Cargando…

855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children

Background and aims: The incidence of CMPA in infancy seems to be approximately 3%. In Italy diagnosis of CMPA is often over estimated. The double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge(DBPCFC) is widely considered as the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of food allergy. Methods: 14 patients, (12...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Accomando, S, Serraino, F, Antona, R, Ferlisi, A, Pellitteri, V, Leone, S, Matina, F, Liotta, A, Corsello, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117645/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-00855
_version_ 1783514412899893248
author Accomando, S
Serraino, F
Antona, R
Ferlisi, A
Pellitteri, V
Leone, S
Matina, F
Liotta, A
Corsello, G
author_facet Accomando, S
Serraino, F
Antona, R
Ferlisi, A
Pellitteri, V
Leone, S
Matina, F
Liotta, A
Corsello, G
author_sort Accomando, S
collection PubMed
description Background and aims: The incidence of CMPA in infancy seems to be approximately 3%. In Italy diagnosis of CMPA is often over estimated. The double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge(DBPCFC) is widely considered as the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of food allergy. Methods: 14 patients, (12 months-12 yrs) previously diagnosed as having CMPA, underwent our diagnostic algorithm in order to confirm or to exclude diagnosis. Diagnostic algorithm includes: total blood cell count, serum IgE assay, RAST, betalactotest, Prick by prick with fresh milk, chemical examination and eosinophilic cell count of the stools. DBPCFC was performed with extensively hydrolyzed formula (as placebo) VS a lactose-free, cow milk derived formula. At discharge a post challenge form was given to parents to record delayed symptoms that might occur at home. Results: 12 out of 14 patients had positive results for skin prick test (prick by prick) and four out of them also presented specific IgE against CMPs. 13 patients showed tolerance to CMP during and after DBPCFC and had no symptoms also in the next 72h. Only one patient, aged 30 months, had to keep CMP avoidance. Conclusion: In our survey DBPCFC demonstrated tolerance to CMP for all but one patients. DBPCFC is effective also to disconfirm diagnosis of CMPA. Skin prick tests and serological specific IgE do not always correlate with oral tolerance test. Subjects with positive skin prick test and high serological specific IgE against CMP but tolerant at DBPCFC may reintroduce cow milk proteins in to their dietary meals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7117645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71176452020-04-02 855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children Accomando, S Serraino, F Antona, R Ferlisi, A Pellitteri, V Leone, S Matina, F Liotta, A Corsello, G Pediatr Res Article Background and aims: The incidence of CMPA in infancy seems to be approximately 3%. In Italy diagnosis of CMPA is often over estimated. The double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge(DBPCFC) is widely considered as the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of food allergy. Methods: 14 patients, (12 months-12 yrs) previously diagnosed as having CMPA, underwent our diagnostic algorithm in order to confirm or to exclude diagnosis. Diagnostic algorithm includes: total blood cell count, serum IgE assay, RAST, betalactotest, Prick by prick with fresh milk, chemical examination and eosinophilic cell count of the stools. DBPCFC was performed with extensively hydrolyzed formula (as placebo) VS a lactose-free, cow milk derived formula. At discharge a post challenge form was given to parents to record delayed symptoms that might occur at home. Results: 12 out of 14 patients had positive results for skin prick test (prick by prick) and four out of them also presented specific IgE against CMPs. 13 patients showed tolerance to CMP during and after DBPCFC and had no symptoms also in the next 72h. Only one patient, aged 30 months, had to keep CMP avoidance. Conclusion: In our survey DBPCFC demonstrated tolerance to CMP for all but one patients. DBPCFC is effective also to disconfirm diagnosis of CMPA. Skin prick tests and serological specific IgE do not always correlate with oral tolerance test. Subjects with positive skin prick test and high serological specific IgE against CMP but tolerant at DBPCFC may reintroduce cow milk proteins in to their dietary meals. Nature Publishing Group US 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC7117645/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-00855 Text en © International Pediatrics Research Foundation, Inc. 2010 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Accomando, S
Serraino, F
Antona, R
Ferlisi, A
Pellitteri, V
Leone, S
Matina, F
Liotta, A
Corsello, G
855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children
title 855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children
title_full 855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children
title_fullStr 855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children
title_full_unstemmed 855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children
title_short 855 Double Blind Placebo Controlled Food Challenge Useful to Disconfirm Over Estimated Diagnosis of Cmpa in Children
title_sort 855 double blind placebo controlled food challenge useful to disconfirm over estimated diagnosis of cmpa in children
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117645/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-00855
work_keys_str_mv AT accomandos 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT serrainof 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT antonar 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT ferlisia 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT pellitteriv 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT leones 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT matinaf 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT liottaa 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren
AT corsellog 855doubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengeusefultodisconfirmoverestimateddiagnosisofcmpainchildren