Cargando…

Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine

BACKGROUND: Cortical thickness measures the width of gray matter of the human cortex. It can be calculated from T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI). In group studies, this measure has been shown to correlate with the diagnosis/prognosis of a number of neurologic and psychiatric conditions, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tahedl, Marlene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02317-9
_version_ 1783514655778406400
author Tahedl, Marlene
author_facet Tahedl, Marlene
author_sort Tahedl, Marlene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cortical thickness measures the width of gray matter of the human cortex. It can be calculated from T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI). In group studies, this measure has been shown to correlate with the diagnosis/prognosis of a number of neurologic and psychiatric conditions, but has not been widely adapted for clinical routine. One of the reasons for this might be that there is no reference system which allows to rate individual cortical thickness data with respect to a control population. METHODS: To address this problem, this study compared different methods to assess statistical significance of cortical thinning, i.e. atrophy. All compared methods were nonparametric and encompassed rating an individual subject’s data set with respect to a control data population. Null distributions were calculated using data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP, n = 1000), and an additional HCP data set (n = 113) was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity to compare the different methods, whereas atrophy was simulated for sensitivity assessment. Validation measures were calculated for the entire cortex (“cumulative”) and distinct brain regions (“regional”) where possible. RESULTS: The approach yielding the highest combination of specificity and sensitivity implemented generating null distributions for anatomically distinct brain regions, based on the most extreme values observed in the population. With that method, while regional variations were observed, cumulative specificity of 98.9% and cumulative sensitivity at 80% was achieved for simulated atrophy of 23%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that validated rating of individual cortical thickness measures is possible, which can help clinicians in their daily routine to discover signs of atrophy before they become visually apparent on an unprocessed MRI. Furthermore, given different pathologies present with distinct atrophy patterns, the regional validation proposed here allows to detect distinct patterns of atrophy, which can further enhance differential diagnosis/prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7118882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71188822020-04-07 Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine Tahedl, Marlene J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Cortical thickness measures the width of gray matter of the human cortex. It can be calculated from T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI). In group studies, this measure has been shown to correlate with the diagnosis/prognosis of a number of neurologic and psychiatric conditions, but has not been widely adapted for clinical routine. One of the reasons for this might be that there is no reference system which allows to rate individual cortical thickness data with respect to a control population. METHODS: To address this problem, this study compared different methods to assess statistical significance of cortical thinning, i.e. atrophy. All compared methods were nonparametric and encompassed rating an individual subject’s data set with respect to a control data population. Null distributions were calculated using data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP, n = 1000), and an additional HCP data set (n = 113) was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity to compare the different methods, whereas atrophy was simulated for sensitivity assessment. Validation measures were calculated for the entire cortex (“cumulative”) and distinct brain regions (“regional”) where possible. RESULTS: The approach yielding the highest combination of specificity and sensitivity implemented generating null distributions for anatomically distinct brain regions, based on the most extreme values observed in the population. With that method, while regional variations were observed, cumulative specificity of 98.9% and cumulative sensitivity at 80% was achieved for simulated atrophy of 23%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that validated rating of individual cortical thickness measures is possible, which can help clinicians in their daily routine to discover signs of atrophy before they become visually apparent on an unprocessed MRI. Furthermore, given different pathologies present with distinct atrophy patterns, the regional validation proposed here allows to detect distinct patterns of atrophy, which can further enhance differential diagnosis/prognosis. BioMed Central 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7118882/ /pubmed/32245485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02317-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tahedl, Marlene
Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine
title Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine
title_full Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine
title_fullStr Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine
title_full_unstemmed Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine
title_short Towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine
title_sort towards individualized cortical thickness assessment for clinical routine
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02317-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tahedlmarlene towardsindividualizedcorticalthicknessassessmentforclinicalroutine