Cargando…

Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?

Temperature control during severe sepsis is currently used in intensive care and involves 66% and 70% of severe sepsis and septic shock, respectively. Nevertheless, the conclusive evidence of the benefit of such a strategy is still lacking.We might wonder, with regards to experimental works and rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seguin, P., Launey, Y., Nesseler, N., Malledant, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lavoisier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13546-015-1168-x
_version_ 1783514449082056704
author Seguin, P.
Launey, Y.
Nesseler, N.
Malledant, Y.
author_facet Seguin, P.
Launey, Y.
Nesseler, N.
Malledant, Y.
author_sort Seguin, P.
collection PubMed
description Temperature control during severe sepsis is currently used in intensive care and involves 66% and 70% of severe sepsis and septic shock, respectively. Nevertheless, the conclusive evidence of the benefit of such a strategy is still lacking.We might wonder, with regards to experimental works and recent noninterventional studies, about the risk of a control strategy on an ongoing infectious process, the patient’s outcome, and the safety of the means implemented to obtain temperature control. On the other hand, it is also demonstrated that fever increases oxygen consumption, which may lead in some clinical situations to tissular ischemia and that fever may be associated with a deleterious focal inflammatory process. Methods to control the temperature include external and/or internal cooling and/or antipyretic medications such as paracetamol and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. In septic patients, external cooling and paracetamol are the mains means used to control temperature. Despite the uncertainties about the benefit to control or not the temperature, it could be stated that extreme temperature (hypo- or hyperthermia) should be avoided and that the benefit/risk of temperature control must be individually weighted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7117820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lavoisier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71178202020-04-03 Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ? Seguin, P. Launey, Y. Nesseler, N. Malledant, Y. Reanimation Mise au Point / Update Temperature control during severe sepsis is currently used in intensive care and involves 66% and 70% of severe sepsis and septic shock, respectively. Nevertheless, the conclusive evidence of the benefit of such a strategy is still lacking.We might wonder, with regards to experimental works and recent noninterventional studies, about the risk of a control strategy on an ongoing infectious process, the patient’s outcome, and the safety of the means implemented to obtain temperature control. On the other hand, it is also demonstrated that fever increases oxygen consumption, which may lead in some clinical situations to tissular ischemia and that fever may be associated with a deleterious focal inflammatory process. Methods to control the temperature include external and/or internal cooling and/or antipyretic medications such as paracetamol and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. In septic patients, external cooling and paracetamol are the mains means used to control temperature. Despite the uncertainties about the benefit to control or not the temperature, it could be stated that extreme temperature (hypo- or hyperthermia) should be avoided and that the benefit/risk of temperature control must be individually weighted. Lavoisier 2016-03-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC7117820/ /pubmed/32288743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13546-015-1168-x Text en © Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF) and Springer-Verlag France 2015 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Mise au Point / Update
Seguin, P.
Launey, Y.
Nesseler, N.
Malledant, Y.
Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?
title Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?
title_full Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?
title_fullStr Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?
title_full_unstemmed Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?
title_short Faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?
title_sort faut-il contrôler la fièvre dans les infections sévères ?
topic Mise au Point / Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13546-015-1168-x
work_keys_str_mv AT seguinp fautilcontrolerlafievredanslesinfectionsseveres
AT launeyy fautilcontrolerlafievredanslesinfectionsseveres
AT nesselern fautilcontrolerlafievredanslesinfectionsseveres
AT malledanty fautilcontrolerlafievredanslesinfectionsseveres