Cargando…
Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes
PURPOSE: To test the repeatability and reproducibility of the topography module in posterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography with Revo NX (new device) and to compare keratometry values obtained by a Scheimpflug tomography (Galilei G6) and a swept source OCT (Casia 2). METHODS: I...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230589 |
_version_ | 1783514420735901696 |
---|---|
author | Wylęgała, Adam Mazur, Robert Bolek, Bartłomiej Wylęgała, Edward |
author_facet | Wylęgała, Adam Mazur, Robert Bolek, Bartłomiej Wylęgała, Edward |
author_sort | Wylęgała, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To test the repeatability and reproducibility of the topography module in posterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography with Revo NX (new device) and to compare keratometry values obtained by a Scheimpflug tomography (Galilei G6) and a swept source OCT (Casia 2). METHODS: In this prospective study, healthy subjects with nonoperated eyes had their central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior and posterior K1/K2 corneal power measured with the new device. Two operators made 6 measurements on the new device to check intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility, and measurement on Casia 2 and Galilei G6. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the devices for each analyzed variable. RESULTS: 94 eyes (94 patients) were studied. All devices produced significantly different mean CCT, the highest for Galilei 569.13±37.58 μm followed by Casia 545.00 ±36.15 μm and Revo 537.39±35.92 μm. The mean anterior K1 was 43.21 ± 1.37 for Casia 2 43.21 ± 1.55 for Revo NX and 43.19 ± 1.39 for Galilei G6, and the differences were insignificant p = 0.617. The posterior K1 for Revo NX was -5.77 ± 0.25 whereas for Casia 2 it was -5.98±0.22 and for Galilei G6–6.09±0.28 D p< 0.0001. The Revo NX showed intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.975 for the posterior K2 surface, and 0.994 for anterior K1 and 0.998 for CCT. CONCLUSIONS: Revo NX is independent of the user and offers a high level of repeatability for the anterior and posterior cornea. The wide range of differences between the devices suggests they should not be used interchangeably. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7117679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71176792020-04-09 Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes Wylęgała, Adam Mazur, Robert Bolek, Bartłomiej Wylęgała, Edward PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To test the repeatability and reproducibility of the topography module in posterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography with Revo NX (new device) and to compare keratometry values obtained by a Scheimpflug tomography (Galilei G6) and a swept source OCT (Casia 2). METHODS: In this prospective study, healthy subjects with nonoperated eyes had their central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior and posterior K1/K2 corneal power measured with the new device. Two operators made 6 measurements on the new device to check intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility, and measurement on Casia 2 and Galilei G6. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the devices for each analyzed variable. RESULTS: 94 eyes (94 patients) were studied. All devices produced significantly different mean CCT, the highest for Galilei 569.13±37.58 μm followed by Casia 545.00 ±36.15 μm and Revo 537.39±35.92 μm. The mean anterior K1 was 43.21 ± 1.37 for Casia 2 43.21 ± 1.55 for Revo NX and 43.19 ± 1.39 for Galilei G6, and the differences were insignificant p = 0.617. The posterior K1 for Revo NX was -5.77 ± 0.25 whereas for Casia 2 it was -5.98±0.22 and for Galilei G6–6.09±0.28 D p< 0.0001. The Revo NX showed intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.975 for the posterior K2 surface, and 0.994 for anterior K1 and 0.998 for CCT. CONCLUSIONS: Revo NX is independent of the user and offers a high level of repeatability for the anterior and posterior cornea. The wide range of differences between the devices suggests they should not be used interchangeably. Public Library of Science 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7117679/ /pubmed/32240192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230589 Text en © 2020 Wylęgała et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wylęgała, Adam Mazur, Robert Bolek, Bartłomiej Wylęgała, Edward Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes |
title | Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes |
title_full | Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes |
title_short | Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes |
title_sort | reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by revo nx, galilei g6 and casia 2 in normal eyes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wylegałaadam reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes AT mazurrobert reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes AT bolekbartłomiej reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes AT wylegałaedward reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes |