Cargando…

Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research

Background: Physicians should follow ethical principles in their relationships with industry and be mindful that such relationships—if they are perceived as conflicts of interest—can undermine trust in the patient-physician relationship. Methods: By identifying potential pitfalls and safeguards that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breault, Joseph L., Knafl, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284691
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0093
_version_ 1783515376951230464
author Breault, Joseph L.
Knafl, Emily
author_facet Breault, Joseph L.
Knafl, Emily
author_sort Breault, Joseph L.
collection PubMed
description Background: Physicians should follow ethical principles in their relationships with industry and be mindful that such relationships—if they are perceived as conflicts of interest—can undermine trust in the patient-physician relationship. Methods: By identifying potential pitfalls and safeguards that can help prevent problems, this article focuses on ensuring that physician-industry relationships do not result in ethical transgressions or cause damage to doctor-patient relationships. Results: Patient trust in physicians can be undermined by the perception that a physician-investigator is operating in the best interest of the research rather than the best interest of the patient. Payments from the pharmaceutical industry to physician-investigators are transparent because of the Sunshine Act, and patients can easily determine if their personal physicians have received money from industry. Research subsidies from industry should represent fair market value for the work performed. Postmarketing trials with the primary goal of increasing familiarity with a drug and prescribing rates should be avoided. Medical societies play an important role in establishing standards for professional conduct. Conclusion: Ethically sound actions in physician relationships with industry should be guided by professional standards, medical society guidelines, and local institutional policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7122252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71222522020-04-13 Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research Breault, Joseph L. Knafl, Emily Ochsner J Reviews and Contemporary Updates Background: Physicians should follow ethical principles in their relationships with industry and be mindful that such relationships—if they are perceived as conflicts of interest—can undermine trust in the patient-physician relationship. Methods: By identifying potential pitfalls and safeguards that can help prevent problems, this article focuses on ensuring that physician-industry relationships do not result in ethical transgressions or cause damage to doctor-patient relationships. Results: Patient trust in physicians can be undermined by the perception that a physician-investigator is operating in the best interest of the research rather than the best interest of the patient. Payments from the pharmaceutical industry to physician-investigators are transparent because of the Sunshine Act, and patients can easily determine if their personal physicians have received money from industry. Research subsidies from industry should represent fair market value for the work performed. Postmarketing trials with the primary goal of increasing familiarity with a drug and prescribing rates should be avoided. Medical societies play an important role in establishing standards for professional conduct. Conclusion: Ethically sound actions in physician relationships with industry should be guided by professional standards, medical society guidelines, and local institutional policies. Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2020 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7122252/ /pubmed/32284691 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0093 Text en ©2020 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode ©2020 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Reviews and Contemporary Updates
Breault, Joseph L.
Knafl, Emily
Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research
title Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research
title_full Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research
title_fullStr Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research
title_full_unstemmed Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research
title_short Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research
title_sort pitfalls and safeguards in industry-funded research
topic Reviews and Contemporary Updates
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284691
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0093
work_keys_str_mv AT breaultjosephl pitfallsandsafeguardsinindustryfundedresearch
AT knaflemily pitfallsandsafeguardsinindustryfundedresearch