Cargando…

Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)

BACKGROUND: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) is a theory-informed, pragmatic intervention using peer volunteering support to promote active ageing in socially disengaged, inactive older adults. This study aimed to establish ACE’s feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Fifty-four older adults were r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stathi, Afroditi, Withall, Janet, Thompson, Janice L, Davis, Mark G, Gray, Selena, De Koning, Jolanthe, Parkhurst, Graham, Lloyd, Liz, Greaves, Colin, Laventure, Robert, Fox, Kenneth R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz003
_version_ 1783514408164524032
author Stathi, Afroditi
Withall, Janet
Thompson, Janice L
Davis, Mark G
Gray, Selena
De Koning, Jolanthe
Parkhurst, Graham
Lloyd, Liz
Greaves, Colin
Laventure, Robert
Fox, Kenneth R
author_facet Stathi, Afroditi
Withall, Janet
Thompson, Janice L
Davis, Mark G
Gray, Selena
De Koning, Jolanthe
Parkhurst, Graham
Lloyd, Liz
Greaves, Colin
Laventure, Robert
Fox, Kenneth R
author_sort Stathi, Afroditi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) is a theory-informed, pragmatic intervention using peer volunteering support to promote active ageing in socially disengaged, inactive older adults. This study aimed to establish ACE’s feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Fifty-four older adults were recruited as either peer volunteers (activators; n = 15) or participants (ACEs; n = 39). Participants were randomized to one-to-one support from an activator (ACEs-Intervention [ACEs-I]) or a waiting-list control group (ACEs-Control [ACEs-C]). Activators supported ACEs-I to get out more and engage with local activities. Objectively measured physical activity (PA), lower limb function, and number of out of house activities were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed changes in confidence to get out and about, social support, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of ACEs (mean age = 73.7 years [SD 7.3]) and all activators completed assessments at both baseline and post-intervention (6 months). ACEs-I reported more out of house activities (M [SD] = 6.34 [4.15]). ACEs-I increased physical function post-intervention (M [SD] = 9.8 [2.3]). ACEs-I reported improved well-being and vitality and increased confidence to get out and about, confidence in the face of specific barriers, knowledge of local initiatives, and perceived social support post-intervention. Activators, although sufficiently active at baseline, increased their PA further. ACE was well-accepted and easy to deliver. CONCLUSIONS: ACE is an acceptable and feasible intervention for helping socially disengaged older people to get out and about more, improve their confidence, and engage more with their community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7117619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71176192020-04-06 Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) Stathi, Afroditi Withall, Janet Thompson, Janice L Davis, Mark G Gray, Selena De Koning, Jolanthe Parkhurst, Graham Lloyd, Liz Greaves, Colin Laventure, Robert Fox, Kenneth R Gerontologist Intervention Research BACKGROUND: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged) is a theory-informed, pragmatic intervention using peer volunteering support to promote active ageing in socially disengaged, inactive older adults. This study aimed to establish ACE’s feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Fifty-four older adults were recruited as either peer volunteers (activators; n = 15) or participants (ACEs; n = 39). Participants were randomized to one-to-one support from an activator (ACEs-Intervention [ACEs-I]) or a waiting-list control group (ACEs-Control [ACEs-C]). Activators supported ACEs-I to get out more and engage with local activities. Objectively measured physical activity (PA), lower limb function, and number of out of house activities were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed changes in confidence to get out and about, social support, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of ACEs (mean age = 73.7 years [SD 7.3]) and all activators completed assessments at both baseline and post-intervention (6 months). ACEs-I reported more out of house activities (M [SD] = 6.34 [4.15]). ACEs-I increased physical function post-intervention (M [SD] = 9.8 [2.3]). ACEs-I reported improved well-being and vitality and increased confidence to get out and about, confidence in the face of specific barriers, knowledge of local initiatives, and perceived social support post-intervention. Activators, although sufficiently active at baseline, increased their PA further. ACE was well-accepted and easy to deliver. CONCLUSIONS: ACE is an acceptable and feasible intervention for helping socially disengaged older people to get out and about more, improve their confidence, and engage more with their community. Oxford University Press 2020-04 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7117619/ /pubmed/30779849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz003 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Intervention Research
Stathi, Afroditi
Withall, Janet
Thompson, Janice L
Davis, Mark G
Gray, Selena
De Koning, Jolanthe
Parkhurst, Graham
Lloyd, Liz
Greaves, Colin
Laventure, Robert
Fox, Kenneth R
Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)
title Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)
title_full Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)
title_fullStr Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)
title_short Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged)
title_sort feasibility trial evaluation of a peer volunteering active aging intervention: ace (active, connected, engaged)
topic Intervention Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz003
work_keys_str_mv AT stathiafroditi feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT withalljanet feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT thompsonjanicel feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT davismarkg feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT grayselena feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT dekoningjolanthe feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT parkhurstgraham feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT lloydliz feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT greavescolin feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT laventurerobert feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged
AT foxkennethr feasibilitytrialevaluationofapeervolunteeringactiveaginginterventionaceactiveconnectedengaged