Cargando…
Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes
BACKGROUND: The Eating Disorder Examination – Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS) was developed as a 12-item version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) with a 4-point response scale that assesses eating disorder (ED) symptoms over the preceding 7 days. It has demonstrated good psychom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02565-5 |
_version_ | 1783514666993975296 |
---|---|
author | Prnjak, Katarina Mitchison, Deborah Griffiths, Scott Mond, Jonathan Gideon, Nicole Serpell, Lucy Hay, Phillipa |
author_facet | Prnjak, Katarina Mitchison, Deborah Griffiths, Scott Mond, Jonathan Gideon, Nicole Serpell, Lucy Hay, Phillipa |
author_sort | Prnjak, Katarina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Eating Disorder Examination – Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS) was developed as a 12-item version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) with a 4-point response scale that assesses eating disorder (ED) symptoms over the preceding 7 days. It has demonstrated good psychometric properties at initial testing. The purpose of this brief report is to determine a threshold score that could be used in screening for probable ED cases in community settings. METHODS: Data collected from Gideon et al. (2016) were re-analyzed. In their study, 559 participants (80.86% female; 9.66% self-reported ED diagnosis) completed the EDE-Q, EDE-QS, SCOFF, and Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA). Discriminatory power was compared between ED instruments using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: A score of 15 emerged as the threshold that ensured the best trade-off between sensitivity (.83) and specificity (.85), and good positive predictive value (.37) for the EDE-QS, with discriminatory power comparable to other ED instruments. CONCLUSION: The EDE-QS appears to be an instrument with good discriminatory power that could be used for ED screening purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7118929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71189292020-04-07 Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes Prnjak, Katarina Mitchison, Deborah Griffiths, Scott Mond, Jonathan Gideon, Nicole Serpell, Lucy Hay, Phillipa BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The Eating Disorder Examination – Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS) was developed as a 12-item version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) with a 4-point response scale that assesses eating disorder (ED) symptoms over the preceding 7 days. It has demonstrated good psychometric properties at initial testing. The purpose of this brief report is to determine a threshold score that could be used in screening for probable ED cases in community settings. METHODS: Data collected from Gideon et al. (2016) were re-analyzed. In their study, 559 participants (80.86% female; 9.66% self-reported ED diagnosis) completed the EDE-Q, EDE-QS, SCOFF, and Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA). Discriminatory power was compared between ED instruments using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: A score of 15 emerged as the threshold that ensured the best trade-off between sensitivity (.83) and specificity (.85), and good positive predictive value (.37) for the EDE-QS, with discriminatory power comparable to other ED instruments. CONCLUSION: The EDE-QS appears to be an instrument with good discriminatory power that could be used for ED screening purposes. BioMed Central 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7118929/ /pubmed/32245441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02565-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Prnjak, Katarina Mitchison, Deborah Griffiths, Scott Mond, Jonathan Gideon, Nicole Serpell, Lucy Hay, Phillipa Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes |
title | Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes |
title_full | Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes |
title_fullStr | Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes |
title_full_unstemmed | Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes |
title_short | Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes |
title_sort | further development of the 12-item ede-qs: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02565-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prnjakkatarina furtherdevelopmentofthe12itemedeqsidentifyingacutoffforscreeningpurposes AT mitchisondeborah furtherdevelopmentofthe12itemedeqsidentifyingacutoffforscreeningpurposes AT griffithsscott furtherdevelopmentofthe12itemedeqsidentifyingacutoffforscreeningpurposes AT mondjonathan furtherdevelopmentofthe12itemedeqsidentifyingacutoffforscreeningpurposes AT gideonnicole furtherdevelopmentofthe12itemedeqsidentifyingacutoffforscreeningpurposes AT serpelllucy furtherdevelopmentofthe12itemedeqsidentifyingacutoffforscreeningpurposes AT hayphillipa furtherdevelopmentofthe12itemedeqsidentifyingacutoffforscreeningpurposes |