Cargando…

Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities

Food insecurity persists in many parts of Africa and Asia, despite ongoing agricultural research for development (AR4D) interventions. This is resulting in a growing demand for alternative approaches to designing and evaluating interventions in complex systems. Theory of Change (ToC) is an approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maru, Yiheyis Taddele, Sparrow, Ashley, Butler, James R.A., Banerjee, Onil, Ison, Ray, Hall, Andy, Carberry, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32287945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.010
_version_ 1783514265993347072
author Maru, Yiheyis Taddele
Sparrow, Ashley
Butler, James R.A.
Banerjee, Onil
Ison, Ray
Hall, Andy
Carberry, Peter
author_facet Maru, Yiheyis Taddele
Sparrow, Ashley
Butler, James R.A.
Banerjee, Onil
Ison, Ray
Hall, Andy
Carberry, Peter
author_sort Maru, Yiheyis Taddele
collection PubMed
description Food insecurity persists in many parts of Africa and Asia, despite ongoing agricultural research for development (AR4D) interventions. This is resulting in a growing demand for alternative approaches to designing and evaluating interventions in complex systems. Theory of Change (ToC) is an approach which may be useful because it enables stakeholders to present and test their theories and assumptions about why and how impact may occur, ideally within an environment conducive to iterative reflection and learning. However, ToC is yet to be appropriately mainstreamed into development by donors, researchers and practitioners. We carried out a literature review, triangulated by interviews with 26 experts in African and Asian food security, consisting of researchers, advisors to programs, and donors. Although 17 (65%) of the experts had adopted ToC, their responses and the literature revealed four challenges to mainstreaming: (i) different interpretations of ToC; (ii) incoherence in relationships among the constituent concepts of ToC; (iii) confused relationships between ToC and project “logframes”; and (iv) limitations in necessary skills and commitment for enacting ToC. A case study of the evolution of a ToC in a West African AR4D project over 4 years which exemplified these challenges is presented. Five recommendations arise to assist the mainstreaming of ToC: (i) select a type of ToC suited to the relative complexity of the problem and focal system of interest; (ii) state a theory or hypotheses to be tested as the intervention progresses; (iii) articulate the relationship between the ToC and parallel approaches (e.g. logframe); (iv) accept that a ToC is a process, and (v) allow time and resources for implementers and researchers to develop ToC thinking within projects. Finally, we suggest that communities of practice should be established among AR4D and donor organisations to test, evaluate and improve the contribution that ToCs can make to sustainable food security and agricultural development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7116942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71169422020-04-02 Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities Maru, Yiheyis Taddele Sparrow, Ashley Butler, James R.A. Banerjee, Onil Ison, Ray Hall, Andy Carberry, Peter Agric Syst Article Food insecurity persists in many parts of Africa and Asia, despite ongoing agricultural research for development (AR4D) interventions. This is resulting in a growing demand for alternative approaches to designing and evaluating interventions in complex systems. Theory of Change (ToC) is an approach which may be useful because it enables stakeholders to present and test their theories and assumptions about why and how impact may occur, ideally within an environment conducive to iterative reflection and learning. However, ToC is yet to be appropriately mainstreamed into development by donors, researchers and practitioners. We carried out a literature review, triangulated by interviews with 26 experts in African and Asian food security, consisting of researchers, advisors to programs, and donors. Although 17 (65%) of the experts had adopted ToC, their responses and the literature revealed four challenges to mainstreaming: (i) different interpretations of ToC; (ii) incoherence in relationships among the constituent concepts of ToC; (iii) confused relationships between ToC and project “logframes”; and (iv) limitations in necessary skills and commitment for enacting ToC. A case study of the evolution of a ToC in a West African AR4D project over 4 years which exemplified these challenges is presented. Five recommendations arise to assist the mainstreaming of ToC: (i) select a type of ToC suited to the relative complexity of the problem and focal system of interest; (ii) state a theory or hypotheses to be tested as the intervention progresses; (iii) articulate the relationship between the ToC and parallel approaches (e.g. logframe); (iv) accept that a ToC is a process, and (v) allow time and resources for implementers and researchers to develop ToC thinking within projects. Finally, we suggest that communities of practice should be established among AR4D and donor organisations to test, evaluate and improve the contribution that ToCs can make to sustainable food security and agricultural development. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2018-09 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7116942/ /pubmed/32287945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.010 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Maru, Yiheyis Taddele
Sparrow, Ashley
Butler, James R.A.
Banerjee, Onil
Ison, Ray
Hall, Andy
Carberry, Peter
Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities
title Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities
title_full Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities
title_fullStr Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities
title_short Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities
title_sort towards appropriate mainstreaming of “theory of change” approaches into agricultural research for development: challenges and opportunities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32287945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.010
work_keys_str_mv AT maruyiheyistaddele towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities
AT sparrowashley towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities
AT butlerjamesra towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities
AT banerjeeonil towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities
AT isonray towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities
AT hallandy towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities
AT carberrypeter towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities