Cargando…

Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress

Campylobacter spp. are one of the most important food-borne pathogens, which are quite susceptible to environmental or technological stressors compared to other zoonotic bacteria. This might be due to the lack of many stress response mechanisms described in other bacteria. Nevertheless, Campylobacte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riedel, Carolin, Förstner, Konrad U., Püning, Christoph, Alter, Thomas, Sharma, Cynthia M., Gölz, Greta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32292399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00523
_version_ 1783514513371299840
author Riedel, Carolin
Förstner, Konrad U.
Püning, Christoph
Alter, Thomas
Sharma, Cynthia M.
Gölz, Greta
author_facet Riedel, Carolin
Förstner, Konrad U.
Püning, Christoph
Alter, Thomas
Sharma, Cynthia M.
Gölz, Greta
author_sort Riedel, Carolin
collection PubMed
description Campylobacter spp. are one of the most important food-borne pathogens, which are quite susceptible to environmental or technological stressors compared to other zoonotic bacteria. This might be due to the lack of many stress response mechanisms described in other bacteria. Nevertheless, Campylobacter is able to survive in the environment and food products. Although some aspects of the heat stress response in Campylobacter jejuni are already known, information about the stress response in other Campylobacter species are still scarce. In this study, the stress response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to elevated temperatures (46°C) was investigated by survival assays and whole transcriptome analysis. None of the strains survived at 46°C for more than 8 h and approximately 20% of the genes of C. coli RM2228 and C. lari RM2100 were differentially expressed. The transcriptomic profiles showed enhanced gene expression of several chaperones like dnaK, groES, groEL, and clpB in both strains, indicating a general involvement in the heat stress response within the Campylobacter species. However, the pronounced differences in the expression pattern between C. coli and C. lari suggest that stress response mechanisms described for one Campylobacter species might be not necessarily transferable to other Campylobacter species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7118207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71182072020-04-14 Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress Riedel, Carolin Förstner, Konrad U. Püning, Christoph Alter, Thomas Sharma, Cynthia M. Gölz, Greta Front Microbiol Microbiology Campylobacter spp. are one of the most important food-borne pathogens, which are quite susceptible to environmental or technological stressors compared to other zoonotic bacteria. This might be due to the lack of many stress response mechanisms described in other bacteria. Nevertheless, Campylobacter is able to survive in the environment and food products. Although some aspects of the heat stress response in Campylobacter jejuni are already known, information about the stress response in other Campylobacter species are still scarce. In this study, the stress response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to elevated temperatures (46°C) was investigated by survival assays and whole transcriptome analysis. None of the strains survived at 46°C for more than 8 h and approximately 20% of the genes of C. coli RM2228 and C. lari RM2100 were differentially expressed. The transcriptomic profiles showed enhanced gene expression of several chaperones like dnaK, groES, groEL, and clpB in both strains, indicating a general involvement in the heat stress response within the Campylobacter species. However, the pronounced differences in the expression pattern between C. coli and C. lari suggest that stress response mechanisms described for one Campylobacter species might be not necessarily transferable to other Campylobacter species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7118207/ /pubmed/32292399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00523 Text en Copyright © 2020 Riedel, Förstner, Püning, Alter, Sharma and Gölz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Riedel, Carolin
Förstner, Konrad U.
Püning, Christoph
Alter, Thomas
Sharma, Cynthia M.
Gölz, Greta
Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress
title Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress
title_full Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress
title_fullStr Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress
title_short Differences in the Transcriptomic Response of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari to Heat Stress
title_sort differences in the transcriptomic response of campylobacter coli and campylobacter lari to heat stress
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32292399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00523
work_keys_str_mv AT riedelcarolin differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress
AT forstnerkonradu differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress
AT puningchristoph differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress
AT alterthomas differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress
AT sharmacynthiam differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress
AT golzgreta differencesinthetranscriptomicresponseofcampylobactercoliandcampylobacterlaritoheatstress