Cargando…

Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study

Rationale: Although proposed as a clinical prompt to sepsis based on predictive validity for mortality, the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is often used as a screening tool, which requires high sensitivity. Objectives: To assess the predictive accuracy of qSOFA for morta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Machado, Flavia R., Cavalcanti, Alexandre B., Monteiro, Mariana B., Sousa, Juliana L., Bossa, Aline, Bafi, Antonio T., Dal-Pizzol, Felipe, Freitas, Flavio G. R., Lisboa, Thiago, Westphal, Glauco A., Japiassu, Andre M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC
_version_ 1783515846050578432
author Machado, Flavia R.
Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
Monteiro, Mariana B.
Sousa, Juliana L.
Bossa, Aline
Bafi, Antonio T.
Dal-Pizzol, Felipe
Freitas, Flavio G. R.
Lisboa, Thiago
Westphal, Glauco A.
Japiassu, Andre M.
author_facet Machado, Flavia R.
Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
Monteiro, Mariana B.
Sousa, Juliana L.
Bossa, Aline
Bafi, Antonio T.
Dal-Pizzol, Felipe
Freitas, Flavio G. R.
Lisboa, Thiago
Westphal, Glauco A.
Japiassu, Andre M.
author_sort Machado, Flavia R.
collection PubMed
description Rationale: Although proposed as a clinical prompt to sepsis based on predictive validity for mortality, the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is often used as a screening tool, which requires high sensitivity. Objectives: To assess the predictive accuracy of qSOFA for mortality in Brazil, focusing on sensitivity. Methods: We prospectively collected data from two cohorts of emergency department and ward patients. Cohort 1 included patients with suspected infection but without organ dysfunction or sepsis (22 hospitals: 3 public and 19 private). Cohort 2 included patients with sepsis (54 hospitals: 24 public and 28 private). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The predictive accuracy of qSOFA was examined considering only the worst values before the suspicion of infection or sepsis. Measurements and Main Results: Cohort 1 contained 5,460 patients (mortality rate, 14.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1–15.0), among whom 78.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 8.3%; 95% CI, 7.5–9.1). The sensitivity of a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 for predicting mortality was 53.9% and the 95% CI was 50.3 to 57.5. The sensitivity was higher for a qSOFA greater than or equal to 1 (84.9%; 95% CI, 82.1–87.3), a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or lactate greater than 2 mmol/L (91.3%; 95% CI, 89.0–93.2), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome plus organ dysfunction (68.7%; 95% CI, 65.2–71.9). Cohort 2 contained 4,711 patients, among whom 62.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 17.3%; 95% CI, 15.9–18.7), whereas in public hospitals the mortality rate was 39.3% (95% CI, 35.5–43.3). Conclusions: A qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 has low sensitivity for predicting death in patients with suspected infection in a developing country. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 as a screening tool for sepsis may miss patients who ultimately die. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or adding lactate to a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 may improve sensitivity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03158493).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7124712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71247122020-04-07 Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study Machado, Flavia R. Cavalcanti, Alexandre B. Monteiro, Mariana B. Sousa, Juliana L. Bossa, Aline Bafi, Antonio T. Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Freitas, Flavio G. R. Lisboa, Thiago Westphal, Glauco A. Japiassu, Andre M. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Original Articles Rationale: Although proposed as a clinical prompt to sepsis based on predictive validity for mortality, the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is often used as a screening tool, which requires high sensitivity. Objectives: To assess the predictive accuracy of qSOFA for mortality in Brazil, focusing on sensitivity. Methods: We prospectively collected data from two cohorts of emergency department and ward patients. Cohort 1 included patients with suspected infection but without organ dysfunction or sepsis (22 hospitals: 3 public and 19 private). Cohort 2 included patients with sepsis (54 hospitals: 24 public and 28 private). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The predictive accuracy of qSOFA was examined considering only the worst values before the suspicion of infection or sepsis. Measurements and Main Results: Cohort 1 contained 5,460 patients (mortality rate, 14.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1–15.0), among whom 78.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 8.3%; 95% CI, 7.5–9.1). The sensitivity of a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 for predicting mortality was 53.9% and the 95% CI was 50.3 to 57.5. The sensitivity was higher for a qSOFA greater than or equal to 1 (84.9%; 95% CI, 82.1–87.3), a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or lactate greater than 2 mmol/L (91.3%; 95% CI, 89.0–93.2), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome plus organ dysfunction (68.7%; 95% CI, 65.2–71.9). Cohort 2 contained 4,711 patients, among whom 62.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 17.3%; 95% CI, 15.9–18.7), whereas in public hospitals the mortality rate was 39.3% (95% CI, 35.5–43.3). Conclusions: A qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 has low sensitivity for predicting death in patients with suspected infection in a developing country. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 as a screening tool for sepsis may miss patients who ultimately die. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or adding lactate to a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 may improve sensitivity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03158493). American Thoracic Society 2020-04-01 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7124712/ /pubmed/31910037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC Text en Copyright © 2020 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). For commercial use and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Machado, Flavia R.
Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
Monteiro, Mariana B.
Sousa, Juliana L.
Bossa, Aline
Bafi, Antonio T.
Dal-Pizzol, Felipe
Freitas, Flavio G. R.
Lisboa, Thiago
Westphal, Glauco A.
Japiassu, Andre M.
Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
title Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
title_full Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
title_short Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
title_sort predictive accuracy of the quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in brazil. a prospective multicenter study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC
work_keys_str_mv AT machadoflaviar predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT cavalcantialexandreb predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT monteiromarianab predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT sousajulianal predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT bossaaline predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT bafiantoniot predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT dalpizzolfelipe predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT freitasflaviogr predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT lisboathiago predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT westphalglaucoa predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT japiassuandrem predictiveaccuracyofthequicksepsisrelatedorganfailureassessmentscoreinbrazilaprospectivemulticenterstudy