Cargando…

Pandethics

This paper explains the ethical importance of infectious diseases, and reviews four major ethical issues associated with pandemic influenza: the obligation of individuals to avoid infecting others, healthcare workers' ‘duty to treat’, allocation of scarce resources, and coercive social distanci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Selgelid, M.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.005
_version_ 1783514628594073600
author Selgelid, M.J.
author_facet Selgelid, M.J.
author_sort Selgelid, M.J.
collection PubMed
description This paper explains the ethical importance of infectious diseases, and reviews four major ethical issues associated with pandemic influenza: the obligation of individuals to avoid infecting others, healthcare workers' ‘duty to treat’, allocation of scarce resources, and coercive social distancing measures. In each case, ways in which the ethical issues turn on both philosophical and empirical questions are highlighted. The paper concludes that ethicists should play a greater role in identifying ethically important empirical questions, and that scientists should take the ethical as well as the scientific importance of such questions into consideration when choosing research projects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7118760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71187602020-04-03 Pandethics Selgelid, M.J. Public Health Article This paper explains the ethical importance of infectious diseases, and reviews four major ethical issues associated with pandemic influenza: the obligation of individuals to avoid infecting others, healthcare workers' ‘duty to treat’, allocation of scarce resources, and coercive social distancing measures. In each case, ways in which the ethical issues turn on both philosophical and empirical questions are highlighted. The paper concludes that ethicists should play a greater role in identifying ethically important empirical questions, and that scientists should take the ethical as well as the scientific importance of such questions into consideration when choosing research projects. The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2009-03 2009-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7118760/ /pubmed/19223051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.005 Text en Copyright © 2008 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Selgelid, M.J.
Pandethics
title Pandethics
title_full Pandethics
title_fullStr Pandethics
title_full_unstemmed Pandethics
title_short Pandethics
title_sort pandethics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT selgelidmj pandethics