Cargando…

From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting

In 2013, the “biofabrication window” was introduced to reflect the processing challenge for the fields of biofabrication and bioprinting. At that time, the lack of printable materials that could serve as cell-laden bioinks, as well as the limitations of printing and assembly methods, presented a maj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levato, Riccardo, Jungst, Tomasz, Scheuring, Ruben G., Blunk, Torsten, Groll, Juergen, Malda, Jos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906423
_version_ 1783514201729269760
author Levato, Riccardo
Jungst, Tomasz
Scheuring, Ruben G.
Blunk, Torsten
Groll, Juergen
Malda, Jos
author_facet Levato, Riccardo
Jungst, Tomasz
Scheuring, Ruben G.
Blunk, Torsten
Groll, Juergen
Malda, Jos
author_sort Levato, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description In 2013, the “biofabrication window” was introduced to reflect the processing challenge for the fields of biofabrication and bioprinting. At that time, the lack of printable materials that could serve as cell-laden bioinks, as well as the limitations of printing and assembly methods, presented a major constraint. However, recent developments have now resulted in the availability of a plethora of bioinks, new printing approaches, and the technological advancement of established techniques. Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown which materials and technical parameters are essential for the fabrication of intrinsically hierarchical cell–material constructs that truly mimic biologically functional tissue. In order to achieve this, it is urged that the field now shift its focus from materials and technologies toward the biological development of the resulting constructs. Therefore, herein, the recent material and technological advances since the introduction of the biofabrication window are briefly summarized, i.e., approaches how to generate shape, to then focus the discussion on how to acquire the biological function within this context. In particular, a vision of how biological function can evolve from the possibility to determine shape is outlined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7116209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71162092020-10-16 From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting Levato, Riccardo Jungst, Tomasz Scheuring, Ruben G. Blunk, Torsten Groll, Juergen Malda, Jos Adv Mater Article In 2013, the “biofabrication window” was introduced to reflect the processing challenge for the fields of biofabrication and bioprinting. At that time, the lack of printable materials that could serve as cell-laden bioinks, as well as the limitations of printing and assembly methods, presented a major constraint. However, recent developments have now resulted in the availability of a plethora of bioinks, new printing approaches, and the technological advancement of established techniques. Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown which materials and technical parameters are essential for the fabrication of intrinsically hierarchical cell–material constructs that truly mimic biologically functional tissue. In order to achieve this, it is urged that the field now shift its focus from materials and technologies toward the biological development of the resulting constructs. Therefore, herein, the recent material and technological advances since the introduction of the biofabrication window are briefly summarized, i.e., approaches how to generate shape, to then focus the discussion on how to acquire the biological function within this context. In particular, a vision of how biological function can evolve from the possibility to determine shape is outlined. 2020-03-01 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7116209/ /pubmed/32045053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906423 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Levato, Riccardo
Jungst, Tomasz
Scheuring, Ruben G.
Blunk, Torsten
Groll, Juergen
Malda, Jos
From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
title From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
title_full From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
title_fullStr From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
title_full_unstemmed From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
title_short From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
title_sort from shape to function: the next step in bioprinting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906423
work_keys_str_mv AT levatoriccardo fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting
AT jungsttomasz fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting
AT scheuringrubeng fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting
AT blunktorsten fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting
AT grolljuergen fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting
AT maldajos fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting