Cargando…

Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study

OBJECTIVES: To identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients’ perspectives. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional single-center study. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital in A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Does, Albertine M. B., Kneepkens, Eva L., Uitvlugt, Elien B., Jansen, Sanne L., Schilder, Louise, Tokmaji, George, Wijers, Sofieke C., Radersma, Marijn, Heijnen, J. Nina M., Teunissen, Paul F. A., Hulshof, Pim B. J. E., Overvliet, Geke M., Siegert, Carl E. H., Karapinar-Çarkit, Fatma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229940
_version_ 1783514426596392960
author van der Does, Albertine M. B.
Kneepkens, Eva L.
Uitvlugt, Elien B.
Jansen, Sanne L.
Schilder, Louise
Tokmaji, George
Wijers, Sofieke C.
Radersma, Marijn
Heijnen, J. Nina M.
Teunissen, Paul F. A.
Hulshof, Pim B. J. E.
Overvliet, Geke M.
Siegert, Carl E. H.
Karapinar-Çarkit, Fatma
author_facet van der Does, Albertine M. B.
Kneepkens, Eva L.
Uitvlugt, Elien B.
Jansen, Sanne L.
Schilder, Louise
Tokmaji, George
Wijers, Sofieke C.
Radersma, Marijn
Heijnen, J. Nina M.
Teunissen, Paul F. A.
Hulshof, Pim B. J. E.
Overvliet, Geke M.
Siegert, Carl E. H.
Karapinar-Çarkit, Fatma
author_sort van der Does, Albertine M. B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients’ perspectives. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional single-center study. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 430 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, discharged from one of seven participating clinical departments and an unplanned readmission within 30 days. METHODS: Residents from the participating departments individually assessed whether the readmission was caused by healthcare, the preventability and possible causes of readmissions using a tool. Thereafter, the preventability of the cases was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with residents of all participating departments and clinical pharmacists. The primary outcome was the proportion of readmissions that were potentially preventable. Secondary outcomes were the determinants for a readmission, causes for preventable readmissions, the change in the final decision on preventability after the multidisciplinary meeting and the value of patient interviews in assessing preventability. Differences in characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and non-PPRs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 430 readmissions, 56 (13%) were assessed as PPRs. Age was significantly associated with a PPR (adjusted OR: 2.42; 95%, CI 1.23–4.74; p = 0.01). The main causes for PPRs were diagnostic (30%), medication (27%) and management problems (27%). During the multidisciplinary meeting, the final decision on preventability changed in 11% of the cases. When a patient interview was available, it was used as a source of information to assess preventability in 26% of readmissions. In 7% of cases, the patient interview was mentioned as the most important source. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: 13% of readmissions were potentially preventable with diagnostic, medication or management problems being main causes. A multidisciplinary review approach and including the patient’s perspective could contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of readmissions and possible improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7117704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71177042020-04-09 Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study van der Does, Albertine M. B. Kneepkens, Eva L. Uitvlugt, Elien B. Jansen, Sanne L. Schilder, Louise Tokmaji, George Wijers, Sofieke C. Radersma, Marijn Heijnen, J. Nina M. Teunissen, Paul F. A. Hulshof, Pim B. J. E. Overvliet, Geke M. Siegert, Carl E. H. Karapinar-Çarkit, Fatma PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients’ perspectives. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional single-center study. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 430 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, discharged from one of seven participating clinical departments and an unplanned readmission within 30 days. METHODS: Residents from the participating departments individually assessed whether the readmission was caused by healthcare, the preventability and possible causes of readmissions using a tool. Thereafter, the preventability of the cases was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with residents of all participating departments and clinical pharmacists. The primary outcome was the proportion of readmissions that were potentially preventable. Secondary outcomes were the determinants for a readmission, causes for preventable readmissions, the change in the final decision on preventability after the multidisciplinary meeting and the value of patient interviews in assessing preventability. Differences in characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and non-PPRs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 430 readmissions, 56 (13%) were assessed as PPRs. Age was significantly associated with a PPR (adjusted OR: 2.42; 95%, CI 1.23–4.74; p = 0.01). The main causes for PPRs were diagnostic (30%), medication (27%) and management problems (27%). During the multidisciplinary meeting, the final decision on preventability changed in 11% of the cases. When a patient interview was available, it was used as a source of information to assess preventability in 26% of readmissions. In 7% of cases, the patient interview was mentioned as the most important source. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: 13% of readmissions were potentially preventable with diagnostic, medication or management problems being main causes. A multidisciplinary review approach and including the patient’s perspective could contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of readmissions and possible improvements. Public Library of Science 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7117704/ /pubmed/32240185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229940 Text en © 2020 van der Does et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Does, Albertine M. B.
Kneepkens, Eva L.
Uitvlugt, Elien B.
Jansen, Sanne L.
Schilder, Louise
Tokmaji, George
Wijers, Sofieke C.
Radersma, Marijn
Heijnen, J. Nina M.
Teunissen, Paul F. A.
Hulshof, Pim B. J. E.
Overvliet, Geke M.
Siegert, Carl E. H.
Karapinar-Çarkit, Fatma
Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
title Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
title_full Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
title_fullStr Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
title_full_unstemmed Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
title_short Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
title_sort preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. a cross-sectional, single-center study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229940
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderdoesalbertinemb preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT kneepkenseval preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT uitvlugtelienb preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT jansensannel preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT schilderlouise preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT tokmajigeorge preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT wijerssofiekec preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT radersmamarijn preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT heijnenjninam preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT teunissenpaulfa preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT hulshofpimbje preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT overvlietgekem preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT siegertcarleh preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy
AT karapinarcarkitfatma preventabilityofunplannedreadmissionswithin30daysofdischargeacrosssectionalsinglecenterstudy