Cargando…
Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Mental health services aim to provide recovery-focused care and facilitate coproduced care planning. In practice, mental health providers can find supporting individualized coproduced care with service users difficult while balancing administrative and performance demands. To help meet t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32191210 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14868 |
_version_ | 1783514583791566848 |
---|---|
author | Pithara, Christalla Farr, Michelle Sullivan, Sarah A Edwards, Hannah B Hall, William Gadd, Caroline Walker, Julian Hebden, Nick Horwood, Jeremy |
author_facet | Pithara, Christalla Farr, Michelle Sullivan, Sarah A Edwards, Hannah B Hall, William Gadd, Caroline Walker, Julian Hebden, Nick Horwood, Jeremy |
author_sort | Pithara, Christalla |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mental health services aim to provide recovery-focused care and facilitate coproduced care planning. In practice, mental health providers can find supporting individualized coproduced care with service users difficult while balancing administrative and performance demands. To help meet this aim and using principles of coproduction, an innovative mobile digital care pathway tool (CPT) was developed to be used on a tablet computer and piloted in the West of England. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine mental health care providers’ views of and experiences with the CPT during the pilot implementation phase and identify factors influencing its implementation. METHODS: A total of 20 in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with providers participating in the pilot and managers in the host organization. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, anonymized, and thematically analyzed guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: The tool was thought to facilitate coproduced recovery-focused care planning, a policy and organizational as well as professional priority. Internet connectivity issues, system interoperability, and access to service users’ health records affected use of the tool during mobile working. The organization’s resources, such as information technology (IT) infrastructure and staff time and IT culture, influenced implementation. Participants’ levels of use of the tool were dependent on knowledge of the tool and self-efficacy; perceived service-user needs and characteristics; and perceptions of impact on the therapeutic relationship. Training and preparation time influenced participants’ confidence in using the tool. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the importance of congruence between staff, organization, and external policy priorities and digital technologies in aiding intervention engagement, and the need for ongoing training and support of those intended to use the technology during and after the end of implementation interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7118546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71185462020-04-09 Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation Pithara, Christalla Farr, Michelle Sullivan, Sarah A Edwards, Hannah B Hall, William Gadd, Caroline Walker, Julian Hebden, Nick Horwood, Jeremy J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Mental health services aim to provide recovery-focused care and facilitate coproduced care planning. In practice, mental health providers can find supporting individualized coproduced care with service users difficult while balancing administrative and performance demands. To help meet this aim and using principles of coproduction, an innovative mobile digital care pathway tool (CPT) was developed to be used on a tablet computer and piloted in the West of England. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine mental health care providers’ views of and experiences with the CPT during the pilot implementation phase and identify factors influencing its implementation. METHODS: A total of 20 in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with providers participating in the pilot and managers in the host organization. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, anonymized, and thematically analyzed guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: The tool was thought to facilitate coproduced recovery-focused care planning, a policy and organizational as well as professional priority. Internet connectivity issues, system interoperability, and access to service users’ health records affected use of the tool during mobile working. The organization’s resources, such as information technology (IT) infrastructure and staff time and IT culture, influenced implementation. Participants’ levels of use of the tool were dependent on knowledge of the tool and self-efficacy; perceived service-user needs and characteristics; and perceptions of impact on the therapeutic relationship. Training and preparation time influenced participants’ confidence in using the tool. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the importance of congruence between staff, organization, and external policy priorities and digital technologies in aiding intervention engagement, and the need for ongoing training and support of those intended to use the technology during and after the end of implementation interventions. JMIR Publications 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7118546/ /pubmed/32191210 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14868 Text en ©Christalla Pithara, Michelle Farr, Sarah A Sullivan, Hannah B Edwards, William Hall, Caroline Gadd, Julian Walker, Nick Hebden, Jeremy Horwood. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 19.03.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Pithara, Christalla Farr, Michelle Sullivan, Sarah A Edwards, Hannah B Hall, William Gadd, Caroline Walker, Julian Hebden, Nick Horwood, Jeremy Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation |
title | Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation |
title_full | Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation |
title_short | Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation |
title_sort | implementing a digital tool to support shared care planning in community-based mental health services: qualitative evaluation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32191210 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14868 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pitharachristalla implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT farrmichelle implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT sullivansaraha implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT edwardshannahb implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT hallwilliam implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT gaddcaroline implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT walkerjulian implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT hebdennick implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation AT horwoodjeremy implementingadigitaltooltosupportsharedcareplanningincommunitybasedmentalhealthservicesqualitativeevaluation |