Cargando…
Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study conducted during March 14 to April 2, 2003, 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) screening scores were developed for predicting SARS among febrile patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to validate these scoring sy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc.
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14707938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.042 |
_version_ | 1783515803333689344 |
---|---|
author | Su, Chan-Ping Chiang, Wen-Chu Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming Chen, Shey-Ying Hsu, Chiung-Yuan Ko, Patrick Chow-In Tsai, Kuang-Chau Fan, Chieh-Min Shih, Fuh-Yuan Chen, Shyr-Chyr Chen, Yee-Chun Chang, Shan-Chwen Chen, Wen-Jone |
author_facet | Su, Chan-Ping Chiang, Wen-Chu Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming Chen, Shey-Ying Hsu, Chiung-Yuan Ko, Patrick Chow-In Tsai, Kuang-Chau Fan, Chieh-Min Shih, Fuh-Yuan Chen, Shyr-Chyr Chen, Yee-Chun Chang, Shan-Chwen Chen, Wen-Jone |
author_sort | Su, Chan-Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study conducted during March 14 to April 2, 2003, 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) screening scores were developed for predicting SARS among febrile patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to validate these scoring systems with a different set of patients. METHODS: All adult patients with documented fever, measured at home or at the hospital, and presenting to the ED of National Taiwan University Hospital, a 2,400-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in northern Taiwan, were prospectively enrolled. Two previously developed SARS screening scores were applied to all patients. The final diagnosis of SARS was made by the Expert Committee of the Center for Disease Control Taiwan, Republic of China, according to the criteria of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. RESULTS: A total of 239 adult patients, including 117 men and 122 women, were enrolled. Eighty-two patients were finally diagnosed with SARS. Compared with the SARS patients in the derivation cohort, those in the validation cohort were older (44.5±15.9 versus 33.9±15.9 years), more likely to acquire the disease locally (76.8% versus 37.5%), and more likely to have cough before or during fever. For the non-SARS patients, cases in the validation cohort presented with less cough and coryza but more diarrhea. For the 4-item symptom score, the sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.7% to 98.7%) and the specificity 51.6% (95% CI 43.8% to 59.3%). For the 6-item clinical score, the sensitivity reached 92.6% (95% CI 84.8% to 96.6%) and the specificity 71.2% (95% CI 63.6% to 77.7%). When the clinical score was applied to patients with a positive symptom score, the combined sensitivity reached 90.2% (95% CI 82.0% to 95.0%), and the combined specificity reached 80.1% (95% CI 73.2% to 85.6%). CONCLUSION: This prospective study validated the scoring system previously developed by using a different cohort. The scoring systems could be applied to settings where mass screening of SARS is needed during future outbreaks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7124226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71242262020-04-08 Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() Su, Chan-Ping Chiang, Wen-Chu Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming Chen, Shey-Ying Hsu, Chiung-Yuan Ko, Patrick Chow-In Tsai, Kuang-Chau Fan, Chieh-Min Shih, Fuh-Yuan Chen, Shyr-Chyr Chen, Yee-Chun Chang, Shan-Chwen Chen, Wen-Jone Ann Emerg Med Article STUDY OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study conducted during March 14 to April 2, 2003, 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) screening scores were developed for predicting SARS among febrile patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to validate these scoring systems with a different set of patients. METHODS: All adult patients with documented fever, measured at home or at the hospital, and presenting to the ED of National Taiwan University Hospital, a 2,400-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in northern Taiwan, were prospectively enrolled. Two previously developed SARS screening scores were applied to all patients. The final diagnosis of SARS was made by the Expert Committee of the Center for Disease Control Taiwan, Republic of China, according to the criteria of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. RESULTS: A total of 239 adult patients, including 117 men and 122 women, were enrolled. Eighty-two patients were finally diagnosed with SARS. Compared with the SARS patients in the derivation cohort, those in the validation cohort were older (44.5±15.9 versus 33.9±15.9 years), more likely to acquire the disease locally (76.8% versus 37.5%), and more likely to have cough before or during fever. For the non-SARS patients, cases in the validation cohort presented with less cough and coryza but more diarrhea. For the 4-item symptom score, the sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.7% to 98.7%) and the specificity 51.6% (95% CI 43.8% to 59.3%). For the 6-item clinical score, the sensitivity reached 92.6% (95% CI 84.8% to 96.6%) and the specificity 71.2% (95% CI 63.6% to 77.7%). When the clinical score was applied to patients with a positive symptom score, the combined sensitivity reached 90.2% (95% CI 82.0% to 95.0%), and the combined specificity reached 80.1% (95% CI 73.2% to 85.6%). CONCLUSION: This prospective study validated the scoring system previously developed by using a different cohort. The scoring systems could be applied to settings where mass screening of SARS is needed during future outbreaks. American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. 2004-01 2003-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7124226/ /pubmed/14707938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.042 Text en © 2004 American College of Emergency Physicians Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Su, Chan-Ping Chiang, Wen-Chu Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming Chen, Shey-Ying Hsu, Chiung-Yuan Ko, Patrick Chow-In Tsai, Kuang-Chau Fan, Chieh-Min Shih, Fuh-Yuan Chen, Shyr-Chyr Chen, Yee-Chun Chang, Shan-Chwen Chen, Wen-Jone Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() |
title | Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() |
title_full | Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() |
title_fullStr | Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() |
title_short | Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() |
title_sort | validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14707938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suchanping validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT chiangwenchu validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT mamatthewhueiming validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT chensheyying validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT hsuchiungyuan validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT kopatrickchowin validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT tsaikuangchau validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT fanchiehmin validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT shihfuhyuan validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT chenshyrchyr validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT chenyeechun validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT changshanchwen validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem AT chenwenjone validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem |