Cargando…
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions
ECMO is increasingly being used to manage severe ARDS with refractory hypoxemia and hypercapnia, and to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and minimize ventilator-associated lung injury. However, there is limited high-level evidence to support its use. Early randomized trials did not show a bene...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3005-0_2 |
_version_ | 1783515505892524032 |
---|---|
author | Abrams, Darryl Bacchetta, Matthew Brodie, Daniel |
author_facet | Abrams, Darryl Bacchetta, Matthew Brodie, Daniel |
author_sort | Abrams, Darryl |
collection | PubMed |
description | ECMO is increasingly being used to manage severe ARDS with refractory hypoxemia and hypercapnia, and to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and minimize ventilator-associated lung injury. However, there is limited high-level evidence to support its use. Early randomized trials did not show a benefit, though these studies were hampered by high mortality rates, limited experience with ECMO, and antiquated technology. Since the advent of more advanced circuit components and increased experience with the use of this technology, survival rates with ECMO for ARDS have improved. There is only one randomized trial to date which used a more modern ECMO circuit. This trial, which has significant limitations, demonstrated a survival benefit from referral to a specialized center for consideration for ECMO. However, a prospective randomized trial comparing ECMO, using modern equipment, to standard-of-care mechanical ventilation has yet to be performed. There are no universally accepted guidelines for initiation of ECMO for ARDS, however suggested criteria include PaO(2) to FIO(2) ratio less than 80, uncompensated respiratory acidosis, and excessively high plateau airway pressures despite optimal ventilator management. Relative contraindications include prolonged ventilation at high airway pressures or high FIO(2), contraindications to anticoagulation, and concurrent severe, irreversible comorbidities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7122845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71228452020-04-06 Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions Abrams, Darryl Bacchetta, Matthew Brodie, Daniel Extracorporeal Life Support for Adults Article ECMO is increasingly being used to manage severe ARDS with refractory hypoxemia and hypercapnia, and to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and minimize ventilator-associated lung injury. However, there is limited high-level evidence to support its use. Early randomized trials did not show a benefit, though these studies were hampered by high mortality rates, limited experience with ECMO, and antiquated technology. Since the advent of more advanced circuit components and increased experience with the use of this technology, survival rates with ECMO for ARDS have improved. There is only one randomized trial to date which used a more modern ECMO circuit. This trial, which has significant limitations, demonstrated a survival benefit from referral to a specialized center for consideration for ECMO. However, a prospective randomized trial comparing ECMO, using modern equipment, to standard-of-care mechanical ventilation has yet to be performed. There are no universally accepted guidelines for initiation of ECMO for ARDS, however suggested criteria include PaO(2) to FIO(2) ratio less than 80, uncompensated respiratory acidosis, and excessively high plateau airway pressures despite optimal ventilator management. Relative contraindications include prolonged ventilation at high airway pressures or high FIO(2), contraindications to anticoagulation, and concurrent severe, irreversible comorbidities. 2015-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7122845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3005-0_2 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Abrams, Darryl Bacchetta, Matthew Brodie, Daniel Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions |
title | Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions |
title_full | Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions |
title_fullStr | Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions |
title_full_unstemmed | Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions |
title_short | Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Evidence, Indications, and Exclusions |
title_sort | hypoxemic respiratory failure: evidence, indications, and exclusions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7122845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3005-0_2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abramsdarryl hypoxemicrespiratoryfailureevidenceindicationsandexclusions AT bacchettamatthew hypoxemicrespiratoryfailureevidenceindicationsandexclusions AT brodiedaniel hypoxemicrespiratoryfailureevidenceindicationsandexclusions |