Cargando…
From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
In 2013, the “biofabrication window” was introduced to reflect the processing challenge for the fields of biofabrication and bioprinting. At that time, the lack of printable materials that could serve as cell-laden bioinks, as well as the limitations of printing and assembly methods, presented a maj...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906423 |
_version_ | 1783514201729269760 |
---|---|
author | Levato, Riccardo Jungst, Tomasz Scheuring, Ruben G. Blunk, Torsten Groll, Juergen Malda, Jos |
author_facet | Levato, Riccardo Jungst, Tomasz Scheuring, Ruben G. Blunk, Torsten Groll, Juergen Malda, Jos |
author_sort | Levato, Riccardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2013, the “biofabrication window” was introduced to reflect the processing challenge for the fields of biofabrication and bioprinting. At that time, the lack of printable materials that could serve as cell-laden bioinks, as well as the limitations of printing and assembly methods, presented a major constraint. However, recent developments have now resulted in the availability of a plethora of bioinks, new printing approaches, and the technological advancement of established techniques. Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown which materials and technical parameters are essential for the fabrication of intrinsically hierarchical cell–material constructs that truly mimic biologically functional tissue. In order to achieve this, it is urged that the field now shift its focus from materials and technologies toward the biological development of the resulting constructs. Therefore, herein, the recent material and technological advances since the introduction of the biofabrication window are briefly summarized, i.e., approaches how to generate shape, to then focus the discussion on how to acquire the biological function within this context. In particular, a vision of how biological function can evolve from the possibility to determine shape is outlined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7116209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71162092020-10-16 From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting Levato, Riccardo Jungst, Tomasz Scheuring, Ruben G. Blunk, Torsten Groll, Juergen Malda, Jos Adv Mater Article In 2013, the “biofabrication window” was introduced to reflect the processing challenge for the fields of biofabrication and bioprinting. At that time, the lack of printable materials that could serve as cell-laden bioinks, as well as the limitations of printing and assembly methods, presented a major constraint. However, recent developments have now resulted in the availability of a plethora of bioinks, new printing approaches, and the technological advancement of established techniques. Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown which materials and technical parameters are essential for the fabrication of intrinsically hierarchical cell–material constructs that truly mimic biologically functional tissue. In order to achieve this, it is urged that the field now shift its focus from materials and technologies toward the biological development of the resulting constructs. Therefore, herein, the recent material and technological advances since the introduction of the biofabrication window are briefly summarized, i.e., approaches how to generate shape, to then focus the discussion on how to acquire the biological function within this context. In particular, a vision of how biological function can evolve from the possibility to determine shape is outlined. 2020-03-01 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7116209/ /pubmed/32045053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906423 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Article Levato, Riccardo Jungst, Tomasz Scheuring, Ruben G. Blunk, Torsten Groll, Juergen Malda, Jos From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting |
title | From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting |
title_full | From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting |
title_fullStr | From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting |
title_full_unstemmed | From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting |
title_short | From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting |
title_sort | from shape to function: the next step in bioprinting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levatoriccardo fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting AT jungsttomasz fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting AT scheuringrubeng fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting AT blunktorsten fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting AT grolljuergen fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting AT maldajos fromshapetofunctionthenextstepinbioprinting |