Cargando…
Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings
Arousals during sleep are transient accelerations of the EEG signal, considered to reflect sleep perturbations associated with poorer sleep quality. They are typically detected by visual inspection, which is time consuming, subjective, and prevents good comparability across scorers, studies and rese...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep2030020 |
_version_ | 1783514182501531648 |
---|---|
author | Chylinski, Daphne Rudzik, Franziska Coppieters ‘t Wallant, Dorothée Grignard, Martin Vandeleene, Nora Van Egroo, Maxime Thiesse, Laurie Solbach, Stig Maquet, Pierre Phillips, Christophe Vandewalle, Gilles Cajochen, Christian Muto, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Chylinski, Daphne Rudzik, Franziska Coppieters ‘t Wallant, Dorothée Grignard, Martin Vandeleene, Nora Van Egroo, Maxime Thiesse, Laurie Solbach, Stig Maquet, Pierre Phillips, Christophe Vandewalle, Gilles Cajochen, Christian Muto, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Chylinski, Daphne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Arousals during sleep are transient accelerations of the EEG signal, considered to reflect sleep perturbations associated with poorer sleep quality. They are typically detected by visual inspection, which is time consuming, subjective, and prevents good comparability across scorers, studies and research centres. We developed a fully automatic algorithm which aims at detecting artefact and arousal events in whole-night EEG recordings, based on time-frequency analysis with adapted thresholds derived from individual data. We ran an automated detection of arousals over 35 sleep EEG recordings in healthy young and older individuals and compared it against human visual detection from two research centres with the aim to evaluate the algorithm performance. Comparison across human scorers revealed a high variability in the number of detected arousals, which was always lower than the number detected automatically. Despite indexing more events, automatic detection showed high agreement with human detection as reflected by its correlation with human raters and very good Cohen’s kappa values. Finally, the sex of participants and sleep stage did not influence performance, while age may impact automatic detection, depending on the human rater considered as gold standard. We propose our freely available algorithm as a reliable and time-sparing alternative to visual detection of arousals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7115937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71159372020-09-01 Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings Chylinski, Daphne Rudzik, Franziska Coppieters ‘t Wallant, Dorothée Grignard, Martin Vandeleene, Nora Van Egroo, Maxime Thiesse, Laurie Solbach, Stig Maquet, Pierre Phillips, Christophe Vandewalle, Gilles Cajochen, Christian Muto, Vincenzo Clocks Sleep Article Arousals during sleep are transient accelerations of the EEG signal, considered to reflect sleep perturbations associated with poorer sleep quality. They are typically detected by visual inspection, which is time consuming, subjective, and prevents good comparability across scorers, studies and research centres. We developed a fully automatic algorithm which aims at detecting artefact and arousal events in whole-night EEG recordings, based on time-frequency analysis with adapted thresholds derived from individual data. We ran an automated detection of arousals over 35 sleep EEG recordings in healthy young and older individuals and compared it against human visual detection from two research centres with the aim to evaluate the algorithm performance. Comparison across human scorers revealed a high variability in the number of detected arousals, which was always lower than the number detected automatically. Despite indexing more events, automatic detection showed high agreement with human detection as reflected by its correlation with human raters and very good Cohen’s kappa values. Finally, the sex of participants and sleep stage did not influence performance, while age may impact automatic detection, depending on the human rater considered as gold standard. We propose our freely available algorithm as a reliable and time-sparing alternative to visual detection of arousals. MDPI 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7115937/ /pubmed/32803153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep2030020 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chylinski, Daphne Rudzik, Franziska Coppieters ‘t Wallant, Dorothée Grignard, Martin Vandeleene, Nora Van Egroo, Maxime Thiesse, Laurie Solbach, Stig Maquet, Pierre Phillips, Christophe Vandewalle, Gilles Cajochen, Christian Muto, Vincenzo Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings |
title | Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings |
title_full | Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings |
title_fullStr | Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings |
title_short | Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings |
title_sort | validation of an automatic arousal detection algorithm for whole-night sleep eeg recordings |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep2030020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chylinskidaphne validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT rudzikfranziska validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT coppieterstwallantdorothee validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT grignardmartin validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT vandeleenenora validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT vanegroomaxime validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT thiesselaurie validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT solbachstig validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT maquetpierre validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT phillipschristophe validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT vandewallegilles validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT cajochenchristian validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings AT mutovincenzo validationofanautomaticarousaldetectionalgorithmforwholenightsleepeegrecordings |