Cargando…

Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral respiratory infections is crucial for patient management. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) is used increasingly to diagnose respiratory infections and has shown to be more sensitive than viral culture and antigen detection. Obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choudhary, Manohar L., Anand, Siddharth P., Heydari, Mostafa, Rane, Grishma, Potdar, Varsha A., Chadha, Mandeep S., Mishra, Akhilesh C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7119668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23313883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.017
_version_ 1783514811775057920
author Choudhary, Manohar L.
Anand, Siddharth P.
Heydari, Mostafa
Rane, Grishma
Potdar, Varsha A.
Chadha, Mandeep S.
Mishra, Akhilesh C.
author_facet Choudhary, Manohar L.
Anand, Siddharth P.
Heydari, Mostafa
Rane, Grishma
Potdar, Varsha A.
Chadha, Mandeep S.
Mishra, Akhilesh C.
author_sort Choudhary, Manohar L.
collection PubMed
description Rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral respiratory infections is crucial for patient management. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) is used increasingly to diagnose respiratory infections and has shown to be more sensitive than viral culture and antigen detection. Objective of the present study was to develop a one-step mRT-PCR that could detect 18 respiratory viruses in three sets. The method was compared with real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for its sensitivity and specificity. Clinical specimens from 843 pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms were used in the study. 503 (59.7%) samples were detected positive by mRT-PCR. Of these 462 (54.8%) exhibited presence of a single pathogen and 41 (4.9%) had multiple pathogens. rRT-PCR detected 439 (52.1%) positive samples, where 419 (49.7%) exhibited one virus and 20 (2.4%) showed co-infections. Concordance between mRT-PCR and rRT-PCR was 91.9% and kappa correlation 0.837. Sensitivity and specificity of mRT-PCR were 99.5% and 83.7% while that of rRT-PCR was 86.9% and 99.4% respectively. Rhinovirus (17.2%) was the most frequently detected virus followed by respiratory syncytial virus B (15.4%), H1N1pdm09 (8.54%), parainfluenza virus-3 (5.8%) and metapneumovirus (5.2%). In conclusion, mRT-PCR is a rapid, cost effective, specific and highly sensitive method for detection of respiratory viruses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7119668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71196682020-04-08 Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR Choudhary, Manohar L. Anand, Siddharth P. Heydari, Mostafa Rane, Grishma Potdar, Varsha A. Chadha, Mandeep S. Mishra, Akhilesh C. J Virol Methods Article Rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral respiratory infections is crucial for patient management. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) is used increasingly to diagnose respiratory infections and has shown to be more sensitive than viral culture and antigen detection. Objective of the present study was to develop a one-step mRT-PCR that could detect 18 respiratory viruses in three sets. The method was compared with real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for its sensitivity and specificity. Clinical specimens from 843 pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms were used in the study. 503 (59.7%) samples were detected positive by mRT-PCR. Of these 462 (54.8%) exhibited presence of a single pathogen and 41 (4.9%) had multiple pathogens. rRT-PCR detected 439 (52.1%) positive samples, where 419 (49.7%) exhibited one virus and 20 (2.4%) showed co-infections. Concordance between mRT-PCR and rRT-PCR was 91.9% and kappa correlation 0.837. Sensitivity and specificity of mRT-PCR were 99.5% and 83.7% while that of rRT-PCR was 86.9% and 99.4% respectively. Rhinovirus (17.2%) was the most frequently detected virus followed by respiratory syncytial virus B (15.4%), H1N1pdm09 (8.54%), parainfluenza virus-3 (5.8%) and metapneumovirus (5.2%). In conclusion, mRT-PCR is a rapid, cost effective, specific and highly sensitive method for detection of respiratory viruses. Elsevier B.V. 2013-04 2013-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7119668/ /pubmed/23313883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.017 Text en Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Choudhary, Manohar L.
Anand, Siddharth P.
Heydari, Mostafa
Rane, Grishma
Potdar, Varsha A.
Chadha, Mandeep S.
Mishra, Akhilesh C.
Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR
title Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_full Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_fullStr Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_full_unstemmed Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_short Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_sort development of a multiplex one step rt-pcr that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time rt-pcr
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7119668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23313883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.017
work_keys_str_mv AT choudharymanoharl developmentofamultiplexonesteprtpcrthatdetectseighteenrespiratoryvirusesinclinicalspecimensandcomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT anandsiddharthp developmentofamultiplexonesteprtpcrthatdetectseighteenrespiratoryvirusesinclinicalspecimensandcomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT heydarimostafa developmentofamultiplexonesteprtpcrthatdetectseighteenrespiratoryvirusesinclinicalspecimensandcomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT ranegrishma developmentofamultiplexonesteprtpcrthatdetectseighteenrespiratoryvirusesinclinicalspecimensandcomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT potdarvarshaa developmentofamultiplexonesteprtpcrthatdetectseighteenrespiratoryvirusesinclinicalspecimensandcomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT chadhamandeeps developmentofamultiplexonesteprtpcrthatdetectseighteenrespiratoryvirusesinclinicalspecimensandcomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT mishraakhileshc developmentofamultiplexonesteprtpcrthatdetectseighteenrespiratoryvirusesinclinicalspecimensandcomparisonwithrealtimertpcr