Cargando…
The Current Bioweapons Threat
According to unclassified U.S. government sources, states of biological weapons (BW) proliferation concern include China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Syria. Assessing the BW threat is challenging, however, because illicit development and production can be concealed at dual-use industrial sites su...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7123542/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5273-3_2 |
_version_ | 1783515659571822592 |
---|---|
author | Tucker, Jonathan B. |
author_facet | Tucker, Jonathan B. |
author_sort | Tucker, Jonathan B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to unclassified U.S. government sources, states of biological weapons (BW) proliferation concern include China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Syria. Assessing the BW threat is challenging, however, because illicit development and production can be concealed at dual-use industrial sites such as vaccine plants, and only tens of kilograms of an agent like dried anthrax spores can be militarily significant. The lack of unambiguous technical signatures of BW-related activity means that most estimates of foreign capabilities draw heavily on human intelligence sources, yet spies and defectors are notoriously unreliable. A key factor driving BW proliferation is the perceived military utility of biological weapons, which may include strategic deterrence, asymmetric warfare, or covert operations. Globalization of the biotechnology industry has expanded trade in dual-use materials and production equipment, increasing the risks of diversion and misuse for BW purposes. With the advent of flexible biological manufacturing systems, it has also become possible for countries to acquire a “latent” capacity for BW production during a crisis or war. Since the 2001 anthrax letter attacks, sub-state actors have become a prominent part of the threat matrix, but terrorist acquisition and use of BW requires both the motivation to use disease as a weapon and the technical capability to do so, a combination that is quite rare. At present the threat of mass-casualty BW attacks emanates primarily from nation-states, while terrorist use of biological weapons will likely remain limited in scale and impact. Nevertheless, the emergence of new biotechnologies with a potential for misuse could result in more damaging incidents of bioterrorism in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7123542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71235422020-04-06 The Current Bioweapons Threat Tucker, Jonathan B. Biopreparedness and Public Health Article According to unclassified U.S. government sources, states of biological weapons (BW) proliferation concern include China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Syria. Assessing the BW threat is challenging, however, because illicit development and production can be concealed at dual-use industrial sites such as vaccine plants, and only tens of kilograms of an agent like dried anthrax spores can be militarily significant. The lack of unambiguous technical signatures of BW-related activity means that most estimates of foreign capabilities draw heavily on human intelligence sources, yet spies and defectors are notoriously unreliable. A key factor driving BW proliferation is the perceived military utility of biological weapons, which may include strategic deterrence, asymmetric warfare, or covert operations. Globalization of the biotechnology industry has expanded trade in dual-use materials and production equipment, increasing the risks of diversion and misuse for BW purposes. With the advent of flexible biological manufacturing systems, it has also become possible for countries to acquire a “latent” capacity for BW production during a crisis or war. Since the 2001 anthrax letter attacks, sub-state actors have become a prominent part of the threat matrix, but terrorist acquisition and use of BW requires both the motivation to use disease as a weapon and the technical capability to do so, a combination that is quite rare. At present the threat of mass-casualty BW attacks emanates primarily from nation-states, while terrorist use of biological weapons will likely remain limited in scale and impact. Nevertheless, the emergence of new biotechnologies with a potential for misuse could result in more damaging incidents of bioterrorism in the future. 2012-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7123542/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5273-3_2 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Tucker, Jonathan B. The Current Bioweapons Threat |
title | The Current Bioweapons Threat |
title_full | The Current Bioweapons Threat |
title_fullStr | The Current Bioweapons Threat |
title_full_unstemmed | The Current Bioweapons Threat |
title_short | The Current Bioweapons Threat |
title_sort | current bioweapons threat |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7123542/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5273-3_2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuckerjonathanb thecurrentbioweaponsthreat AT tuckerjonathanb currentbioweaponsthreat |