Cargando…
Biological and Chemical Weapons
The five anthrax letters put in the US mail in 2001 greatly raised concerns about BW and CW. In general, chemical weapons are considered about as lethal per unit mass as conventional explosives and much less lethal than either nuclear or biological weapons (dirty bombs are much less lethal, Chap. 10...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7123302/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25367-1_15 |
_version_ | 1783515607843471360 |
---|---|
author | Hafemeister, David |
author_facet | Hafemeister, David |
author_sort | Hafemeister, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | The five anthrax letters put in the US mail in 2001 greatly raised concerns about BW and CW. In general, chemical weapons are considered about as lethal per unit mass as conventional explosives and much less lethal than either nuclear or biological weapons (dirty bombs are much less lethal, Chap. 10.1007/978-3-319-25367-1_13). Biological weapons can be as lethal as nuclear weapons if dispersed effectively, but that is not easy to do. For BW to be effective, the bio-materials must be chemically robust, remaining stable, not decaying in sunlight, moisture and rain. This can be accomplished with spores and aerosols. BW material must be dispersed widely, not clumping in few locations. BW can be delivered by cluster bomblets from small missiles. BW can be delivered by helicopter or low-flying crop-duster, or BW can be released in many locations in many small spray cans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7123302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71233022020-04-06 Biological and Chemical Weapons Hafemeister, David Nuclear Proliferation and Terrorism in the Post-9/11 World Article The five anthrax letters put in the US mail in 2001 greatly raised concerns about BW and CW. In general, chemical weapons are considered about as lethal per unit mass as conventional explosives and much less lethal than either nuclear or biological weapons (dirty bombs are much less lethal, Chap. 10.1007/978-3-319-25367-1_13). Biological weapons can be as lethal as nuclear weapons if dispersed effectively, but that is not easy to do. For BW to be effective, the bio-materials must be chemically robust, remaining stable, not decaying in sunlight, moisture and rain. This can be accomplished with spores and aerosols. BW material must be dispersed widely, not clumping in few locations. BW can be delivered by cluster bomblets from small missiles. BW can be delivered by helicopter or low-flying crop-duster, or BW can be released in many locations in many small spray cans. 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7123302/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25367-1_15 Text en © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Hafemeister, David Biological and Chemical Weapons |
title | Biological and Chemical Weapons |
title_full | Biological and Chemical Weapons |
title_fullStr | Biological and Chemical Weapons |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological and Chemical Weapons |
title_short | Biological and Chemical Weapons |
title_sort | biological and chemical weapons |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7123302/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25367-1_15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hafemeisterdavid biologicalandchemicalweapons |