Cargando…
Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling
Increase in the use and development of computational tools to govern public health risks invites us to study their benefits and limitations. To analyze how risk is perceived and expressed through these tools is relevant to risk theory. This chapter clarifies the different concepts of risk, contrasti...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7121843/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_9 |
_version_ | 1783515291728216064 |
---|---|
author | Mansnerus, Erika |
author_facet | Mansnerus, Erika |
author_sort | Mansnerus, Erika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increase in the use and development of computational tools to govern public health risks invites us to study their benefits and limitations. To analyze how risk is perceived and expressed through these tools is relevant to risk theory. This chapter clarifies the different concepts of risk, contrasting especially the mathematically expressed ones with culturally informed notions, which address a broader view on risk. I will suggest that a fruitful way to contextualize computational tools, such mathematical models in risk assessment is “analytics of risk,” which ties together the technological, epistemological, and political dimensions of the process of governance of risk. I will clarify the development of mathematical modeling techniques through their use in infectious disease epidemiology. Epidemiological modeling functions as a form of “risk calculation,” which provides predictions of the infectious outbreak in question. These calculations help direct and design preventive actions toward the health outcomes of populations. This chapter analyzes two cases in which modeling methods are used for explanation-based and scenario-building predictions in order to anticipate the risks of infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b bacteria and A(H1N1) pandemic influenza virus. I will address an interesting tension that arises when model-based estimates exemplify the population-level reasoning of public health risks but has restricted capacity to address risks on individual level. Analyzing this tension will lead to a fuller account to understand the benefits and limitations of computational tools in the governance of public health risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7121843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71218432020-04-06 Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling Mansnerus, Erika Handbook of Risk Theory Article Increase in the use and development of computational tools to govern public health risks invites us to study their benefits and limitations. To analyze how risk is perceived and expressed through these tools is relevant to risk theory. This chapter clarifies the different concepts of risk, contrasting especially the mathematically expressed ones with culturally informed notions, which address a broader view on risk. I will suggest that a fruitful way to contextualize computational tools, such mathematical models in risk assessment is “analytics of risk,” which ties together the technological, epistemological, and political dimensions of the process of governance of risk. I will clarify the development of mathematical modeling techniques through their use in infectious disease epidemiology. Epidemiological modeling functions as a form of “risk calculation,” which provides predictions of the infectious outbreak in question. These calculations help direct and design preventive actions toward the health outcomes of populations. This chapter analyzes two cases in which modeling methods are used for explanation-based and scenario-building predictions in order to anticipate the risks of infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b bacteria and A(H1N1) pandemic influenza virus. I will address an interesting tension that arises when model-based estimates exemplify the population-level reasoning of public health risks but has restricted capacity to address risks on individual level. Analyzing this tension will lead to a fuller account to understand the benefits and limitations of computational tools in the governance of public health risks. 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC7121843/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_9 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Mansnerus, Erika Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling |
title | Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling |
title_full | Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling |
title_fullStr | Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling |
title_short | Understanding and Governing Public Health Risks by Modeling |
title_sort | understanding and governing public health risks by modeling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7121843/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mansneruserika understandingandgoverningpublichealthrisksbymodeling |