Cargando…

Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions

ECMO is increasingly being used to manage severe ARDS with refractory hypoxemia and hypercapnia, and to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and minimize ventilator-associated lung injury. However, there is limited high-level evidence to support its use. Early randomized trials did not show a bene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abrams, Darryl, Bacchetta, Matthew, Brodie, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122845/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3005-0_2
_version_ 1783515505892524032
author Abrams, Darryl
Bacchetta, Matthew
Brodie, Daniel
author_facet Abrams, Darryl
Bacchetta, Matthew
Brodie, Daniel
author_sort Abrams, Darryl
collection PubMed
description ECMO is increasingly being used to manage severe ARDS with refractory hypoxemia and hypercapnia, and to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and minimize ventilator-associated lung injury. However, there is limited high-level evidence to support its use. Early randomized trials did not show a benefit, though these studies were hampered by high mortality rates, limited experience with ECMO, and antiquated technology. Since the advent of more advanced circuit components and increased experience with the use of this technology, survival rates with ECMO for ARDS have improved. There is only one randomized trial to date which used a more modern ECMO circuit. This trial, which has significant limitations, demonstrated a survival benefit from referral to a specialized center for consideration for ECMO. However, a prospective randomized trial comparing ECMO, using modern equipment, to standard-of-care mechanical ventilation has yet to be performed. There are no universally accepted guidelines for initiation of ECMO for ARDS, however suggested criteria include PaO(2) to FIO(2) ratio less than 80, uncompensated respiratory acidosis, and excessively high plateau airway pressures despite optimal ventilator management. Relative contraindications include prolonged ventilation at high airway pressures or high FIO(2), contraindications to anticoagulation, and concurrent severe, irreversible comorbidities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7122845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71228452020-04-06 Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions Abrams, Darryl Bacchetta, Matthew Brodie, Daniel Extracorporeal Life Support for Adults Article ECMO is increasingly being used to manage severe ARDS with refractory hypoxemia and hypercapnia, and to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and minimize ventilator-associated lung injury. However, there is limited high-level evidence to support its use. Early randomized trials did not show a benefit, though these studies were hampered by high mortality rates, limited experience with ECMO, and antiquated technology. Since the advent of more advanced circuit components and increased experience with the use of this technology, survival rates with ECMO for ARDS have improved. There is only one randomized trial to date which used a more modern ECMO circuit. This trial, which has significant limitations, demonstrated a survival benefit from referral to a specialized center for consideration for ECMO. However, a prospective randomized trial comparing ECMO, using modern equipment, to standard-of-care mechanical ventilation has yet to be performed. There are no universally accepted guidelines for initiation of ECMO for ARDS, however suggested criteria include PaO(2) to FIO(2) ratio less than 80, uncompensated respiratory acidosis, and excessively high plateau airway pressures despite optimal ventilator management. Relative contraindications include prolonged ventilation at high airway pressures or high FIO(2), contraindications to anticoagulation, and concurrent severe, irreversible comorbidities. 2015-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7122845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3005-0_2 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Abrams, Darryl
Bacchetta, Matthew
Brodie, Daniel
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions
title Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions
title_full Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions
title_fullStr Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions
title_full_unstemmed Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions
title_short Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions
title_sort hypoxemic respiratory failure: evidence, indications, and exclusions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122845/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3005-0_2
work_keys_str_mv AT abramsdarryl hypoxemicrespiratoryfailureevidenceindicationsandexclusions
AT bacchettamatthew hypoxemicrespiratoryfailureevidenceindicationsandexclusions
AT brodiedaniel hypoxemicrespiratoryfailureevidenceindicationsandexclusions