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?
title_full Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?
title_fullStr Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?
title_full_unstemmed Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?
title_short Que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?
title_sort que reste t-il de la microscopie électronique pour le diagnostic anatomopathologique en 2010 ?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20837234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2010.05.012
work_keys_str_mv AT marimireille querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT hofmanveronique querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT butoricatherine querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT iliemarius querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT lassallesandra querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT grierpascal querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT sadouletdominique querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT scoazecjeanyves querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010
AT hofmanpaul querestetildelamicroscopieelectroniquepourlediagnosticanatomopathologiqueen2010