Cargando…

Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study conducted during March 14 to April 2, 2003, 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) screening scores were developed for predicting SARS among febrile patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to validate these scoring sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Chan-Ping, Chiang, Wen-Chu, Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming, Chen, Shey-Ying, Hsu, Chiung-Yuan, Ko, Patrick Chow-In, Tsai, Kuang-Chau, Fan, Chieh-Min, Shih, Fuh-Yuan, Chen, Shyr-Chyr, Chen, Yee-Chun, Chang, Shan-Chwen, Chen, Wen-Jone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14707938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.042
_version_ 1783515803333689344
author Su, Chan-Ping
Chiang, Wen-Chu
Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming
Chen, Shey-Ying
Hsu, Chiung-Yuan
Ko, Patrick Chow-In
Tsai, Kuang-Chau
Fan, Chieh-Min
Shih, Fuh-Yuan
Chen, Shyr-Chyr
Chen, Yee-Chun
Chang, Shan-Chwen
Chen, Wen-Jone
author_facet Su, Chan-Ping
Chiang, Wen-Chu
Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming
Chen, Shey-Ying
Hsu, Chiung-Yuan
Ko, Patrick Chow-In
Tsai, Kuang-Chau
Fan, Chieh-Min
Shih, Fuh-Yuan
Chen, Shyr-Chyr
Chen, Yee-Chun
Chang, Shan-Chwen
Chen, Wen-Jone
author_sort Su, Chan-Ping
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study conducted during March 14 to April 2, 2003, 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) screening scores were developed for predicting SARS among febrile patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to validate these scoring systems with a different set of patients. METHODS: All adult patients with documented fever, measured at home or at the hospital, and presenting to the ED of National Taiwan University Hospital, a 2,400-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in northern Taiwan, were prospectively enrolled. Two previously developed SARS screening scores were applied to all patients. The final diagnosis of SARS was made by the Expert Committee of the Center for Disease Control Taiwan, Republic of China, according to the criteria of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. RESULTS: A total of 239 adult patients, including 117 men and 122 women, were enrolled. Eighty-two patients were finally diagnosed with SARS. Compared with the SARS patients in the derivation cohort, those in the validation cohort were older (44.5±15.9 versus 33.9±15.9 years), more likely to acquire the disease locally (76.8% versus 37.5%), and more likely to have cough before or during fever. For the non-SARS patients, cases in the validation cohort presented with less cough and coryza but more diarrhea. For the 4-item symptom score, the sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.7% to 98.7%) and the specificity 51.6% (95% CI 43.8% to 59.3%). For the 6-item clinical score, the sensitivity reached 92.6% (95% CI 84.8% to 96.6%) and the specificity 71.2% (95% CI 63.6% to 77.7%). When the clinical score was applied to patients with a positive symptom score, the combined sensitivity reached 90.2% (95% CI 82.0% to 95.0%), and the combined specificity reached 80.1% (95% CI 73.2% to 85.6%). CONCLUSION: This prospective study validated the scoring system previously developed by using a different cohort. The scoring systems could be applied to settings where mass screening of SARS is needed during future outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7124226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71242262020-04-08 Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system() Su, Chan-Ping Chiang, Wen-Chu Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming Chen, Shey-Ying Hsu, Chiung-Yuan Ko, Patrick Chow-In Tsai, Kuang-Chau Fan, Chieh-Min Shih, Fuh-Yuan Chen, Shyr-Chyr Chen, Yee-Chun Chang, Shan-Chwen Chen, Wen-Jone Ann Emerg Med Article STUDY OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study conducted during March 14 to April 2, 2003, 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) screening scores were developed for predicting SARS among febrile patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to validate these scoring systems with a different set of patients. METHODS: All adult patients with documented fever, measured at home or at the hospital, and presenting to the ED of National Taiwan University Hospital, a 2,400-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in northern Taiwan, were prospectively enrolled. Two previously developed SARS screening scores were applied to all patients. The final diagnosis of SARS was made by the Expert Committee of the Center for Disease Control Taiwan, Republic of China, according to the criteria of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. RESULTS: A total of 239 adult patients, including 117 men and 122 women, were enrolled. Eighty-two patients were finally diagnosed with SARS. Compared with the SARS patients in the derivation cohort, those in the validation cohort were older (44.5±15.9 versus 33.9±15.9 years), more likely to acquire the disease locally (76.8% versus 37.5%), and more likely to have cough before or during fever. For the non-SARS patients, cases in the validation cohort presented with less cough and coryza but more diarrhea. For the 4-item symptom score, the sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.7% to 98.7%) and the specificity 51.6% (95% CI 43.8% to 59.3%). For the 6-item clinical score, the sensitivity reached 92.6% (95% CI 84.8% to 96.6%) and the specificity 71.2% (95% CI 63.6% to 77.7%). When the clinical score was applied to patients with a positive symptom score, the combined sensitivity reached 90.2% (95% CI 82.0% to 95.0%), and the combined specificity reached 80.1% (95% CI 73.2% to 85.6%). CONCLUSION: This prospective study validated the scoring system previously developed by using a different cohort. The scoring systems could be applied to settings where mass screening of SARS is needed during future outbreaks. American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. 2004-01 2003-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7124226/ /pubmed/14707938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.042 Text en © 2004 American College of Emergency Physicians Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Su, Chan-Ping
Chiang, Wen-Chu
Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming
Chen, Shey-Ying
Hsu, Chiung-Yuan
Ko, Patrick Chow-In
Tsai, Kuang-Chau
Fan, Chieh-Min
Shih, Fuh-Yuan
Chen, Shyr-Chyr
Chen, Yee-Chun
Chang, Shan-Chwen
Chen, Wen-Jone
Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
title Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
title_full Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
title_fullStr Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
title_short Validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
title_sort validation of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome scoring system()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14707938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.042
work_keys_str_mv AT suchanping validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT chiangwenchu validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT mamatthewhueiming validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT chensheyying validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT hsuchiungyuan validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT kopatrickchowin validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT tsaikuangchau validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT fanchiehmin validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT shihfuhyuan validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT chenshyrchyr validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT chenyeechun validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT changshanchwen validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem
AT chenwenjone validationofanovelsevereacuterespiratorysyndromescoringsystem