Cargando…
Pandethics
This paper explains the ethical importance of infectious diseases, and reviews four major ethical issues associated with pandemic influenza: the obligation of individuals to avoid infecting others, healthcare workers' ‘duty to treat’, allocation of scarce resources, and coercive social distanci...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.005 |
_version_ | 1783514628594073600 |
---|---|
author | Selgelid, M.J. |
author_facet | Selgelid, M.J. |
author_sort | Selgelid, M.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper explains the ethical importance of infectious diseases, and reviews four major ethical issues associated with pandemic influenza: the obligation of individuals to avoid infecting others, healthcare workers' ‘duty to treat’, allocation of scarce resources, and coercive social distancing measures. In each case, ways in which the ethical issues turn on both philosophical and empirical questions are highlighted. The paper concludes that ethicists should play a greater role in identifying ethically important empirical questions, and that scientists should take the ethical as well as the scientific importance of such questions into consideration when choosing research projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7118760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71187602020-04-03 Pandethics Selgelid, M.J. Public Health Article This paper explains the ethical importance of infectious diseases, and reviews four major ethical issues associated with pandemic influenza: the obligation of individuals to avoid infecting others, healthcare workers' ‘duty to treat’, allocation of scarce resources, and coercive social distancing measures. In each case, ways in which the ethical issues turn on both philosophical and empirical questions are highlighted. The paper concludes that ethicists should play a greater role in identifying ethically important empirical questions, and that scientists should take the ethical as well as the scientific importance of such questions into consideration when choosing research projects. The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2009-03 2009-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7118760/ /pubmed/19223051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.005 Text en Copyright © 2008 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Selgelid, M.J. Pandethics |
title | Pandethics |
title_full | Pandethics |
title_fullStr | Pandethics |
title_full_unstemmed | Pandethics |
title_short | Pandethics |
title_sort | pandethics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT selgelidmj pandethics |