Cargando…

Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation

Effective disease control requires a strong partnership between clinicians and public health personnel. The vital role medical practitioners play is reflected globally in the obligation under health legislation for medical practitioners to notify the public health authority of specific details of na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ferson, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7123877/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_152
_version_ 1783515733458681856
author Ferson, Mark J.
author_facet Ferson, Mark J.
author_sort Ferson, Mark J.
collection PubMed
description Effective disease control requires a strong partnership between clinicians and public health personnel. The vital role medical practitioners play is reflected globally in the obligation under health legislation for medical practitioners to notify the public health authority of specific details of named patients suspected of having these diseases. While the principle is universal that the notification include the identity of the patient, to allow prompt and direct public health action, if needed, jurisdictions have varying approaches to many other aspects of notification: the actual list of notifiable conditions; who must notify and based on what degree of diagnostic certainty; in what timeframe and with what specific details; what information is to be provided to the case; and who bears responsibility for contact tracing. In addition, in some jurisdictions, medical practitioners have associated statutory obligations and powers, related to the examination of a patient directed for assessment by the public health authority, the furnishing of reports of such examinations, the role of the practitioner in ordering a patient into isolation, and responsibilities of medical practitioners in public health emergencies. Following a concise historical survey, finishing with the impact of the International Health Regulations 2005, this chapter systematically discusses the statutory obligations of medical practitioners for disease notification and related provisions, taking examples from English-language public health legislation used in Oceania, Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7123877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71238772020-04-06 Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation Ferson, Mark J. Legal and Forensic Medicine Article Effective disease control requires a strong partnership between clinicians and public health personnel. The vital role medical practitioners play is reflected globally in the obligation under health legislation for medical practitioners to notify the public health authority of specific details of named patients suspected of having these diseases. While the principle is universal that the notification include the identity of the patient, to allow prompt and direct public health action, if needed, jurisdictions have varying approaches to many other aspects of notification: the actual list of notifiable conditions; who must notify and based on what degree of diagnostic certainty; in what timeframe and with what specific details; what information is to be provided to the case; and who bears responsibility for contact tracing. In addition, in some jurisdictions, medical practitioners have associated statutory obligations and powers, related to the examination of a patient directed for assessment by the public health authority, the furnishing of reports of such examinations, the role of the practitioner in ordering a patient into isolation, and responsibilities of medical practitioners in public health emergencies. Following a concise historical survey, finishing with the impact of the International Health Regulations 2005, this chapter systematically discusses the statutory obligations of medical practitioners for disease notification and related provisions, taking examples from English-language public health legislation used in Oceania, Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa. 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7123877/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_152 Text en © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Ferson, Mark J.
Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation
title Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation
title_full Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation
title_fullStr Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation
title_full_unstemmed Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation
title_short Notification and Disease Control: Obligations of the Medical Practitioner Under Public Health Legislation
title_sort notification and disease control: obligations of the medical practitioner under public health legislation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7123877/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_152
work_keys_str_mv AT fersonmarkj notificationanddiseasecontrolobligationsofthemedicalpractitionerunderpublichealthlegislation