Cargando…

Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality

BACKGROUND: ‘Non-parametric directionality’ (NPD) is a novel method for estimation of directed functional connectivity (dFC) in neural data. The method has previously been verified in its ability to recover causal interactions in simulated spiking networks in Halliday et al. (2015). METHODS: This wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: West, Timothy O., Halliday, David M., Bressler, Steven L., Farmer, Simon F., Litvak, Vladimir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116796
_version_ 1783514221929037824
author West, Timothy O.
Halliday, David M.
Bressler, Steven L.
Farmer, Simon F.
Litvak, Vladimir
author_facet West, Timothy O.
Halliday, David M.
Bressler, Steven L.
Farmer, Simon F.
Litvak, Vladimir
author_sort West, Timothy O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ‘Non-parametric directionality’ (NPD) is a novel method for estimation of directed functional connectivity (dFC) in neural data. The method has previously been verified in its ability to recover causal interactions in simulated spiking networks in Halliday et al. (2015). METHODS: This work presents a validation of NPD in continuous neural recordings (e.g. local field potentials). Specifically, we use autoregressive models to simulate time delayed correlations between neural signals. We then test for the accurate recovery of networks in the face of several confounds typically encountered in empirical data. We examine the effects of NPD under varying: a) signal-to-noise ratios, b) asymmetries in signal strength, c) instantaneous mixing, d) common drive, e) data length, and f) parallel/convergent signal routing. We also apply NPD to data from a patient who underwent simultaneous magnetoencephalography and deep brain recording. RESULTS: We demonstrate that NPD can accurately recover directed functional connectivity from simulations with known patterns of connectivity. The performance of the NPD measure is compared with non-parametric estimators of Granger causality (NPG), a well-established methodology for model-free estimation of dFC. A series of simulations investigating synthetically imposed confounds demonstrate that NPD provides estimates of connectivity that are equivalent to NPG, albeit with an increased sensitivity to data length. However, we provide evidence that: i) NPD is less sensitive than NPG to degradation by noise; ii) NPD is more robust to the generation of false positive identification of connectivity resulting from SNR asymmetries; iii) NPD is more robust to corruption via moderate amounts of instantaneous signal mixing. CONCLUSIONS: The results in this paper highlight that to be practically applied to neural data, connectivity metrics should not only be accurate in their recovery of causal networks but also resistant to the confounding effects often encountered in experimental recordings of multimodal data. Taken together, these findings position NPD at the state-of-the-art with respect to the estimation of directed functional connectivity in neuroimaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7116477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71164772020-12-14 Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality West, Timothy O. Halliday, David M. Bressler, Steven L. Farmer, Simon F. Litvak, Vladimir Neuroimage Article BACKGROUND: ‘Non-parametric directionality’ (NPD) is a novel method for estimation of directed functional connectivity (dFC) in neural data. The method has previously been verified in its ability to recover causal interactions in simulated spiking networks in Halliday et al. (2015). METHODS: This work presents a validation of NPD in continuous neural recordings (e.g. local field potentials). Specifically, we use autoregressive models to simulate time delayed correlations between neural signals. We then test for the accurate recovery of networks in the face of several confounds typically encountered in empirical data. We examine the effects of NPD under varying: a) signal-to-noise ratios, b) asymmetries in signal strength, c) instantaneous mixing, d) common drive, e) data length, and f) parallel/convergent signal routing. We also apply NPD to data from a patient who underwent simultaneous magnetoencephalography and deep brain recording. RESULTS: We demonstrate that NPD can accurately recover directed functional connectivity from simulations with known patterns of connectivity. The performance of the NPD measure is compared with non-parametric estimators of Granger causality (NPG), a well-established methodology for model-free estimation of dFC. A series of simulations investigating synthetically imposed confounds demonstrate that NPD provides estimates of connectivity that are equivalent to NPG, albeit with an increased sensitivity to data length. However, we provide evidence that: i) NPD is less sensitive than NPG to degradation by noise; ii) NPD is more robust to the generation of false positive identification of connectivity resulting from SNR asymmetries; iii) NPD is more robust to corruption via moderate amounts of instantaneous signal mixing. CONCLUSIONS: The results in this paper highlight that to be practically applied to neural data, connectivity metrics should not only be accurate in their recovery of causal networks but also resistant to the confounding effects often encountered in experimental recordings of multimodal data. Taken together, these findings position NPD at the state-of-the-art with respect to the estimation of directed functional connectivity in neuroimaging. Academic Press 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7116477/ /pubmed/32325209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116796 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
West, Timothy O.
Halliday, David M.
Bressler, Steven L.
Farmer, Simon F.
Litvak, Vladimir
Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality
title Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality
title_full Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality
title_fullStr Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality
title_full_unstemmed Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality
title_short Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality
title_sort measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: validation and comparison with non-parametric granger causality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116796
work_keys_str_mv AT westtimothyo measuringdirectedfunctionalconnectivityusingnonparametricdirectionalityanalysisvalidationandcomparisonwithnonparametricgrangercausality
AT hallidaydavidm measuringdirectedfunctionalconnectivityusingnonparametricdirectionalityanalysisvalidationandcomparisonwithnonparametricgrangercausality
AT bresslerstevenl measuringdirectedfunctionalconnectivityusingnonparametricdirectionalityanalysisvalidationandcomparisonwithnonparametricgrangercausality
AT farmersimonf measuringdirectedfunctionalconnectivityusingnonparametricdirectionalityanalysisvalidationandcomparisonwithnonparametricgrangercausality
AT litvakvladimir measuringdirectedfunctionalconnectivityusingnonparametricdirectionalityanalysisvalidationandcomparisonwithnonparametricgrangercausality