Cargando…
Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress
Campylobacter spp. are one of the most important food-borne pathogens, which are quite susceptible to environmental or technological stressors compared to other zoonotic bacteria. This might be due to the lack of many stress response mechanisms described in other bacteria. Nevertheless, Campylobacte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32292399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00523 |
_version_ | 1783514513371299840 |
---|---|
author | Riedel, Carolin Förstner, Konrad U. Püning, Christoph Alter, Thomas Sharma, Cynthia M. Gölz, Greta |
author_facet | Riedel, Carolin Förstner, Konrad U. Püning, Christoph Alter, Thomas Sharma, Cynthia M. Gölz, Greta |
author_sort | Riedel, Carolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Campylobacter spp. are one of the most important food-borne pathogens, which are quite susceptible to environmental or technological stressors compared to other zoonotic bacteria. This might be due to the lack of many stress response mechanisms described in other bacteria. Nevertheless, Campylobacter is able to survive in the environment and food products. Although some aspects of the heat stress response in Campylobacter jejuni are already known, information about the stress response in other Campylobacter species are still scarce. In this study, the stress response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to elevated temperatures (46°C) was investigated by survival assays and whole transcriptome analysis. None of the strains survived at 46°C for more than 8 h and approximately 20% of the genes of C. coli RM2228 and C. lari RM2100 were differentially expressed. The transcriptomic profiles showed enhanced gene expression of several chaperones like dnaK, groES, groEL, and clpB in both strains, indicating a general involvement in the heat stress response within the Campylobacter species. However, the pronounced differences in the expression pattern between C. coli and C. lari suggest that stress response mechanisms described for one Campylobacter species might be not necessarily transferable to other Campylobacter species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7118207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71182072020-04-14 Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress Riedel, Carolin Förstner, Konrad U. Püning, Christoph Alter, Thomas Sharma, Cynthia M. Gölz, Greta Front Microbiol Microbiology Campylobacter spp. are one of the most important food-borne pathogens, which are quite susceptible to environmental or technological stressors compared to other zoonotic bacteria. This might be due to the lack of many stress response mechanisms described in other bacteria. Nevertheless, Campylobacter is able to survive in the environment and food products. Although some aspects of the heat stress response in Campylobacter jejuni are already known, information about the stress response in other Campylobacter species are still scarce. In this study, the stress response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to elevated temperatures (46°C) was investigated by survival assays and whole transcriptome analysis. None of the strains survived at 46°C for more than 8 h and approximately 20% of the genes of C. coli RM2228 and C. lari RM2100 were differentially expressed. The transcriptomic profiles showed enhanced gene expression of several chaperones like dnaK, groES, groEL, and clpB in both strains, indicating a general involvement in the heat stress response within the Campylobacter species. However, the pronounced differences in the expression pattern between C. coli and C. lari suggest that stress response mechanisms described for one Campylobacter species might be not necessarily transferable to other Campylobacter species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7118207/ /pubmed/32292399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00523 Text en Copyright © 2020 Riedel, Förstner, Püning, Alter, Sharma and Gölz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Riedel, Carolin Förstner, Konrad U. Püning, Christoph Alter, Thomas Sharma, Cynthia M. Gölz, Greta Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress |
title | Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress |
title_full | Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress |
title_fullStr | Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress |
title_short | Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress |
title_sort | differences in the transcriptomic response of campylobacter coli and campylobacter lari to heat stress |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32292399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riedelcarolin differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress AT forstnerkonradu differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress AT puningchristoph differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress AT alterthomas differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress AT sharmacynthiam differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress AT golzgreta differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress |