Cargando…
Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
Rationale: Although proposed as a clinical prompt to sepsis based on predictive validity for mortality, the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is often used as a screening tool, which requires high sensitivity. Objectives: To assess the predictive accuracy of qSOFA for morta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Thoracic Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC |
_version_ | 1783515846050578432 |
---|---|
author | Machado, Flavia R. Cavalcanti, Alexandre B. Monteiro, Mariana B. Sousa, Juliana L. Bossa, Aline Bafi, Antonio T. Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Freitas, Flavio G. R. Lisboa, Thiago Westphal, Glauco A. Japiassu, Andre M. |
author_facet | Machado, Flavia R. Cavalcanti, Alexandre B. Monteiro, Mariana B. Sousa, Juliana L. Bossa, Aline Bafi, Antonio T. Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Freitas, Flavio G. R. Lisboa, Thiago Westphal, Glauco A. Japiassu, Andre M. |
author_sort | Machado, Flavia R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rationale: Although proposed as a clinical prompt to sepsis based on predictive validity for mortality, the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is often used as a screening tool, which requires high sensitivity. Objectives: To assess the predictive accuracy of qSOFA for mortality in Brazil, focusing on sensitivity. Methods: We prospectively collected data from two cohorts of emergency department and ward patients. Cohort 1 included patients with suspected infection but without organ dysfunction or sepsis (22 hospitals: 3 public and 19 private). Cohort 2 included patients with sepsis (54 hospitals: 24 public and 28 private). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The predictive accuracy of qSOFA was examined considering only the worst values before the suspicion of infection or sepsis. Measurements and Main Results: Cohort 1 contained 5,460 patients (mortality rate, 14.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1–15.0), among whom 78.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 8.3%; 95% CI, 7.5–9.1). The sensitivity of a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 for predicting mortality was 53.9% and the 95% CI was 50.3 to 57.5. The sensitivity was higher for a qSOFA greater than or equal to 1 (84.9%; 95% CI, 82.1–87.3), a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or lactate greater than 2 mmol/L (91.3%; 95% CI, 89.0–93.2), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome plus organ dysfunction (68.7%; 95% CI, 65.2–71.9). Cohort 2 contained 4,711 patients, among whom 62.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 17.3%; 95% CI, 15.9–18.7), whereas in public hospitals the mortality rate was 39.3% (95% CI, 35.5–43.3). Conclusions: A qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 has low sensitivity for predicting death in patients with suspected infection in a developing country. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 as a screening tool for sepsis may miss patients who ultimately die. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or adding lactate to a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 may improve sensitivity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03158493). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7124712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Thoracic Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71247122020-04-07 Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study Machado, Flavia R. Cavalcanti, Alexandre B. Monteiro, Mariana B. Sousa, Juliana L. Bossa, Aline Bafi, Antonio T. Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Freitas, Flavio G. R. Lisboa, Thiago Westphal, Glauco A. Japiassu, Andre M. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Original Articles Rationale: Although proposed as a clinical prompt to sepsis based on predictive validity for mortality, the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is often used as a screening tool, which requires high sensitivity. Objectives: To assess the predictive accuracy of qSOFA for mortality in Brazil, focusing on sensitivity. Methods: We prospectively collected data from two cohorts of emergency department and ward patients. Cohort 1 included patients with suspected infection but without organ dysfunction or sepsis (22 hospitals: 3 public and 19 private). Cohort 2 included patients with sepsis (54 hospitals: 24 public and 28 private). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The predictive accuracy of qSOFA was examined considering only the worst values before the suspicion of infection or sepsis. Measurements and Main Results: Cohort 1 contained 5,460 patients (mortality rate, 14.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1–15.0), among whom 78.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 8.3%; 95% CI, 7.5–9.1). The sensitivity of a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 for predicting mortality was 53.9% and the 95% CI was 50.3 to 57.5. The sensitivity was higher for a qSOFA greater than or equal to 1 (84.9%; 95% CI, 82.1–87.3), a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or lactate greater than 2 mmol/L (91.3%; 95% CI, 89.0–93.2), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome plus organ dysfunction (68.7%; 95% CI, 65.2–71.9). Cohort 2 contained 4,711 patients, among whom 62.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 17.3%; 95% CI, 15.9–18.7), whereas in public hospitals the mortality rate was 39.3% (95% CI, 35.5–43.3). Conclusions: A qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 has low sensitivity for predicting death in patients with suspected infection in a developing country. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 as a screening tool for sepsis may miss patients who ultimately die. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or adding lactate to a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 may improve sensitivity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03158493). American Thoracic Society 2020-04-01 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7124712/ /pubmed/31910037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC Text en Copyright © 2020 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). For commercial use and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Machado, Flavia R. Cavalcanti, Alexandre B. Monteiro, Mariana B. Sousa, Juliana L. Bossa, Aline Bafi, Antonio T. Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Freitas, Flavio G. R. Lisboa, Thiago Westphal, Glauco A. Japiassu, Andre M. Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study |
title | Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study |
title_full | Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study |
title_fullStr | Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study |
title_short | Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study |
title_sort | predictive accuracy of the quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in brazil. a prospective multicenter study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC |
work_keys_str_mv | AT machadoflaviar predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT cavalcantialexandreb predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT monteiromarianab predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT sousajulianal predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT bossaaline predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT bafiantoniot predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT dalpizzolfelipe predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT freitasflaviogr predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT lisboathiago predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT westphalglaucoa predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT japiassuandrem predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy |