Cargando…

Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes

PURPOSE: To test the repeatability and reproducibility of the topography module in posterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography with Revo NX (new device) and to compare keratometry values obtained by a Scheimpflug tomography (Galilei G6) and a swept source OCT (Casia 2). METHODS: I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wylęgała, Adam, Mazur, Robert, Bolek, Bartłomiej, Wylęgała, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230589
_version_ 1783514420735901696
author Wylęgała, Adam
Mazur, Robert
Bolek, Bartłomiej
Wylęgała, Edward
author_facet Wylęgała, Adam
Mazur, Robert
Bolek, Bartłomiej
Wylęgała, Edward
author_sort Wylęgała, Adam
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To test the repeatability and reproducibility of the topography module in posterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography with Revo NX (new device) and to compare keratometry values obtained by a Scheimpflug tomography (Galilei G6) and a swept source OCT (Casia 2). METHODS: In this prospective study, healthy subjects with nonoperated eyes had their central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior and posterior K1/K2 corneal power measured with the new device. Two operators made 6 measurements on the new device to check intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility, and measurement on Casia 2 and Galilei G6. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the devices for each analyzed variable. RESULTS: 94 eyes (94 patients) were studied. All devices produced significantly different mean CCT, the highest for Galilei 569.13±37.58 μm followed by Casia 545.00 ±36.15 μm and Revo 537.39±35.92 μm. The mean anterior K1 was 43.21 ± 1.37 for Casia 2 43.21 ± 1.55 for Revo NX and 43.19 ± 1.39 for Galilei G6, and the differences were insignificant p = 0.617. The posterior K1 for Revo NX was -5.77 ± 0.25 whereas for Casia 2 it was -5.98±0.22 and for Galilei G6–6.09±0.28 D p< 0.0001. The Revo NX showed intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.975 for the posterior K2 surface, and 0.994 for anterior K1 and 0.998 for CCT. CONCLUSIONS: Revo NX is independent of the user and offers a high level of repeatability for the anterior and posterior cornea. The wide range of differences between the devices suggests they should not be used interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7117679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71176792020-04-09 Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes Wylęgała, Adam Mazur, Robert Bolek, Bartłomiej Wylęgała, Edward PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To test the repeatability and reproducibility of the topography module in posterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography with Revo NX (new device) and to compare keratometry values obtained by a Scheimpflug tomography (Galilei G6) and a swept source OCT (Casia 2). METHODS: In this prospective study, healthy subjects with nonoperated eyes had their central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior and posterior K1/K2 corneal power measured with the new device. Two operators made 6 measurements on the new device to check intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility, and measurement on Casia 2 and Galilei G6. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the devices for each analyzed variable. RESULTS: 94 eyes (94 patients) were studied. All devices produced significantly different mean CCT, the highest for Galilei 569.13±37.58 μm followed by Casia 545.00 ±36.15 μm and Revo 537.39±35.92 μm. The mean anterior K1 was 43.21 ± 1.37 for Casia 2 43.21 ± 1.55 for Revo NX and 43.19 ± 1.39 for Galilei G6, and the differences were insignificant p = 0.617. The posterior K1 for Revo NX was -5.77 ± 0.25 whereas for Casia 2 it was -5.98±0.22 and for Galilei G6–6.09±0.28 D p< 0.0001. The Revo NX showed intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.975 for the posterior K2 surface, and 0.994 for anterior K1 and 0.998 for CCT. CONCLUSIONS: Revo NX is independent of the user and offers a high level of repeatability for the anterior and posterior cornea. The wide range of differences between the devices suggests they should not be used interchangeably. Public Library of Science 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7117679/ /pubmed/32240192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230589 Text en © 2020 Wylęgała et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wylęgała, Adam
Mazur, Robert
Bolek, Bartłomiej
Wylęgała, Edward
Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes
title Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes
title_full Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes
title_fullStr Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes
title_short Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes
title_sort reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by revo nx, galilei g6 and casia 2 in normal eyes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230589
work_keys_str_mv AT wylegałaadam reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes
AT mazurrobert reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes
AT bolekbartłomiej reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes
AT wylegałaedward reproducibilityandrepeatabilityofcornealtopographymeasuredbyrevonxgalileig6andcasia2innormaleyes