Cargando…
Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)
BACKGROUND: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) is a theory-informed, pragmatic intervention using peer volunteering support to promote active ageing in socially disengaged, inactive older adults. This study aimed to establish ACE’s feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Fifty-four older adults were r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz003 |
_version_ | 1783514408164524032 |
---|---|
author | Stathi, Afroditi Withall, Janet Thompson, Janice L Davis, Mark G Gray, Selena De Koning, Jolanthe Parkhurst, Graham Lloyd, Liz Greaves, Colin Laventure, Robert Fox, Kenneth R |
author_facet | Stathi, Afroditi Withall, Janet Thompson, Janice L Davis, Mark G Gray, Selena De Koning, Jolanthe Parkhurst, Graham Lloyd, Liz Greaves, Colin Laventure, Robert Fox, Kenneth R |
author_sort | Stathi, Afroditi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) is a theory-informed, pragmatic intervention using peer volunteering support to promote active ageing in socially disengaged, inactive older adults. This study aimed to establish ACE’s feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Fifty-four older adults were recruited as either peer volunteers (activators; n = 15) or participants (ACEs; n = 39). Participants were randomized to one-to-one support from an activator (ACEs-Intervention [ACEs-I]) or a waiting-list control group (ACEs-Control [ACEs-C]). Activators supported ACEs-I to get out more and engage with local activities. Objectively measured physical activity (PA), lower limb function, and number of out of house activities were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed changes in confidence to get out and about, social support, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of ACEs (mean age = 73.7 years [SD 7.3]) and all activators completed assessments at both baseline and post-intervention (6 months). ACEs-I reported more out of house activities (M [SD] = 6.34 [4.15]). ACEs-I increased physical function post-intervention (M [SD] = 9.8 [2.3]). ACEs-I reported improved well-being and vitality and increased confidence to get out and about, confidence in the face of specific barriers, knowledge of local initiatives, and perceived social support post-intervention. Activators, although sufficiently active at baseline, increased their PA further. ACE was well-accepted and easy to deliver. CONCLUSIONS: ACE is an acceptable and feasible intervention for helping socially disengaged older people to get out and about more, improve their confidence, and engage more with their community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7117619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71176192020-04-06 Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) Stathi, Afroditi Withall, Janet Thompson, Janice L Davis, Mark G Gray, Selena De Koning, Jolanthe Parkhurst, Graham Lloyd, Liz Greaves, Colin Laventure, Robert Fox, Kenneth R Gerontologist Intervention Research BACKGROUND: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) is a theory-informed, pragmatic intervention using peer volunteering support to promote active ageing in socially disengaged, inactive older adults. This study aimed to establish ACE’s feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Fifty-four older adults were recruited as either peer volunteers (activators; n = 15) or participants (ACEs; n = 39). Participants were randomized to one-to-one support from an activator (ACEs-Intervention [ACEs-I]) or a waiting-list control group (ACEs-Control [ACEs-C]). Activators supported ACEs-I to get out more and engage with local activities. Objectively measured physical activity (PA), lower limb function, and number of out of house activities were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed changes in confidence to get out and about, social support, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of ACEs (mean age = 73.7 years [SD 7.3]) and all activators completed assessments at both baseline and post-intervention (6 months). ACEs-I reported more out of house activities (M [SD] = 6.34 [4.15]). ACEs-I increased physical function post-intervention (M [SD] = 9.8 [2.3]). ACEs-I reported improved well-being and vitality and increased confidence to get out and about, confidence in the face of specific barriers, knowledge of local initiatives, and perceived social support post-intervention. Activators, although sufficiently active at baseline, increased their PA further. ACE was well-accepted and easy to deliver. CONCLUSIONS: ACE is an acceptable and feasible intervention for helping socially disengaged older people to get out and about more, improve their confidence, and engage more with their community. Oxford University Press 2020-04 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7117619/ /pubmed/30779849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz003 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Intervention Research Stathi, Afroditi Withall, Janet Thompson, Janice L Davis, Mark G Gray, Selena De Koning, Jolanthe Parkhurst, Graham Lloyd, Liz Greaves, Colin Laventure, Robert Fox, Kenneth R Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) |
title | Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) |
title_full | Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) |
title_fullStr | Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) |
title_short | Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) |
title_sort | feasibility trial evaluation of a peer volunteering active aging intervention: ace (active, connected, engaged) |
topic | Intervention Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stathiafroditi feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT withalljanet feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT thompsonjanicel feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT davismarkg feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT grayselena feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT dekoningjolanthe feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT parkhurstgraham feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT lloydliz feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT greavescolin feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT laventurerobert feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged AT foxkennethr feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged |