Cargando…

Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside

Sepsis is a common disease in intensive care medicine representing almost one third of patient admissions. Its incidence has substantially increased over the past decades and overall mortality has declined during this period of time. It was reported that sepsis incidence increased from 82.7 to 240.4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurtado, F. J., Buroni, M., Tenzi, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120313/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1436-7_25
_version_ 1783514945419214848
author Hurtado, F. J.
Buroni, M.
Tenzi, J.
author_facet Hurtado, F. J.
Buroni, M.
Tenzi, J.
author_sort Hurtado, F. J.
collection PubMed
description Sepsis is a common disease in intensive care medicine representing almost one third of patient admissions. Its incidence has substantially increased over the past decades and overall mortality has declined during this period of time. It was reported that sepsis incidence increased from 82.7 to 240.4 per 100,000 population between 1979–2000. At the same time, sepsis global mortality decreased from 27.8 to 17.9% [1–3]. However, the absolute number of deaths significantly increased from 21.9 to 43.9 per 100,000 population. Male gender, some chronic diseases like diabetes, immunosuppressive states, human immunodeficiency virus infections, and malignancies are factors that increase the risk for sepsis. Some particular conditions like progressive number of organ dysfunctions, in-hospital-acquired infections and increasing age are associated with higher risk of death [1,4]. On the other hand, septic shock mortality only diminished from 61.6 to 53.1% [5]. This slight decline in mortality observed during recent decades could be attributable to improvements in supportive care and/or avoidance of iatrogenic complications. For example, the instrumentation of early goal resuscitation protocols not aiming at supranormal targets for cardiac output and oxygen delivery, and the use of lung protective strategies could explain at least in part this favorable change. Other strategies directed to treat the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the septic process like recombinant human-activated protein-C (rhAPC), have also contributed to improve survival. However, mortality remains unacceptably high and further improvement in sepsis management is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7120313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71203132020-04-06 Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside Hurtado, F. J. Buroni, M. Tenzi, J. Intensive and Critical Care Medicine Article Sepsis is a common disease in intensive care medicine representing almost one third of patient admissions. Its incidence has substantially increased over the past decades and overall mortality has declined during this period of time. It was reported that sepsis incidence increased from 82.7 to 240.4 per 100,000 population between 1979–2000. At the same time, sepsis global mortality decreased from 27.8 to 17.9% [1–3]. However, the absolute number of deaths significantly increased from 21.9 to 43.9 per 100,000 population. Male gender, some chronic diseases like diabetes, immunosuppressive states, human immunodeficiency virus infections, and malignancies are factors that increase the risk for sepsis. Some particular conditions like progressive number of organ dysfunctions, in-hospital-acquired infections and increasing age are associated with higher risk of death [1,4]. On the other hand, septic shock mortality only diminished from 61.6 to 53.1% [5]. This slight decline in mortality observed during recent decades could be attributable to improvements in supportive care and/or avoidance of iatrogenic complications. For example, the instrumentation of early goal resuscitation protocols not aiming at supranormal targets for cardiac output and oxygen delivery, and the use of lung protective strategies could explain at least in part this favorable change. Other strategies directed to treat the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the septic process like recombinant human-activated protein-C (rhAPC), have also contributed to improve survival. However, mortality remains unacceptably high and further improvement in sepsis management is needed. 2009-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7120313/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1436-7_25 Text en © Springer-Verlag Italia 2009 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Hurtado, F. J.
Buroni, M.
Tenzi, J.
Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside
title Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside
title_full Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside
title_fullStr Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside
title_full_unstemmed Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside
title_short Sepsis: Clinical Approach, Evidence-Based at the Bedside
title_sort sepsis: clinical approach, evidence-based at the bedside
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120313/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1436-7_25
work_keys_str_mv AT hurtadofj sepsisclinicalapproachevidencebasedatthebedside
AT buronim sepsisclinicalapproachevidencebasedatthebedside
AT tenzij sepsisclinicalapproachevidencebasedatthebedside