Cargando…
Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture
Three-dimensional culture systems that allow generation of monolayered epithelial cell spheroids are widely used to study epithelial function in vitro. Epithelial spheroid formation is applied to address cellular consequences of (mono)-genetic disorders, that is, ciliopathies, in toxicity testing, o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7119422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32292417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00248 |
_version_ | 1783514764385714176 |
---|---|
author | Soetje, Birga Fuellekrug, Joachim Haffner, Dieter Ziegler, Wolfgang H. |
author_facet | Soetje, Birga Fuellekrug, Joachim Haffner, Dieter Ziegler, Wolfgang H. |
author_sort | Soetje, Birga |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three-dimensional culture systems that allow generation of monolayered epithelial cell spheroids are widely used to study epithelial function in vitro. Epithelial spheroid formation is applied to address cellular consequences of (mono)-genetic disorders, that is, ciliopathies, in toxicity testing, or to develop treatment options aimed to restore proper epithelial cell characteristics and function. With the potential of a high-throughput method, the main obstacle to efficient application of the spheroid formation assay so far is the laborious, time-consuming, and bias-prone analysis of spheroid images by individuals. Hundredths of multidimensional fluorescence images are blinded, rated by three persons, and subsequently, differences in ratings are compared and discussed. Here, we apply supervised learning and compare strategies based on machine learning versus deep learning. While deep learning approaches can directly process raw image data, machine learning requires transformed data of features extracted from fluorescence images. We verify the accuracy of both strategies on a validation data set, analyse an experimental data set, and observe that different strategies can be very accurate. Deep learning, however, is less sensitive to overfitting and experimental batch-to-batch variations, thus providing a rather powerful and easily adjustable classification tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7119422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71194222020-04-14 Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture Soetje, Birga Fuellekrug, Joachim Haffner, Dieter Ziegler, Wolfgang H. Front Genet Genetics Three-dimensional culture systems that allow generation of monolayered epithelial cell spheroids are widely used to study epithelial function in vitro. Epithelial spheroid formation is applied to address cellular consequences of (mono)-genetic disorders, that is, ciliopathies, in toxicity testing, or to develop treatment options aimed to restore proper epithelial cell characteristics and function. With the potential of a high-throughput method, the main obstacle to efficient application of the spheroid formation assay so far is the laborious, time-consuming, and bias-prone analysis of spheroid images by individuals. Hundredths of multidimensional fluorescence images are blinded, rated by three persons, and subsequently, differences in ratings are compared and discussed. Here, we apply supervised learning and compare strategies based on machine learning versus deep learning. While deep learning approaches can directly process raw image data, machine learning requires transformed data of features extracted from fluorescence images. We verify the accuracy of both strategies on a validation data set, analyse an experimental data set, and observe that different strategies can be very accurate. Deep learning, however, is less sensitive to overfitting and experimental batch-to-batch variations, thus providing a rather powerful and easily adjustable classification tool. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7119422/ /pubmed/32292417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00248 Text en Copyright © 2020 Soetje, Fuellekrug, Haffner and Ziegler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Soetje, Birga Fuellekrug, Joachim Haffner, Dieter Ziegler, Wolfgang H. Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture |
title | Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture |
title_full | Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture |
title_fullStr | Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture |
title_full_unstemmed | Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture |
title_short | Application and Comparison of Supervised Learning Strategies to Classify Polarity of Epithelial Cell Spheroids in 3D Culture |
title_sort | application and comparison of supervised learning strategies to classify polarity of epithelial cell spheroids in 3d culture |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7119422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32292417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soetjebirga applicationandcomparisonofsupervisedlearningstrategiestoclassifypolarityofepithelialcellspheroidsin3dculture AT fuellekrugjoachim applicationandcomparisonofsupervisedlearningstrategiestoclassifypolarityofepithelialcellspheroidsin3dculture AT haffnerdieter applicationandcomparisonofsupervisedlearningstrategiestoclassifypolarityofepithelialcellspheroidsin3dculture AT zieglerwolfgangh applicationandcomparisonofsupervisedlearningstrategiestoclassifypolarityofepithelialcellspheroidsin3dculture |