Cargando…
Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research
Background: Physicians should follow ethical principles in their relationships with industry and be mindful that such relationships—if they are perceived as conflicts of interest—can undermine trust in the patient-physician relationship. Methods: By identifying potential pitfalls and safeguards that...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284691 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0093 |
_version_ | 1783515376951230464 |
---|---|
author | Breault, Joseph L. Knafl, Emily |
author_facet | Breault, Joseph L. Knafl, Emily |
author_sort | Breault, Joseph L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Physicians should follow ethical principles in their relationships with industry and be mindful that such relationships—if they are perceived as conflicts of interest—can undermine trust in the patient-physician relationship. Methods: By identifying potential pitfalls and safeguards that can help prevent problems, this article focuses on ensuring that physician-industry relationships do not result in ethical transgressions or cause damage to doctor-patient relationships. Results: Patient trust in physicians can be undermined by the perception that a physician-investigator is operating in the best interest of the research rather than the best interest of the patient. Payments from the pharmaceutical industry to physician-investigators are transparent because of the Sunshine Act, and patients can easily determine if their personal physicians have received money from industry. Research subsidies from industry should represent fair market value for the work performed. Postmarketing trials with the primary goal of increasing familiarity with a drug and prescribing rates should be avoided. Medical societies play an important role in establishing standards for professional conduct. Conclusion: Ethically sound actions in physician relationships with industry should be guided by professional standards, medical society guidelines, and local institutional policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7122252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71222522020-04-13 Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research Breault, Joseph L. Knafl, Emily Ochsner J Reviews and Contemporary Updates Background: Physicians should follow ethical principles in their relationships with industry and be mindful that such relationships—if they are perceived as conflicts of interest—can undermine trust in the patient-physician relationship. Methods: By identifying potential pitfalls and safeguards that can help prevent problems, this article focuses on ensuring that physician-industry relationships do not result in ethical transgressions or cause damage to doctor-patient relationships. Results: Patient trust in physicians can be undermined by the perception that a physician-investigator is operating in the best interest of the research rather than the best interest of the patient. Payments from the pharmaceutical industry to physician-investigators are transparent because of the Sunshine Act, and patients can easily determine if their personal physicians have received money from industry. Research subsidies from industry should represent fair market value for the work performed. Postmarketing trials with the primary goal of increasing familiarity with a drug and prescribing rates should be avoided. Medical societies play an important role in establishing standards for professional conduct. Conclusion: Ethically sound actions in physician relationships with industry should be guided by professional standards, medical society guidelines, and local institutional policies. Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2020 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7122252/ /pubmed/32284691 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0093 Text en ©2020 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode ©2020 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews and Contemporary Updates Breault, Joseph L. Knafl, Emily Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research |
title | Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research |
title_full | Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research |
title_fullStr | Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research |
title_short | Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research |
title_sort | pitfalls and safeguards in industry-funded research |
topic | Reviews and Contemporary Updates |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284691 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breaultjosephl pitfallsandsafeguardsinindustryfundedresearch AT knaflemily pitfallsandsafeguardsinindustryfundedresearch |