Cargando…
Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures
The first steps in tissue culture are dating back to the beginning of the nineteenth century when biosafety measures did not yet exist. Later on, animal cell culture became essential for scientific research, diagnosis and biotechnological activities. Along with this development, biosafety concerns h...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122109/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_22 |
_version_ | 1783515346226905088 |
---|---|
author | Herman, Philippe Pauwels, Katia |
author_facet | Herman, Philippe Pauwels, Katia |
author_sort | Herman, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | The first steps in tissue culture are dating back to the beginning of the nineteenth century when biosafety measures did not yet exist. Later on, animal cell culture became essential for scientific research, diagnosis and biotechnological activities. Along with this development, biosafety concerns have emerged pointing to the risks for human health and in a lesser extent for the environment associated to the handling of animal cell cultures. The management of these risks requires a thorough risk assessment of both the cell cultures and the type of manipulation prior the start of any activity. It involves a case-by-case evaluation of both the intrinsic properties of the cell culture genetically modified or not and the probability that it may inadvertently or intentionally become infected with pathogenic micro-organisms. The latter hazard is predominant when adventitious contaminants are pathogenic or have a better capacity to persist in unfavourable conditions. Consequently, most of the containment measures primarily aim at protecting cells from adventitious contamination. Cell cultures known to harbour an infectious etiologic agent should be manipulated in compliance with containment measures recommended for the etiologic agent itself. The manipulation of cell cultures from human or primate origin necessitates the use of a type II biosafety cabinet. The scope of this chapter is to highlight aspects relevant for the risk assessment and to summarize the main biosafety recommendations and the recent technological advances allowing a mitigation of the risk for the handling of animal cell cultures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7122109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71221092020-04-06 Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures Herman, Philippe Pauwels, Katia Animal Cell Culture Article The first steps in tissue culture are dating back to the beginning of the nineteenth century when biosafety measures did not yet exist. Later on, animal cell culture became essential for scientific research, diagnosis and biotechnological activities. Along with this development, biosafety concerns have emerged pointing to the risks for human health and in a lesser extent for the environment associated to the handling of animal cell cultures. The management of these risks requires a thorough risk assessment of both the cell cultures and the type of manipulation prior the start of any activity. It involves a case-by-case evaluation of both the intrinsic properties of the cell culture genetically modified or not and the probability that it may inadvertently or intentionally become infected with pathogenic micro-organisms. The latter hazard is predominant when adventitious contaminants are pathogenic or have a better capacity to persist in unfavourable conditions. Consequently, most of the containment measures primarily aim at protecting cells from adventitious contamination. Cell cultures known to harbour an infectious etiologic agent should be manipulated in compliance with containment measures recommended for the etiologic agent itself. The manipulation of cell cultures from human or primate origin necessitates the use of a type II biosafety cabinet. The scope of this chapter is to highlight aspects relevant for the risk assessment and to summarize the main biosafety recommendations and the recent technological advances allowing a mitigation of the risk for the handling of animal cell cultures. 2014-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7122109/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_22 Text en © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Herman, Philippe Pauwels, Katia Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures |
title | Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures |
title_full | Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures |
title_fullStr | Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures |
title_full_unstemmed | Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures |
title_short | Biosafety Recommendations on the Handling of Animal Cell Cultures |
title_sort | biosafety recommendations on the handling of animal cell cultures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122109/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hermanphilippe biosafetyrecommendationsonthehandlingofanimalcellcultures AT pauwelskatia biosafetyrecommendationsonthehandlingofanimalcellcultures |