Cargando…

Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool

Personal hygiene practices, including facewashing and handwashing, reduce transmission of pathogens, but are difficult to measure. Using color theory principles, we developed and tested a novel metric that generates quantitative measures of facial and hand cleanliness, proxy indicators of personal h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delea, Maryann G., Snyder, Jedidiah S., Woreta, Mulat, Zewudie, Kassahun, Solomon, Anthony W., Freeman, Matthew C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32278303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113521
_version_ 1783514212550574080
author Delea, Maryann G.
Snyder, Jedidiah S.
Woreta, Mulat
Zewudie, Kassahun
Solomon, Anthony W.
Freeman, Matthew C.
author_facet Delea, Maryann G.
Snyder, Jedidiah S.
Woreta, Mulat
Zewudie, Kassahun
Solomon, Anthony W.
Freeman, Matthew C.
author_sort Delea, Maryann G.
collection PubMed
description Personal hygiene practices, including facewashing and handwashing, reduce transmission of pathogens, but are difficult to measure. Using color theory principles, we developed and tested a novel metric that generates quantitative measures of facial and hand cleanliness, proxy indicators of personal hygiene practices. In this cross-sectional study, conventional qualitative cleanliness metrics (e.g., presence or absence of nasal and ocular discharge, dirt under nails or on finger pads and palms) were also recorded. We generated Gwet’s agreement coefficients to determine the inter-rater reliability of novel and conventional metrics between various rating groups, where appropriate, including two non-blinded raters, non-blinded vs. blinded raters, three blinded raters, and blinded vs. computer raters. Inter-rater reliability of the novel metric was high across all rating groups, ranging from 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97, 0.99) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.91) for facial cleanliness, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.93) for hand cleanliness. Our novel metric generates more nuanced data than conventional qualitative metrics, and allows for quantifiable assessments of facial and hand cleanliness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7116344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71163442020-11-11 Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool Delea, Maryann G. Snyder, Jedidiah S. Woreta, Mulat Zewudie, Kassahun Solomon, Anthony W. Freeman, Matthew C. Int J Hyg Environ Health Article Personal hygiene practices, including facewashing and handwashing, reduce transmission of pathogens, but are difficult to measure. Using color theory principles, we developed and tested a novel metric that generates quantitative measures of facial and hand cleanliness, proxy indicators of personal hygiene practices. In this cross-sectional study, conventional qualitative cleanliness metrics (e.g., presence or absence of nasal and ocular discharge, dirt under nails or on finger pads and palms) were also recorded. We generated Gwet’s agreement coefficients to determine the inter-rater reliability of novel and conventional metrics between various rating groups, where appropriate, including two non-blinded raters, non-blinded vs. blinded raters, three blinded raters, and blinded vs. computer raters. Inter-rater reliability of the novel metric was high across all rating groups, ranging from 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97, 0.99) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.91) for facial cleanliness, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.93) for hand cleanliness. Our novel metric generates more nuanced data than conventional qualitative metrics, and allows for quantifiable assessments of facial and hand cleanliness. 2020-06-01 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7116344/ /pubmed/32278303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113521 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Delea, Maryann G.
Snyder, Jedidiah S.
Woreta, Mulat
Zewudie, Kassahun
Solomon, Anthony W.
Freeman, Matthew C.
Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool
title Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool
title_full Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool
title_fullStr Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool
title_full_unstemmed Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool
title_short Development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool
title_sort development and reliability of a quantitative personal hygiene assessment tool
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32278303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113521
work_keys_str_mv AT deleamaryanng developmentandreliabilityofaquantitativepersonalhygieneassessmenttool
AT snyderjedidiahs developmentandreliabilityofaquantitativepersonalhygieneassessmenttool
AT woretamulat developmentandreliabilityofaquantitativepersonalhygieneassessmenttool
AT zewudiekassahun developmentandreliabilityofaquantitativepersonalhygieneassessmenttool
AT solomonanthonyw developmentandreliabilityofaquantitativepersonalhygieneassessmenttool
AT freemanmatthewc developmentandreliabilityofaquantitativepersonalhygieneassessmenttool