Cargando…
Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities
Food insecurity persists in many parts of Africa and Asia, despite ongoing agricultural research for development (AR4D) interventions. This is resulting in a growing demand for alternative approaches to designing and evaluating interventions in complex systems. Theory of Change (ToC) is an approach...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32287945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.010 |
_version_ | 1783514265993347072 |
---|---|
author | Maru, Yiheyis Taddele Sparrow, Ashley Butler, James R.A. Banerjee, Onil Ison, Ray Hall, Andy Carberry, Peter |
author_facet | Maru, Yiheyis Taddele Sparrow, Ashley Butler, James R.A. Banerjee, Onil Ison, Ray Hall, Andy Carberry, Peter |
author_sort | Maru, Yiheyis Taddele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Food insecurity persists in many parts of Africa and Asia, despite ongoing agricultural research for development (AR4D) interventions. This is resulting in a growing demand for alternative approaches to designing and evaluating interventions in complex systems. Theory of Change (ToC) is an approach which may be useful because it enables stakeholders to present and test their theories and assumptions about why and how impact may occur, ideally within an environment conducive to iterative reflection and learning. However, ToC is yet to be appropriately mainstreamed into development by donors, researchers and practitioners. We carried out a literature review, triangulated by interviews with 26 experts in African and Asian food security, consisting of researchers, advisors to programs, and donors. Although 17 (65%) of the experts had adopted ToC, their responses and the literature revealed four challenges to mainstreaming: (i) different interpretations of ToC; (ii) incoherence in relationships among the constituent concepts of ToC; (iii) confused relationships between ToC and project “logframes”; and (iv) limitations in necessary skills and commitment for enacting ToC. A case study of the evolution of a ToC in a West African AR4D project over 4 years which exemplified these challenges is presented. Five recommendations arise to assist the mainstreaming of ToC: (i) select a type of ToC suited to the relative complexity of the problem and focal system of interest; (ii) state a theory or hypotheses to be tested as the intervention progresses; (iii) articulate the relationship between the ToC and parallel approaches (e.g. logframe); (iv) accept that a ToC is a process, and (v) allow time and resources for implementers and researchers to develop ToC thinking within projects. Finally, we suggest that communities of practice should be established among AR4D and donor organisations to test, evaluate and improve the contribution that ToCs can make to sustainable food security and agricultural development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7116942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71169422020-04-02 Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities Maru, Yiheyis Taddele Sparrow, Ashley Butler, James R.A. Banerjee, Onil Ison, Ray Hall, Andy Carberry, Peter Agric Syst Article Food insecurity persists in many parts of Africa and Asia, despite ongoing agricultural research for development (AR4D) interventions. This is resulting in a growing demand for alternative approaches to designing and evaluating interventions in complex systems. Theory of Change (ToC) is an approach which may be useful because it enables stakeholders to present and test their theories and assumptions about why and how impact may occur, ideally within an environment conducive to iterative reflection and learning. However, ToC is yet to be appropriately mainstreamed into development by donors, researchers and practitioners. We carried out a literature review, triangulated by interviews with 26 experts in African and Asian food security, consisting of researchers, advisors to programs, and donors. Although 17 (65%) of the experts had adopted ToC, their responses and the literature revealed four challenges to mainstreaming: (i) different interpretations of ToC; (ii) incoherence in relationships among the constituent concepts of ToC; (iii) confused relationships between ToC and project “logframes”; and (iv) limitations in necessary skills and commitment for enacting ToC. A case study of the evolution of a ToC in a West African AR4D project over 4 years which exemplified these challenges is presented. Five recommendations arise to assist the mainstreaming of ToC: (i) select a type of ToC suited to the relative complexity of the problem and focal system of interest; (ii) state a theory or hypotheses to be tested as the intervention progresses; (iii) articulate the relationship between the ToC and parallel approaches (e.g. logframe); (iv) accept that a ToC is a process, and (v) allow time and resources for implementers and researchers to develop ToC thinking within projects. Finally, we suggest that communities of practice should be established among AR4D and donor organisations to test, evaluate and improve the contribution that ToCs can make to sustainable food security and agricultural development. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2018-09 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7116942/ /pubmed/32287945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.010 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Maru, Yiheyis Taddele Sparrow, Ashley Butler, James R.A. Banerjee, Onil Ison, Ray Hall, Andy Carberry, Peter Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities |
title | Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities |
title_full | Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities |
title_fullStr | Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities |
title_short | Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities |
title_sort | towards appropriate mainstreaming of “theory of change” approaches into agricultural research for development: challenges and opportunities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32287945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maruyiheyistaddele towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities AT sparrowashley towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities AT butlerjamesra towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities AT banerjeeonil towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities AT isonray towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities AT hallandy towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities AT carberrypeter towardsappropriatemainstreamingoftheoryofchangeapproachesintoagriculturalresearchfordevelopmentchallengesandopportunities |